Search

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: To assess the relationship of fear avoidance and demoralization on gait and balance and determine a threshold score for the Tampa Scale for Kinesophobia (TSK) and the Demoralization Scale (DS) that identifies spine patients with gait and balance dysfunction amplified by underlying psychological factors.Summary Of Background Data: Fear avoidance and demoralization are crucial components of mental health that impact the outcomes in spine surgery. However, interpreting their effect on patient function remains challenging. Further establishing this correlation and identifying a threshold of severity can aid in identifying patients in whom a portion of their altered gait and balance may be amplified by underlying psychologic distress.Methods: Four hundred five symptomatic spine patients were given the TSK and DS questionnaires. Patient's gait and balance were tested with a human motion capture system. A TSK score of 41 and a DS score of 30 were chosen as thresholds to classify moderate versus severe dysfunction based on literature and statistical analysis.Results: Higher TSK and DS scores were correlated with worse walking speed (P < 0.001), longer stride time (P = 0.001), decreased stride length (P < 0.048), and wider step width (<0.001) during gait as well as increased sway across planes (P = 0.001) during standing balance. When classified by TSK scores >41, patients with more severe fear avoidance had slower walking speed (P < 0.001), longer stride time (P = 0.001), shorter stride length (P = 0.004), increased step width (P < 0.001), and increased sway (P = 0.001) compared with their lower scoring counterparts. Similarly, patients with DS > 30 had slower walking speed (P = 0.012), longer stride time (P = 0.022), and increased sway (P = 0.003) compared with their lower scoring counterparts.Conclusion: This study demonstrates that fear avoidance and demoralization directly correlate with worsening gait and balance. Furthermore, patients with TSK > 41 and DS > 30 have more underlying psychological factors that contribute to significantly worse function compared with lower scoring peers. Understanding this relationship and using these guidelines can help identify and treat patients whose gait dysfunction may be amplified by psychologic distress.Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Objective: Investigate the effect of surgical decompression and fusion on gait ground reaction forces (GRFs) parameters in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and to compare these values to those of healthy controls.Summary Of Background Data: Surgical intervention to alleviate spinal cord compression is typically recommended in cases of CSM. While the primary aim of surgery is to halt disease progression, the literature suggests that some symptomatic improvement is often observed postoperatively. Gait analysis via measurement of GRFs is a particularly sensitive means of quantifying changes in ambulatory function, but no comprehensive analysis has been published in the setting of CSM.Methods: Forty patients with symptomatic CSM underwent gait analysis with measurement of horizontal and vertical GRFs before and 3 months after surgery. Thirty healthy controls (H) underwent the same battery of tests. Comparisons were made between the pre- and postoperative profiles of patients with CSM as well as to that of the control group.Results: Before surgery, patients with CSM exhibited disturbances in GRF magnitudes: significantly greater maximum weight acceptance (Pre: 113.7 vs. H: 101.1% body weight [BW], P = 0.040) and push off forces (Pre: 112.2 vs. H: 101.4% BW, P = 0.044), and timing: maximum weight acceptance occurred earlier while mid-stance (Pre: 15.8 vs. H: 17.8% gait cycle [GC], P = 0.018), toe-off (Pre: 65.0 vs. H: 62.9% GC, P = 0.001), braking (Pre: 55.6 vs. H: 54.2% GC, P = 0.003), and propulsion occurred (Pre: 11.9 vs. H: 10.6% GC, P = 0.011) later compared with healthy controls. Surgery improved all GRF parameters (P < 0.039), but postoperative gait profiles did not completely normalize to levels observed in the control group.Conclusion: These observations combined with published data on gait muscle activation and gait patterns in CSM patients support the idea that patients with CSM have an altered gait profile consistent with a series of poorly controlled near falls. Surgical intervention was observed to produce improvements in but not complete resolution of these gait disturbances. These data provide a more comprehensive understanding of gait in the setting of CSM.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Objective: To quantify the effect of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery on balance and stability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and compare them to controls.Summary Of Background Data: DLS is a condition in which one vertebra subluxates relative to an adjacent vertebra in the absence of a disruption in the neural arch. While the existing literature demonstrates that decompression and fusion can successfully alleviate pain and reduce disability in patients with DLS, no studies to date have used quantitative dynamic testing to determine the effect of surgery on cone of economy (CoE) measures in this patient population.Methods: Forty-five DLS patients performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery and were compared to 28 controls. The outcome measures included range of sway (RoS) and total sway for the center of mass (CoM) and head in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, along with leg and back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Fear/Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK), and Demoralization scale.Results: RoS for the CoM (P < 0.005) and head (P < 0.017) decreased in all planes postoperatively. Reductions in CoM (P = 0.001) and head total sway (P = 0.001) were also observed after surgery. Furthermore, patients with DLS reported strong improvements in VAS low back (P = 0.001), VAS leg (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.001), FABQ Physical (P = 0.003), TSK (P = 0.001), and demoralization (P = 0.044) with surgical intervention. Although total sway was reduced after surgery, it did not return to the level of normal controls as demonstrated with more total sway of their CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.001) as well as more sagittal head RoS (P = 0.048).Conclusion: This study confirms that surgical intervention for degenerative spondylolisthesis is effective at reducing disability, back and leg pain, demoralization, kinesiophobia, and fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity in patients with DLS. Furthermore, such patients exhibit a significantly more stable stance after surgery. However, balance parameters did not completely normalize by 3 months postoperatively.