Search

Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Introduction: Transcranial sonography (TCS) is a bedside examination which is currently used in multiple neurocritical care settings. Third ventricle ultrasound is usually a simple technique, though a large insonation angle could lead to an overestimation of third ventricular diameter. The aim of this study was to use a mathematical model to evaluate the impact of probe inclination on the false positive rate when using TCS to evaluate third ventricle enlargement., Methods: Using R software, we simulated a pool of 100,000 fictitious patients with a normal third ventricle size (diameter from 0 to 9 mm) in daily follow-up for ventricle enlargement for 30 consecutive days using TCS. Each day, a different, random insonation angle (α) was generated and a corresponding measured diameter calculated as: measured diameter=real diameter/cos α. If the measured diameter was >9.0 mm, the simulation registered a "misdiagnosis" episode and the simulation loop was interrupted; otherwise, the simulation continued to its thirtieth iteration., Results: Of the 100,000 "patient" simulations, 30,905 (30.9%) had an erroneous TCS diagnosis of ventricular enlargement. Angles of insonation >35 degrees contributed to 79.3% of the total misdiagnoses of ventricular enlargement (false positive rate, 3.71%), whereas misdiagnosis was rare when the insonation angle was ≤15 degrees (1.30% of the total misdiagnoses; false positive rate, 0.06%)., Conclusion: Using probe inclinations <15 degrees, erroneous diagnosis of third ventricular enlargement was rare. Our results suggest that TCS has a low rate of false positives when the angle of insonation is minimized., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Retracted articles represent research withdrawn from the existing body of literature after publication. Research articles may be retracted for several reasons ranging from honest errors to intentional misconduct. They should not be used as reliable sources, and it is unclear why they are cited occasionally by other articles. This study hypothesized that several mechanisms may contribute to citing retracted literature and aimed to analyze the characteristics of articles citing retracted literature in anesthesiology and critical care., Methods: Using the Retraction Watch database, we retrieved retracted articles on anesthesiology and intensive care medicine up to August 16, 2021, and identified the papers citing these retracted articles. A survey designed to investigate the reasons for citing these articles was sent to the corresponding authors of the citing papers., Results: We identified 478 retracted articles, 220 (46%) of which were cited at least once. We contacted 1297 corresponding authors of the papers that cited these articles, 417 (30%) of whom responded to our survey and were included in the final analysis. The median number of authors in the analyzed articles was five, and the median elapsed time from retraction to citation was 3 yr. Most of the corresponding authors (372, 89%) were unaware of the retracted status of the cited article, mainly because of inadequate notification of the retraction status in journals and/or databases and the use of stored copies., Conclusions: The corresponding authors were generally unaware of the retraction of the cited article, usually because of inadequate identification of the retracted status in journals and/or web databases and the use of stored copies. Awareness of this phenomenon and rigorous control of the cited references before submitting a paper are of fundamental importance in research., (Copyright © 2022, the American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.