Search

Objective: The authors report no conflicts of interest.To determine baseline sleep characteristics of male/female student-athletes across multiple sports using objective and subjective measures. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Division I college. Participants: Eighty-two male and female Division I student-athletes. Interventions: Participants completed 2 validated sleep questionnaires (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] and Single-Item Sleep Quality Scale [SISQS]) to assess subjective sleep. They also wore a validated sleep monitoring device (WHOOP 4.0 band) for at least 14 nights to collect objective data on total sleep time (TST) and sleep architecture. Main outcome measures: Overnight sleep variables, including TST, time spent awake in bed after falling asleep, time spent in light sleep, rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, and slow-wave sleep (SWS) cycles. Sleep quality and daytime sleepiness were also assessed. Results: There were no statistical differences between male and female student-athletes in average TST, sleep architecture, sleep consistency, SISQS, and ESS scores. The average TST was 409.2 ± 36.3 minutes. Sleep architecture consisted of 25.6% REM, 19.9% SWS, and 54.4% light sleep. The average sleep consistency was 61.6% ± 8.9%. The average SISQS score was 6.48 ± 1.71, and the average ESS score was 7.57 ± 3.82. A significant difference was found in average wake time between males and females (55.0 vs 43.7 min, P = 0.020), with an overall average of 50.2 ± 16.2 minutes. Conclusions: College student-athletes do not typically obtain the recommended amount of sleep. Optimizing sleep can positively affect academic and athletic performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Connell-Jones Endowed Chair Diversity Nursing Research Scholars Program was created to promote engagement in nursing research and scholarship among nurses of color. Preliminary evaluation suggests that the program was widely beneficial, resulting in enrollment in doctoral education for some. Establishing opportunities that promote exposure and participation in nursing research and scholarship among nurses of color helps cultivate cohorts of diverse nurses armed to address health disparities through the advancement of nursing knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: There is interest in incorporating digital health technology in routine practice. We integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives to describe implementation determinants (barriers and facilitators) regarding digital health technology use to facilitate exercise behavior change for people with Parkinson disease in outpatient physical therapy. Methods: The purposeful sample included people with Parkinson disease (n = 13), outpatient physical therapists (n = 12), and advanced technology stakeholders including researchers and reimbursement specialists (n = 13). Semistructured interviews were used to elicit implementation determinants related to using digital health technology for activity monitoring and exercise behavior change. Deductive codes based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were used to describe implementation determinants. Results: Key implementation determinants were similar across stakeholder groups. Essential characteristics of digital health technology included design quality and packaging, adaptability, complexity, and cost. Implementation of digital health technology by physical therapists and people with Parkinson disease was influenced by their knowledge, attitudes, and varied confidence levels in using digital health technology. Inner setting organizational determinants included available resources and access to knowledge/information. Process determinants included device interoperability with medical record systems and workflow integration. Outer setting barriers included lack of external policies, regulations, and collaboration with device companies. Discussion and Conclusions: Future implementation interventions should address key determinants, including required processes for how and when physical therapists instruct people with Parkinson disease on digital health technology, organizational readiness, workflow integration, and characteristics of physical therapists and people with Parkinson disease who may have ingrained beliefs regarding their ability and willingness to use digital health technology. Although site-specific barriers should be addressed, digital health technology knowledge translation tools tailored to individuals with varied confidence levels may be generalizable across clinics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this studywas to present best practices for substance use disorder (SUD) screening and treatment in the juvenile justice setting. Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews, informed by the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior Model, were conducted with medical and behavioral health providers with experience caring for justice-involved youth. Interviews were analyzed using thematic and content analysis to elucidate best practices and identify facilitators and barriers affecting implementation of evidence-based substance use screening and treatment. Results: We interviewed 14 participants from 12 unique institutions and 9 states. All participants described the populations in their facilities as predominatelymale and minoritized, with substance use being an exceedingly common problem. Eight main themes emerged fromanalysis of the barriers and facilitators discussed by participants. These included the importance of (1) ensuring substance use-specific training for all team members, (2) integrating medical and behavioral health care, (3) addressing staff reticence and stigma, (4) building an institutional culture that supports screening and treatment, (5) dedicating adequate resources with respect to time, staffing, and funding, (6) formalizing and standardizing screening and treatment protocols, (7) engaging youth using trauma-informed approaches that emphasize youth strengths and autonomy, and (8) collaborating with multidisciplinary teams and community partners to maximize linkage to follow-up care after release. Conclusions: Our findings highlight an urgent need for improved implementation of evidence-based, developmentally appropriate substance use treatment for justice-involved youth. Although the majority of participants screen youth, they described variable implementation of behavioral health interventions and limited provision of on-site withdrawal management and treatment using medications for SUD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]