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Prospective cohort study.Objective: The purpose of this study is to quantify the extent of change in sway associated with maintaining a balanced posture within the cone of economy (CoE), in a group of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients' pre and postsurgery and compare them to matched non-scoliotic controls.Summary Of Background Data: Patients with spinal deformities adopt a variety of postural changes in the spine, pelvis, and lower extremities in their effort to compensate for the anterior shift in the gravity line. ADS patients are known to exhibit an increased sway within their CoE. Greater sway expends more energy while standing when compared with healthy controls. Spinal alignment surgery has been shown to improve sagittal vertical axis and balance.Methods: Thirty-three ADS patients and performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery along with 20 non-scoliotic control.Results: ADS patients demonstrated more initial CoM (P = 0.001) and head (P = 0.011) displacements. Postoperatively ADS patients exhibited less CoM sway (P = 0.043) and head sway (P = 0.050), in comparison to their presurgery measures. Postsurgical ADS patients demonstrated more CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.012) displacements and increased muscle activity in comparison to non-scoliotic controls.Conclusion: Surgical alignment reduced the amount of sway, reduced the center of mass displacement, and reduced spine and lower extremity energy expenditure in ADS' patients. In symptomatic preoperative ADS patients, sagittal sway increased along with greater lumbar spine and lower extremity neuromuscular activity in comparison to a non-scoliotic control. Although surgical alignment improved ADS functional parameters during a dynamic balance test, these parameters approached but did not fully achieve non-scoliotic control parameters when measured 3 months after surgery.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of sway associated with maintaining a balanced posture in a group of untreated cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients.Summary Of Background Data: Balance is defined as the ability of the human body to maintain its center of mass (COM) within the base of support with minimal postural sway. Sway is the movement of the COM in the horizontal plane when a person is standing in a static position. CSM patients have impaired body balance and proprioceptive loss.Methods: Thirty-two CSM patients performed a series of functional balance tests a week before surgery. Sixteen healthy controls (HCs) performed a similar balance test. Patients are instructed to stand erect with feet together and eyes opened in their self-perceived balanced and natural position for a full minute. All test subjects were fitted to a full-body reflective markers set and surface electromyography (EMG).Results: CSM patients had more COM sway in the anterior-posterior (CSM: 2.87 cm vs. C: 0.74 cm; P = 0.023), right-left (CSM: 5.16 cm vs. C: 2.51 cm; P = 0.003) directions as well as head sway (anterior-posterior - CSM: 2.17 cm vs. C: 0.82 cm; P = 0.010 and right-left - CSM: 3.66 cm vs. C: 1.69 cm; P = 0.044), more COM (CSM: 44.72 cm vs. HC: 19.26 cm, p = 0.001), and head (Pre: 37.87 cm vs. C: 19.93 cm, P = 0.001) total sway in comparison to controls. CSM patients utilized significantly more muscle activity to maintain static standing, evidenced by the increased trunk and lower extremity muscle activity (multifidus, erector spinae, rectus femoris, and tibialis anterior, P < 0.050) during 1-minute standing.Conclusion: In symptomatic CSM patients, COM and head total sway were significantly greater than controls. Individuals with CSM exhibit more trunk and lower extremity muscle activity, and thus expend more neuromuscular energy to maintain a balanced, static standing posture. This study is the first effort to evaluate global balance as a dynamic process in this patient population.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: .: Prospective cohort study.Objective: .: Analyze GRF parameters in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients to elucidate gait alterations as compared with healthy controls.Summary Of Background Data: .: During the human gait cycle, the magnitude and direction of the force each foot imparts on the ground varies in a controlled fashion to propel the body's center of mass forward. Alterations in GRF patterns can both point to subtle gait disturbances and explain altered gait patterns such as that seen in CSM.Methods: .: Thirty-two patients with symptomatic CSM who have been scheduled for surgery, along with 30 healthy controls (HC), underwent clinical gait analysis a week before surgery. Vertical GRF parameters and force magnitude and timing at various points of the gait cycle (i.e., heel contact, maximum weight acceptance, mid-stance, and push off) were analyzed and compared between groups.Results: .: Increased heel contact (CSM: 60.13% vs. HC: 27.82% of body weight, BW,P = 0.011), maximum weight acceptance (CSM: 120.13% vs. HC: 100.97% of BW, P = 0.016), and diminished push off (CSM: 91.35% vs. HC: 106.54% of BW, P = 0.001) forces were discovered in CSM patients compared with HC. Compared with controls CSM patients had delayed heel contact (CSM: 9.32% vs. HC: 5.12% of gait cycle, P = 0.050) and earlier push off (CSM: 54.96% vs. HC: 59.0% of gait cycle, P = 0.050), resulting in a shorter stance phase.Conclusion: .: This study reinforces how CSM patients commonly exhibit altered gait patterns, but also uniquely demonstrates the increased heel-contract and maximum weight acceptance forces, diminished toe-off forces, and the shorter stance phase to absorb the BW load. When examined from a global perspective, these altered GRF parameters reflect the difficulty CSM patients have with catching their center of mass during heel-contact to avoid falling and with subsequently propelling themselves forward.