Search

Objective: To evaluate the long-term survival rate of critically ill sepsis survivors following cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a national scale.Design: Retrospective and observational cohort study.Setting: Data were extracted from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.Patients: A total of 272,897 ICU patients with sepsis were identified during 2000-2010. Patients who survived to hospital discharge were enrolled. Post-discharge survival outcomes of ICU sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation were compared with those of patients who did not experience cardiopulmonary arrest using propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio.Intervention: None.Measurements and Main Results: Only 7% (n = 3,207) of sepsis patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation survived to discharge. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year postdischarge survival rates following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were 28%, 23%, and 14%, respectively. Compared with sepsis survivors without cardiopulmonary arrest, sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation had a greater risk of all-cause mortality after discharge (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.34-1.46). This difference in mortality risk diminished after 2 years (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28). Multivariable analysis showed that independent risk factors for long-term mortality following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were male sex, older age, receipt of care in a nonmedical center, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, chronic kidney disease, cancer, respiratory infection, vasoactive agent use, and receipt of renal replacement therapy during ICU stay.Conclusion: The long-term outcome was worse in ICU survivors of sepsis who received in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation than in those who did not, but this increased risk of mortality diminished at 2 years after discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Substantial infective endocarditis (IE)-related morbidity and mortality may occur even after successful treatment. However, no previous study has explored long-term hard end points (ie, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiovascular death) in addition to all-cause mortality in IE survivors. Methods and Results--A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted among IE survivors identified with the use of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2000 to 2009. IE survivors were defined as those who survived after discharge from first hospitalization with a diagnosis of IE. A total of 10 116 IE survivors were identified. IE survivors were matched to control subjects without IE at a 1:1 ratio through the use of propensity scores. The primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmia. The secondary outcomes were repeat IE and all-cause mortality. Compared with the matched cohort, IE survivors had higher risks of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.80), hemorrhagic stroke (aHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.90-2.96), myocardial infarction (aHR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.79), readmission for heart failure (aHR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.05-2.43), sudden death or ventricular arrhythmia (aHR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.44-1.98), and all-cause death (aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.14-2.40). Risk factors for repeat IE were older age, male sex, drug abuse, and valvular replacement after an initial episode of IE. Conclusion--Despite treatment, the risk of long-term major adverse cardiac events was substantially increased in IE survivors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]