Search

Background: Many insurance companies in the United States rely on the Schnur sliding scale to predict resection weights to determine medical necessity for breast reduction surgery. Accurate methods to predict resection weights are needed to avoid insurance denials. The authors compared the accuracy of formulas such as the Schnur, Appel, Descamps, and Galveston scales in predicting resection weights, and assessed whether they influence insurance coverage decision., Methods: A retrospective review of bilateral reduction mammaplasty procedures from June of 2017 to June of 2019 was performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Oncoplastic reduction operations were excluded. The accuracy of each formula-based estimate was evaluated with linear regression analysis., Results: One hundred fifty-four patients (308 breasts) were reviewed. The Schnur scale had low correlation with actual resection weight ( r2 = 0.381; b1 = 1.153; p < 0.001). The Appel scale was the most accurate ( r2 = 0.642; b1 = 1.01; p < 0.001), followed by the Descamps ( r2 = 0.572, b1 = 0.934, p < 0.001) and Galveston ( r2 = 0.672; b 1 = 0.654; p < 0.001) scales. The Appel, Descamps, and Galveston scales were more accurate for resection weights of 500 g or greater, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m², and patients younger than 50 years. For resection weights of 500 g or greater, the median difference between the estimated and actual resection weight for the Schnur, Appel, Descamps, and Galveston scales was -211.4 ± 272.3, -17.5 ± 272.3, -9.6 ± 229.5, and -99.2 ± 238.5 g, respectively. No scale was accurate for resection weights less than 500 g. Insurance reimbursement was denied in 15.56 percent of patients; of these, 23 percent had resection weights less than 500 g. The Schnur scale overestimated the resection weights in 28.9 percent of patients., Conclusions: The Schnur scale is a poor predictor of breast resection weight. The Appel scale is the most accurate estimator, especially in the young and obese population with larger resections., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Diagnostic, I., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Oculoorbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis has similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. The authors hypothesized that these two conditions have specific individual influences as they relate to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons., Methods: A total of 133 preoperative computed tomography scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n = 10; controls, n = 52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed., Results: Orbital cavity volume was mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7 percent, p = 0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes [17 percent (p = 0.002) and 21 percent (p = 0.005), respectively]. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome was wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p = 0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients, however, was narrower (p = 0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length was more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21 percent, p = 0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26 percent, p < 0.001). The posterior nasal spine position was retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39 percent, p < 0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position was similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes., Conclusions: Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expanded the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, whereas Crouzon syndrome had more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome developed maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Visual impairment secondary to orbital and periorbital dysmorphology is frequent in Pfeiffer syndrome patients. The etiopathogenesis of this aberrancy, however, remains unclear., Methods: Untreated Pfeiffer syndrome patients (n = 31) and normal control subjects (n = 43) were compared. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbital and periorbital anatomy were performed using Materialise (Leuven, Belgium) software., Results: Overall, orbital cavity volume of Pfeiffer patients is reduced by 28 percent (p < 0.001), compared to normal, starting before 3 months of age (p = 0.004). Globe volume was diminished by 10 percent (p = 0.041) before 3 months of age, yet tended to catch up thereafter. However, the retrobulbar soft-tissue volume remained smaller beyond 1 year of age (17 percent, p = 0.003). Globe volume projection beyond the bony orbit increased in all observed ages (82 percent, p < 0.001). The volumes of sphenoid bone, maxilla, and mandible proportionately were restricted by 24 to 25 percent (p = 0.003 to 0.035) before 3 months of age. The volume of maxilla and mandible gradually approximate normal; however, the sphenoid bone volume in Pfeiffer patients remains less than normal (p = 0.002) into childhood. The anteroposterior length of both the zygoma and the maxilla was reduced by 14 percent (p < 0.001). Anterior positioning of the zygoma is less by 23 percent (p < 0.001) in Pfeiffer patients overall, with anterior positioning of maxilla reduced similarly by 23 percent (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Pfeiffer syndrome patients develop decreased retrobulbar soft-tissue and globe volume, along with a restricted orbital cavity volume in infancy. Significant hypoplasia of the sphenoid bone is associated with more severe central facial (maxilla) retrusion, compared to lateral facial structures (zygoma)., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Since its first description in 2012, the Goldilocks procedure has become an option for immediate breast reconstruction, particularly for obese patients who are poor candidates for traditional implant or autologous reconstruction. In this work, the authors