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: To examine the relationship of fear-avoidance beliefs and neuromuscular activity during gait in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients.Summary Of Background Data: Among patients with chronic spine pain, fear-avoidance beliefs are predictive of poor surgical outcomes. Fear-avoi occurs when patients perceive that movement will worsen underlying physical problems. This process leads them to restrict activity, which further heightens emotional distress. Patients with ADS have previously been shown to have an altered gait pattern. Electromyography is evolving into a useful tool to further our understanding of the pathologic manifestations of ADS during gait.Methods: Fifty ADS patients completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaire and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Surface electromyography electrodes were bilaterally placed on trunk and lower extremity muscles. Each patient performed a series of over-ground gait trials at a self-selected comfortable speed. Pearson Product Correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the self-reported fear of movement measures and the neuromuscular gait analysis biomechanical data.Results: The TSK total score and the FABQ physical were correlated with muscle onset of the External Oblique (P = 0.005), Gluteus Maximus (P = 0.018), Multifidi (P = 0.017), Erector Spinae (P = 0.014), Rectus Femoris (i = 0.008), Semitendinosus (P = 0.012), Tibilais Anterior (P = 0.012), and Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.010). Furthermore, the TSK total score, FABQ physical portion were correlated with muscle peak activity of Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.007), Multifidi (P = 0.014), and Tibilais Anterior (i = 0.050) and time to peak muscle activity of the Medial Gastrocnemius (P = 0.006) and Semitendinosus P = 0.038.Conclusion: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between neuromuscular gait parameters and fear-avoidance of movement which may reflect ADS patient experiences during ambulation. Further, it demonstrates that there are different aspects of fear-avoidance that may influence gait parameters. This study extends previous research on the role of fear-avoidance to include patients with spinal deformity.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective cohort study.Objective: The current study utilized quantitative gait analysis to examine the relationship of fear-avoidance beliefs to gait patterns in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).Summary Of Background Data: Among patients with chronic spine pain, fear-avoidance beliefs are predictive of behavioral deficiencies, poor work, and surgery outcomes. The impact of such beliefs on patients with major spinal deformity has yet to be investigated. Patients with ADS have previously been shown to have an altered gait pattern. Utilizing quantified gait analysis, this study aims to examine correlations between fear-avoidance and various aspects of gait in patients with ADS.Methods: Twenty-five ADS patients completed the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaire and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Each patient performed a series of overground gait trials at a self-selected comfortable speed. Pearson product correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the self-reported fear of movement measures and the objective gait analysis biomechanical data.Results: TSK score correlated strongly with gait speed, stride, step, double support times, and step length, and correlated moderately with cadence, and stride length. The FABQ physical portion strongly correlated with stride length and step length. The FABQ physical portion was moderately correlated with gait speed and single support time. The FABQ work portion was correlated with stride length and step length.Conclusion: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between biomechanical gait parameters, as measured with gait analysis, and fear-avoidance of movement, as measured with the TSK and FABQ. Further, it demonstrates that quantified gait analysis can be a useful tool to evaluate patients with spine deformity and to assess the outcomes of treatments in this group of patients. This study extends previous research on the role of fear-avoidance to include patients with spinal deformity.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective case series., Objective: To characterize the change in angle of trunk rotation (ATR), axial vertebral rotation (AVR), and body surface rotation (BSR) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with en-bloc derotation across multiple postoperative visits., Summary of Background Data: Previous research has documented ATR, AVR, and BSR correction for AIS patients after surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence on the sustainability of this correction over time., Methods: This was a retrospective study from a single-center prospective surface topographic registry of patients with AIS, age 11-20 at time of surgery, who underwent PSF with en-bloc derotation. Patients with previous spine surgery were excluded. ATR was measured with a scoliometer, AVR through EOS radiographic imaging, and BSR via surface topographic scanning, Data collection occurred at: preoperative, six-week, three-month, six-month, one-year, and two-year postoperative visits. BSR and AVR were tracked at the preoperative apical vertebral level, and the level with maximum deformity, at each respective timepoint. Generalized estimating equations models were used for statistical analysis. Covariates included age, sex, and body mass index., Results: 49 patients (73.4% female, mean age 14.6±2.2 years, mean preoperative coronal curve angle 57.9°±8.5, and 67% major thoracic) were evaluated. ATR correction was significantly improved at all postoperative timepoints and there was no significant loss of correction. AVR Max and AVR Apex were significantly improved at all timepoints but there was a significant loss of correction for AVR Apex between the six-week and one-year visit (P=0.032). BSR Max achieved significant improvement at the three-month visit. BSR Apex was significantly improved at the three-month and one-year visit., Conclusion: ATR and AVR demonstrated significant axial plane correction at two-years postoperative in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. BSR did not maintain significant improvement by the two-year visit., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)