Search

Increased utilization of prescription opioids for pain management has led to a nationwide public health crisis with alarming rates of addiction and opioid-related deaths. In the surgical setting, opioid prescriptions have been implicated as a contributing factor to the opioid epidemic. The authors developed an innovative model to address aspects of pain management and opioid utilization during preoperative evaluation, acute surgical hospitalization, and postoperative follow-up for chronic opioid users. This program involves multidisciplinary teams that include acute and chronic pain specialists, psychiatrists, integrative medicine specialists, and physical medicine and rehabilitation services. It also features a novel infrastructure for triage and pain management education and treatment. Individualized patient plans are devised that can include preoperative opioid weaning, regional anesthesia that minimizes opioid use, and multimodal techniques for surgical pain treatment. Multidisciplinary programs such as this have the potential to both improve perioperative pain control and prevent escalation of opioid use among chronic opioid users. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to establish if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and fast track surgery (FTS) protocols are associated with reduction in healthcare-associated infection (HAIs). Background: Evidence suggests that prevention strategies for HAIs should be multifaceted and transdisciplinary. ERAS and FTS protocols are collaborative approaches to perioperative care which reduce length of stay but may also be an effective strategy for reducing HAIs. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials involving either ERAS or FTS for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Primary outcome included postoperative incidence of 3 major HAIs: lung infection (LI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and surgical site infection (SSI). Results: Among all included trials, ERAS/FTS was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative LI [risk ratio (RR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.23–0.61; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%], UTI (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.23–0.76; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%), and SSI (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.58–0.98; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) compared with conventional controls. Sensitivity analysis performed following the exclusion of high risk of bias publications did not appreciably affect these results. ERAS/FTS was also associated with a significant decrease in hospital length of stay (standard mean difference = −0.83; 95% CI = −0.92 to −0.75; P < 0.0001; P for heterogeneity <0.0001, I2 = 93%). Subgroup analysis of trials involving colorectal surgery and open incision also resulted in significant reduction in all 3 HAIs among ERAS/FTS compared with conventional counterparts. Conclusions: Our results suggest ERAS/FTS protocols are powerful tools to prevent HAIs. Further study is needed to establish the mechanism. Providers should consider adoption of similar transdisciplinary programs to reduce perioperative HAIs and at the same time improve the value of surgical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The clinical benefits of intraoperative low tidal volume (LTV) mechanical ventilation with concomittent positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intermittent recruitment maneuvers-termed "protective lung ventilation" (PLV)-have not been investigated systematically in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods: Our group performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies (n = 1054) comparing LTV (n = 521) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 533) for associated postoperative incidence of atelectasis, lung infection, acute lung injury (ALI), and length of hospital stay. A secondary analysis of 3 studies comparing PLV (n = 248) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 247) was performed. Results: Although intraoperative LTV ventilation was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative lung infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.68; P = 0.003) compared with a conventional strategy, no difference was noted between groups in incidence of postoperative ALI (OR=0.38; 95% CI, 0.10-1.52; P=0.17) or atelectasis (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.26-2.81; P = 0.80). Analysis of trials involving protective ventilation (LTV + PEEP + recruitment maneuvers) showed a statistically significant reduction in incidence of postoperative lung infection (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.50; P = 0.0003), atelectasis (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64; P = 0.006), and ALI (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = 0.008) and length of hospital stay (Mean Difference=-2.08; 95% CI, -3.95 to -0.21; P = 0.03) compared with conventional ventilation. Conclusions: Intraoperative LTV ventilation in conjunction with PEEP and intermittent recruitment maneuvers is associated with significantly improved clinical pulmonary outcomes and reduction in length of hospital stay in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general surgery. Providers should consider application of all the 3 elements for a comprehensive protective ventilation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest, Funding: Please see DISCLOSURES at the end of this article.

