Search

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Objective: To evaluate the performance and convergent validity of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) in comparison with the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and neck disability index (NDI) in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.Summary Of Background Data: Neck-specific disability scales do not adequately assess concurrent upper extremity involvement in patients with cervical spine disorders. The DASH is a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instrument designed to measure functional disability due to upper extremity conditions but has additionally been shown to perform well in patients with neck disorders.Methods: We identified patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at our institution between 2013 and 2016. We collected demographic information, clinical characteristics, and PRO measures-DASH, VAS, NDI-preoperatively, as well as early and late postoperatively. We calculated descriptive statistics and changes from baseline in PROs. Correlation coefficients were used to quantify the association between PRO measures. The analysis was stratified by radiculopathy and myelopathy diagnoses.Results: A total of 1046 patients (52.8% male) with PROs data at baseline were included in the analysis. The mean age at surgery ± SD was 57.2 ± 11.3 years, and postoperative follow-up duration 12.7 ± 10.7 months. The most common surgical procedure was anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (71.1%). Patients experienced clinically meaningful postoperative improvements in all PRO measures. The DASH showed moderate positive correlations with VAS preoperatively (Spearman rho = 0.43), as well as early (rho = 0.48) and late postoperatively (rho = 0.60). DASH and NDI scores were strongly positively correlated across operative states (Preoperative rho = 0.74, Early Postoperative rho = 0.78, Late Postoperative rho = 0.82). Stratified analysis by preoperative diagnosis showed similar within-groups trends and pairwise correlations. However, radiculopathy patients experienced larger magnitude early and late change scores.Conclusion: The DASH is a valid and responsive PRO measure to evaluate disabling upper extremity involvement in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: We sought to perform a systematic, comprehensive, and nationwide cross-sectional analysis of surgical capacity in Lebanon. Background: Providing surgical care in refugee areas is increasingly recognized as a global health priority. The surgical capacity of Lebanon where at least 1 in 6 inhabitants is currently a refugee remains unknown. Methods: The Surgical Capacity in Areas with Refugees cross-sectional study included 3 steps: (1) geographically mapping all hospitals providing surgical care in Lebanon, (2) systematically assessing each hospital's surgical capacity, and (3) identifying surgical care gaps/disparities. First, a list of hospitals in Lebanon and their locations was generated combining data from the Lebanese Ministry of Health and Syndicate of Hospitals. Specialty, rehabilitation, and maternity facilities were excluded. Second, the validated 5 domain Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, and Supplies (PIPES) tool was administered in each hospital through a face-to-face or phone interview. Hospitals' PIPES indices were computed; data were aggregated and analyzed for geographic and private/public disparities. Results: A total of 129 hospitals were geographically mapped; 20% were public. The PIPES tool was administered in all hospitals (100%). The mean PIPES index was 10.98 (Personnel = 14.91, Infrastructure = 15.36, Procedures = 37.47, Equipment = 21.63, Supplies = 24.78). The number of hospital beds, operating rooms, surgeons, and anesthesiologists per 100,000 people were 217, 8, 16, and 9, respectively. Deficiencies in infrastructure were significant, whereby 62%, 36%, 16%, and 5% of hospitals lack incinerators, pretested blood, intensive care units, and computed tomography, respectively. Continuous external electricity was lacking in 16 hospitals (12%). Compared to private hospitals, public hospitals had a lower PIPES index (10.48 vs 11.1, P = 0.022), including lower Personnel and Infrastructure scores (12.31 vs 15.57, P = 0.03; 14.04 vs 15.7, P = 0.003, respectively). Geographically, the administrative governorates with highest refugee concentrations had the lowest PIPES indices. Conclusions: Evaluating surgical capacity in Lebanon reveals significant deficiencies, most pronounced in public hospitals in which refugee care is provided and in areas with the highest refugee concentration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]