performed a longitudinal study of patients who underwent mastectomy with Goldilocks reconstruction to assess the incidence of additional surgical procedures, and to assess surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction., Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure only at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January of 2012 and September of 2019 was performed. Demographics, complications, additional breast procedures performed to attain the final results, and patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q were recorded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify statistical associations and risk factors., Results: Sixty-three patients (108 breasts) were included. Mean age was 57.8 years. Mean body mass index was 37.6 kg/m2. Median follow-up time after the mastectomy with the Goldilocks procedure was 15 months. The major complication rate within the first 30 days was 9.3 percent. Forty-four breasts (40.7 percent) underwent additional surgery. Dyslipidemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of additional surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; p = 0.045). Scores in the four BREAST-Q domains were not statistically different between patients who had additional procedures and those who did not., Conclusions: Based on the results, the authors recommend a thorough preoperative discussion with patients who are candidates for the Goldilocks procedure to explore all options for reconstruction and their expectations, because it is crucial to reduce the necessity for additional operations in this high-risk population., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, III., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Archeological archives report cranioplasty as 1 of the oldest surgical procedures; however, it was not until the last century that true advances have been made. Alternative approaches are necessary to achieve optimal closure of the defect with fewer adverse effects. We aim to evaluate the use of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) alone or seeded in scaffolds as the main treatment for cranial bone defects and to assess human patient outcomes., Methods: A systematic review was performed by querying PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases with the MeSH terms: "adipose-derived stem cells," "cranial bone defect," "stromal vascular factor," "fat grafting," as well as synonyms in combinations determined by our search strategy. We included human models that used hADSCs as primary therapy. We excluded studies in languages other than English., Results: One hundred ninety-four studies were identified after removal of duplicates. Four articles that used hADSCs as the main therapy to treat calvarial defects in humans were included. One article applied the cell therapy alone, and 3 used β-tricalcium phosphate granules as a scaffold to seed the hADSCs., Conclusions: Bone regeneration was reached in a short and intermediate period using autologous hADSCs in humans with no major adverse effects in all 4 articles included. A long-term follow-up study (6 years) exhibited late infections and reabsorption of the β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold seeded with hADSCs., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Purpose: Classic features of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) described in the literature include a prominent nasal bridge, eyelid ptosis, telorbitism, maxillary hypoplasia, and mandibular prognathism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objectively the bony features of SCS., Methods: Preoperative computer tomography scans of 15 SCS patients, 23 normal controls, 13 bicoronal nonsyndromic, and 7 unicoronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients were included for analysis. Unaffected controls and nonsyndromic patients were age- and sex-matched to SCS patients. Morphometric cephalometrics were analyzed using three-dimensional computer tomography reconstructions. Mann-Whitney U were used to compare facial measurements between SCS and normal and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis controls., Results: Telorbitism was present in bicoronal SCS patients only (P = 0.04) but absent in the unicoronal and bicoronal/metopic cohorts. The angle of the nasal bone relative to the sella was not different between SCS and controls (P = 0.536), although the angle of the nasal bone relative to the forehead was decreased in SCS by 15.5° (P < 0.001). Saethre-Chotzen syndrome had a 2.6° maxillary retrusion relative to controls (P = 0.03). In addition, SCS patients aged 4 to 7 months had a wider (39.34 versus 35.04, P = 0.017) and anteroposteriorly foreshortened (32.12 versus 35.06, P = 0.039) maxilla. There was no difference in mandibular prognathism among SCS patients as measured by the sella-nasion-B point angle compared to controls (P = 0.705)., Conclusions: Despite classic descriptions, on morphometric analysis SCS patients did not demonstrate consistency across all suture subtypes in terms of telorbitism, a broad nasal bridge, or mandibular prognathism. Rather, SCS subtypes of SCS based on suture pathology more closely resemble nonsyndromic patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for complications in breast reconstruction. Thus, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction in obese women may be controversial. The authors analyzed obese patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomy using Wise-pattern incisions (Goldilocks procedure) and compared outcomes between two groups: Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction and Goldilocks only., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher who underwent the Goldilocks procedure at the Mayo Clinic Health System from 2012 to 2019. Data were extracted from electronic medical records. Minor complications (partial-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, or tissue expander/implant