Search

Background: Femur-shaft fracture treatment (FSFT) follows controversial management concepts after multiple trauma: primary-definitive osteosynthesis, secondary-definitive osteosynthesis after temporary external fixation (EF) in all patients, or individualized primary- or secondary-definitive osteosynthesis ("risk-adapted damage control orthopedics"). This study compares the concepts by analyzing literature evidence and a prospective multicenter database., Methods: A systematic literature analysis was performed. The German Trauma Society trauma registry was used to assess variables predictive of treatment concept., Results: Contradictory results in 63 controlled trials failed to support a "generalized management strategy." In all, 1,465 FSFTs in 8,057 trauma registry patients (age 39 +/- 19.5 years; Injury Severity Score [ISS] 23.5 +/- 14.9; 17.3% mortality) were treated initially (<24 hour) by EF, nail, or plate in 47.0%, 41.1%, and 11.9%, respectively. Despite large interhospital variability, EF was more likely with increasing severity of ISS, Glasgow Coma Score, thorax trauma, base excess, coagulation abnormalities, and initial probability of death., Conclusions: Clinical "reality" reflects the controversies of "scientific evidence" for FSFT after multiple trauma in Germany. Although decision making is currently based on unvalidated criteria, anatomic and physiologic injury severity appears to influence the choice of management concept.

Objective: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is associated with substantial postoperative morbidity as a result of infectious complications. In a prior phase II study, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was shown to improve leukocyte function and to reduce infection rates after esophagectomy. The aim of the current randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial was to investigate the clinical efficacy of perioperative G-CSF administration in reducing infection and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer., Patients and Methods: One hundred fifty five patients with resectable esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to perioperative G-CSF at standard doses (77 patients) or placebo (76 patients), administered from 2 days before until day 7 after esophagectomy. The G-CSF and placebo groups were comparable as regards age, gender, risk, cancer stage, frequency of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, and type of esophagectomy (transthoracic or transhiatal esophageal resection)., Results: Of 155 randomized patients, 153 were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. The rate of infection occurring within the first 10 days after esophagectomy was 43.4% (confidence interval 32.8-55.9%) in the placebo and 44.2% (confidence interval 32.1-55.3%) in the G-CSF group (P = 0.927). 30-day mortality amounted to 5.2% in the G-CSF group versus 5.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.985). Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis., Conclusion: Perioperative administration of G-CSF failed to reduce postoperative morbidity, infection rate, or mortality in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy.

Purpose of Review: This review focuses on developments in airway management and concious sedation/analgesic techniques employed by anesthesiologists in the emergency department., Recent Findings: Emergency medicine physicians routinely employ airway devices and techniques that were previously reserved for anesthesiologists. An understanding of the uses and limitations of these devices are essential for successful outcomes. Anesthesiologists responding to the emergency department may be faced with soiled or traumatized airways. The use of newer devices in cervical trauma and the difficult airway is reviewed. Consious sedation in the emergency department is also reviewed. There are no published recommendations demonstrating the advantage of specific agents for sedation in the emergency department. A wide variety of medications and techniques are currently being employed. Studies indicate that the incidence of adverse effects from these agents range from less than 1% to almost 30%. Various organizations have published guidelines detailing the appropriate protocols and equipment that must be present in the emergency department to monitor patients undergoing conscious sedation. These recommendations have not been universally implemented, and several recent studies suggest that a substantial number of emergency departments may have major deficiencies., Summary: The consultant anesthesiologist responding to a critical airway may face a variety of challenges, including traumatized or soiled airways, patients with cervical spine fractures, and patients who have undergone sedation techniques that may have progressed to deep and general anesthesia. Anesthesiologists may also face the challenge of responding to these emergent situations without all the equipment or adequately trained support staff necessary to handle those emergencies safely.

Our objective was to investigate the levels of chemokines (MIP1-alpha, MCP-1, and Gro-alpha), Interleukin-18 (IL-18), and Interleukin (IL-6) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serum at the onset and ongoing states of sepsis as defined by the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine in septic surgical ICU patients. Our summary background data was to understand the significance of compartmentalized inflammatory mediator production in an immunologically active organ (lung) in comparison with levels in the systemic circulation. The study group consisted of 20 septic patients and 10 non-septic patients on surgical ICU. At the onset of sepsis, both BAL fluid and serum samples were taken and levels of MIP-1alpha, MCP-1, GRO-alpha, IL-18, and IL-6 were measured by ELISA. Furthermore, over a subsequent 8-day period, levels of these mediators were determined in serum. In some experiments, IL-18 mRNA levels were determined in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of septic and non-septic patients. At the onset of sepsis, MIP-1alpha, MCP-1, GRO-alpha, IL-18, and IL-6 levels were significantly up-regulated in BAL fluid as compared with non-septic controls. In marked contrast, with the exception of IL-18 mRNA and IL-6 peptide, there was no increase in serum levels of inflammatory mediators determined both at the onset and during the ongoing states of sepsis. Based on the present data, monitoring levels of serum chemokines and IL-18 protein as markers of sepsis might be misleading since despite their non-detection in serum, they were highly up-regulated in the lung tissue compartment. These data might underscore the role of MIP-1alpha, MCP-1, GRO-alpha, and IL-18 in the mediation of local tissue damage. Furthermore, these findings raise the notion that mediator measurement in immunologically active organs might serve as pivotal indicators of sepsis prior to the actual fulfillment of specific clinical criteria that defines the patient as being septic.