Search

The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on college football operations, including athletes' training regimens. As a result of these changes, concern for increased injury susceptibility post COVID-19 regulations has become a point of discussion. The current study sought to evaluate the incidence of surgical injury among NCAA Division 1 college football players at the authors' institution during the first full season after start of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years. Retrospective chart review was performed for all players who sustained injuries requiring surgery while a member of the NCAA Division 1 football program during the 2009-2021 seasons. A p -value of ≤0.05 was used to determine significance. A total of 23 surgical injuries occurred in 22 players during the 2021 season compared with 121 in 118 players in the 12 previous seasons combined ( p = 0.0178; RR = 1.47). There was a significant increase in shoulder injuries ( n = 13 vs. n = 31; p = <0.0001; RR = 3.05) and specifically a significant increase in labral tears ( n = 10 vs. n = 30; p = 0.0003; RR = 2.74). No difference was seen in knee injuries ( n = 10 vs. n = 77; p = 0.27; RR = 1.35) and specifically no difference in anterior cruciate ligament injuries ( n = 3 vs. n = 31; p = 0.77; RR = 1.17). This phenomenon is multifactorial in nature, but alterations to players' training and preparations because of the COVID-19 pandemic likely resulted in suboptimal conditioning, leading to the increased incidence of surgical injuries emphasizing the importance of adequate strength training and conditioning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Football League (NFL) made changes to its operations for the 2020 season. We hypothesize an increase in the rate of injuries during the 2020 season. Publicly available data were reviewed to identify NFL injuries from the 2015-2020 seasons. Player position, description of injury, date of injury, and injury setting were recorded. p#0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the 2020 season, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons, there was an increased risk of injury during the regular season overall relative risk (RR) 5 1.308 (p, 0.05), week (W)1 RR 5 7.33 (p, 0.05), W1-6 RR 5 1.964 (p, 0.05), W7-12 RR 5 1.8909 (p, 0.05), and during the postseason overall RR 5 1.1444 (p, 0.05), calculated using analysis of variance. There was an overall increased risk of abdominal or core injuries RR51.248 (p < 0.05), groin or hip injuries RR52.534 (p < 0.05), and hamstring injuries RR 5 3.644 (p, 0.05). There was an increased risk of hamstring injuries in cornerbacks RR 5 3.219 (p, 0.05) and running backs RR 5 1.1394 (p, 0.05), hip or groin injuries in guards RR 5 1.105 (p, 0.05), Achilles tendon injuries in safeties RR51.6976 (p < 0.05), quadriceps injuries in running backs RR51.6191 (p < 0.05), and arm injuries in defensive tackles RR 5 1.221 (p, 0.05). There was an increase in the overall rate of injuries in the 2020 NFL season, both in the regular season and postseason, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons. The overall rate of abdominal or core, groin or hip, and hamstring injuries increased. Specific player positions saw unique increases in rates of injuries. These findings may be due to numerous operational changes implemented, such as reduced in-person training and the elimination of the preseason, leading to suboptimal, sportsspecific conditioning and increased risk of musculoskeletal injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Burke, J, Geller, JS, Perez, JR, Naik, K, Vidal, AF, Baraga, MG, and Kaplan, LD. The effect of passing plays on injury rates in the national football league. J Strength Cond Res 35(12S): S1–S4, 2021—The National Football League (NFL) has one of the highest all-cause injury rates in sports, yet our understanding of extrinsic injury risk factors is limited. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of play type on injury incidence in the NFL. We obtained data for every regular season game played during the 2013–2016 seasons from the official NFL game books. There were 2,721 in-game injuries during the 4 seasons examined, with an overall rate of 1.33 injuries per team per game. For statistical analysis, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Passing plays conferred significantly higher odds of injury than running plays (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–1.5, p < 0.0001). This primarily stems from increased risks in quarterbacks (OR 6.9, 95% CI: 3.6–13.3, p < 0.0001), receivers (OR 5.0, 95% CI: 3.7–6.6, p < 0.0001), and defensive backs (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.9–2.7, p < 0.0001). Our study suggests that passing plays confer a greater risk of overall injuries in the NFL when compared with running plays, specifically regarding concussions and core or trunk injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The past two decades have built on the successes of the Human Genome Project identifying the impact of genetics and genomics on human traits. Given the importance of exercise in the physical and psychological health of individuals across the lifespan, using genomics to understand the impact of genes in the sports medicine field is an emerging field. Given the complexity of the systems involved, high-throughput genomics is required to understand genetic variants, their functions, and ultimately their effect on the body. Consequently, genomic studies have been performed across several domains of sports medicine with varying degrees of success. While the breadth of these is great, they focus largely on the following three areas: 1) performance; 2) injury susceptibility; and 3) sports associated chronic conditions, such as osteoarthritis. Herein, we review literature on genetics and genomics in sports medicine, offer suggestions to bolster existing studies, and suggest ways to ideally impact clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In August 2016, a group including sport medicine clinicians, researchers, and a bioethicist met in Vail, Colorado to discuss regenerative medicine and its potential role in youth sports injuries. There was consensus that a call to action is urgently needed to understand the current evidence base, the risks and rewards, and future directions of research and clinical practice for regenerative medicine therapies in youth sports. We present here a summary of our meeting, which was supported by the National Youth Sports Health and Safety Institute (NYSHSI), a partnership between the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and Sanford Health. The group's goal is to educate practitioners and the public, and to pioneer a means of accumulating meaningful clinical data on regenerative medicine therapies in pediatric and adolescent athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health insurance status and access to care are recurring topics of discussion and concern. The purpose of this investigation was to examine access to care on the basis of insurance status for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in South Florida.Methods: From March 2010 to March 2011, eighty patients with ACL injuries were identified at a county hospital sports medicine clinic and a university-based sports medicine practice. Demographic and injury-specific data were obtained with attention to the date of injury, the date of diagnosis, and the number of medical visits. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models to determine the effect of insurance type on the time to diagnosis of an ACL tear.Results: Patients with private insurance were diagnosed at a median fourteen days after the injury, whereas those receiving Medicaid and those without insurance were diagnosed a median of fifty-six and 121 days after the injury, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients without insurance and those receiving Medicaid had more medical visits prior to diagnosis (median, four; range two to six) than those with private insurance (median, three; range, one to five) (p = 0.006). Differences for patient delays due to not seeking care were not significant among the three groups (p = 0.484).Conclusions: When grouped according to insurance status, subjects receiving Medicaid in South Florida faced greater system-related delays in obtaining care than did subjects with private insurance. System-related factors such as lack of access to specialized care result in an increased number of medical encounters. These regional findings are consistent with those of other regional studies on access to orthopaedic care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]