Search

Despite decades of improvement in the quality and outcomes of cardiovascular care, significant gaps remain. Existing quality improvement strategies are often limited in scope to specific clinical conditions and episodic care. Health services and outcomes research is essential to inform gaps in care but rarely results in the development and implementation of care delivery solutions. Although individual health systems are engaged in projects to improve the quality of care delivery, these efforts often lack a robust study design or implementation evaluation that can inform generalizability and further dissemination. Aligning the work of health care systems and health services and outcomes researchers could serve as a strategy to overcome persisting gaps in cardiovascular quality and outcomes. We describe the inception of the Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium that seeks to rapidly improve cardiovascular care by (1) developing, implementing, and evaluating multicenter quality improvement projects using innovative care designs; (2) serving as a resource for quality improvement and care innovation partners; and (3) establishing a presence within existing quality improvement and care innovation structures. Success of the collaborative will be defined by projects that result in changes to care delivery with demonstrable impacts on the quality and outcomes of care across multiple health systems. Furthermore, insights gained from implementation of these projects across sites in Cardiovascular Quality Improvement and Care Innovation Consortium will inform and promote broad dissemination for greater impact.

Background: Systems to improve ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care have traditionally focused on improving door-to-balloon time. However, prompt guideline-directed medical therapy and transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are also associated with reduced STEMI mortality. The incremental prognostic value of each facet of STEMI care on clinical outcomes within a STEMI system of care is unknown., Methods and Results: We implemented systems-based strategies at our hospital to improve 3 STEMI care metrics: (1) prompt guideline-directed medical therapy before sheath insertion for PCI, (2) use of transradial primary PCI, and (3) door-to-balloon time. We assessed the incremental association of metrics achieved with in-hospital adverse events and 30-day mortality. Of 1272 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with PCI at our hospital (January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016), the percentage with achievement of zero, 1, 2, or 3 STEMI care metrics was 7.1%, 24.1%, 43.8%, and 25.1%; and 30-day mortality was 15.6%, 8.6%, 3.6%, and 3.2%, respectively (log-rank P<0.001). After adjusting for known clinical predictors of STEMI in-hospital mortality, achievement of at least 2 STEMI care metrics was associated with significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.96; P=0.041). Each metric provided incremental prognostic value when modeled in stepwise order of their occurrence in clinical practice (final model C statistic, 0.677; P<0.001)., Conclusions: Prompt guideline-directed medical therapy before sheath insertion for PCI, transradial primary PCI, and door-to-balloon time add incremental prognostic value in STEMI care. Expanding STEMI systems of care from a singular focus on door-to-balloon time to a comprehensive focus on multifaceted STEMI care offers an opportunity to further improve STEMI outcomes.