Purpose of Review: Numerous recent trials have examined the potential benefits of treating cardiac surgery patients with a minimally invasive approach. Recently, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has also been applied to cardiac surgery, and specifically to minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) patients. This review will explore current evidence regarding MICS, as well as the combination of MICS plus ERAS., Recent Findings: Multiple contemporary prospective and retrospective trials have published data demonstrating equivalent or better outcomes with reduced length of stay (LOS) for MICS patients compared to patients undergoing full sternotomy. In fact, recent reviews and met-analyses suggest that MICS is associated with reduced atrial fibrillation, wound complications, blood transfusion, LOS, and potentially cost. Additionally, several new trials reporting longer term follow-up on MICS coronary and valve surgery have demonstrated durable results. Emerging literature on the benefits of combining MICS and ERAS perioperative protocols have also reported promising results regarding reduced LOS and faster recovery., Summary: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery appears to provide patients with equivalent or better outcomes, faster recovery, and less surgical trauma compared to full sternotomy. The addition of ERAS phase specific perioperative protocols can help maximize the benefits of MICS., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Cardiac surgery has traditionally relied upon invasive hemodynamic monitoring, including regular use of pulmonary artery catheters. More recently, there has been advancement in our understanding as well as broader adoption of less invasive alternatives. This review serves as an outline of the key perioperative hemodynamic monitoring options for cardiac surgery., Recent Findings: Recent study has revealed that the use of invasive monitoring such as pulmonary artery catheters or transesophageal echocardiography in low-risk patients undergoing low-risk cardiac surgery is of questionable benefit. Lesser invasive approaches such a pulse contour analysis or ultrasound may provide a useful alternative to assess patient hemodynamics and guide resuscitation therapy. A number of recent studies have been published to support broader indication for these evolving technologies., Summary: More selective use of indwelling catheters for cardiac surgery has coincided with greater application of less invasive alternatives. Understanding the advantages and limitations of each tool allows the bedside clinician to identify which hemodynamic monitoring modality is most suitable for which patient., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: This review highlights the integration of enhanced recovery principles with temporary mechanical circulatory support associated with adult cardiac surgery., Recent Findings: Enhanced recovery elements and efforts have been associated with improvements in quality and value. Temporary mechanical circulatory support technologies have been successfully employed, improved, and the value of their proactive use to maintain hemodynamic goals and preserve long-term myocardial function is accruing., Summary: Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices promise to enhance recovery by mitigating the risk of complications, such as postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, organ dysfunction, and death, associated with adult cardiac surgery., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Regional anesthesia is gaining attention as a valuable component of multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia in cardiac surgery, where improving the patient's quality of recovery while minimizing the harms of opioid administration are key points of emphasis in perioperative care. This review serves as an outline of recent advancements in a variety of applications of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery., Recent Findings: Growing interest in regional analgesia, particularly the use of newer "chest wall blocks", has led to accumulating evidence for the efficacy of multiple regional techniques in cardiac surgery. These include a variety of technical approaches, with results consistently demonstrating optimized pain control and reduced opioid requirements. Regional and pain management experts have worked to derive consensus around nerve block nomenclature, which will be foundational to establish best practice, design and report future research consistently, improve medical education, and generally advance our knowledge in this vital area of perioperative patient care., Summary: The field of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery has matured over the last several years. A variety of regional techniques have been described and shown to be efficacious as part of the multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to pain management in the cardiac surgical setting., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinical benefits of intraoperative low tidal volume (LTV) mechanical ventilation with concomittent positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and intermittent recruitment maneuvers-termed "protective lung ventilation" (PLV)-have not been investigated systematically in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general anesthesia., Methods: Our group performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies (n = 1054) comparing LTV (n = 521) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 533) for associated postoperative incidence of atelectasis, lung infection, acute lung injury (ALI), and length of hospital stay. A secondary analysis of 3 studies comparing PLV (n = 248) with conventional lung ventilation (n = 247) was performed., Results: Although intraoperative LTV ventilation was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative lung infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.68; P = 0.003) compared with a conventional strategy, no difference was noted between groups in incidence of postoperative ALI (OR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.10-1.52; P = 0.17) or atelectasis (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.26-2.81; P = 0.80). Analysis of trials involving protective ventilation (LTV + PEEP + recruitment maneuvers) showed a statistically significant reduction in incidence of postoperative lung infection (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.50; P = 0.0003), atelectasis (OR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64; P = 0.006), and ALI (OR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.61; P = 0.008) and length of hospital stay (Mean Difference = -2.08; 95% CI, -3.95 to -0.21; P = 0.03) compared with conventional ventilation., Conclusions: Intraoperative LTV ventilation in conjunction with PEEP and intermittent recruitment maneuvers is associated with significantly improved clinical pulmonary outcomes and reduction in length of hospital stay in otherwise healthy patients undergoing general surgery. Providers should consider application of all the 3 elements for a comprehensive protective ventilation strategy.