Search

Objectives: The difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressure is referred to as the white-coat effect. In this study, we investigated (i) the magnitude of the white-coat effect in subjects with different daytime ambulatory blood pressure levels, and (ii) the association of the white-coat effect with left ventricular mass., Methods: A total of 1581 subjects underwent clinic blood pressure readings, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and left ventricular echocardiographic assessment. Their mean daytime systolic blood pressure varied from 88.0 to 208.9 mmHg and their mean daytime diastolic blood pressure from 40.3 to 133.0 mmHg., Results: A negative correlation was found between the systolic or diastolic white-coat effect and the systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure (r = -0.22, P < 0.000 and r = -0.50, P < 0.000, respectively). Left ventricular mass significantly correlated with ambulatory blood pressure (P < 0.001), but there was no association between left ventricular mass and clinic blood pressure or white-coat effect. Furthermore, the white-coat effect was reversed at the highest level of systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure (systolic over 170 mmHg or diastolic over 100 mmHg) when systolic or diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure was higher than systolic or diastolic clinic blood pressure (ambulatory blood pressure hypertension)., Conclusions: The white-coat effect shows an inverse association with daytime ambulatory blood pressure level (systolic or diastolic), being significantly more prominent for levels below 140/80 mmHg for systolic/diastolic daytime ambulatory blood pressure and reversed with daytime ambulatory blood pressure levels above 170/100 mmHg.

Background: Data on the reproducibility of serial measurements of ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the reproducibility of four consecutive ambulatory blood pressure measurements, and (2) the reproducibility of nocturnal falls in blood pressure in hypertensive patients., Methods: Twenty patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension underwent four separate ambulatory blood pressure monitorings, on the same day of the week, at 30-day intervals. Antihypertensive therapy was discontinued for 2 weeks before each recording. Comparing the mean values of blood pressure over 24h, as well as diurnal, nocturnal and hourly periods, among the four recordings determined the reproducibility of blood pressure measurements. A day/night difference in mean systolic and in mean diastolic blood pressure defined the nocturnal fall in blood pressure., Results: No significant differences were observed in either hourly, 24-h, diurnal or nocturnal systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, or in the nocturnal fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressure among the four recordings., Conclusions: Hourly systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and nocturnal fall in blood pressure were reproducible in four ambulatory blood pressure monitorings recorded over 4 months. These findings suggest that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is a reliable tool to monitor blood pressure changes.