malposition) and major complications (full-thickness wound dehiscence or flap necrosis, capsular contracture, tissue expander/implant explantation, or unplanned reoperation or readmission) were compared between groups. Patient-reported outcomes using BREAST-Q questionnaires were also assessed., Results: One hundred five patients (181 breasts) were included. Mean ± SEM age and body mass index were 57.1 ± 10.4 years and 37.9 ± 5.8 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks-only group and 51.5 ± 1.1 years and 35.5 ± 0.4 kg/m2 for the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group, respectively. Median follow-up time was 15.1 months (interquartile range, 10.0 to 28.6 months). Overall, 96 breasts underwent the Goldilocks-only procedure and 85 Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction. Multivariable analyses revealed a higher rate of minor complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.83; 95 percent CI, 1.22 to 7.02) and major complications (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.26; 95 percent CI, 1.25 to 4.24) in the Goldilocks with immediate breast reconstruction group compared with the Goldilocks-only group, at any given time. Patient satisfaction was not statistically different between groups., Conclusions: The Goldilocks procedure is a feasible breast reconstructive option in obese patients; however, when it is performed with immediate breast reconstruction, it is associated with higher rates of complications. For patients with a body mass index of 40 kg/m2 or greater, the authors recommend the Goldilocks-only procedure or delayed reconstruction., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Little is known about the detailed growth of the cranial fossae, even though they provide an important structural connection between the cranial vault and the facial skeleton. This study details the morphologic development of isolated cranial vault synostosis and associated syndromes on cranial fossa development., Methods: A total of 125 computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 24; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; and controls, n = 54). Three-dimensional analyses were produced using Materialise software., Results: The regional anterior and middle cranial fossae volumes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are characterized by significant increases of 43 percent (p < 0.001) and 60 percent (p < 0.001), respectively, and normal posterior cranial fossa volume. The cranial fossae depths of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis were increased, by 37, 42, and 21 percent (all p < 0.001) for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae, respectively, accompanying the shortened cranial fossae lengths. The volume and morphology of all cranial fossae in Apert syndrome nearly paralleled nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. However, Crouzon syndrome had reduced depths of cranial fossae, and more restricted fossa volumes than both Apert syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis., Conclusions: Cranial vault suture synostosis is likely to be more influential on cranial fossae development than other associated influences (genetic, morphologic) in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Isolated Apert syndrome pathogenesis is associated with an elongation of the anterior cranial fossa length in infants, whereas in Crouzon syndrome, there is a tendency to reduce cranial fossa depth, suggesting individual adaptability in cranial fossae development related to vault synostosis., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Abstract: We describe the clinical case of a 62-year-old man with an atypical grade II meningioma, invading bone and scalp, and present a step-by-step video description of a modified technique for cranioplasty and scalp reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap. By using this technique, we aim to minimize the space between the dura and the flap, which would decrease the risk of fluid collections and infections., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Financial key performance indicators are often used to evaluate performance. Understanding of key performance indicators can be crucial for career advancement and bargaining leverage in resource negotiations. This study aimed to identify the most important key performance indicators used in surgical funding requests and understand how to use these metrics in clinical practice., Methods: In two tertiary medical centers, funding requests for surgeon gap support (2019 to 2020) and equipment (2017 to 2019) within departments of surgery were reviewed. The requesting department, approval status, and amount allotted were recorded. In requests for gap support, projections for contribution margin, operating room volume, charges, collections, and relative value units were tracked. Projected contribution margin and cost savings were recorded for equipment funding requests., Results: There were 40 gap support and 24 equipment requests, and all were approved. Most gap support requests included collections (90.0 percent), charges (87.5 percent), operating room cases (80.0 percent), relative value units (77.5 percent), and hospital contribution margin (77.5 percent). The most represented departments were general surgery (37.5 percent), neurosurgery (22.5 percent), and plastic surgery (15.0 percent). The departments that submitted the most equipment requests were general surgery (28.0 percent) and neurosurgery (28.0 percent). Most requests included projections for contribution margin (95.8 percent) and cost savings (87.4 percent). Projected hospital contribution margin correlated with the amount of funds allotted for surgeon support (r = 0.409; p = 0.022)., Conclusions: This multicenter study identified the importance of using key performance indicators for a successful financial outcome in funding requests. In addition, the authors demonstrate the need for surgeons to understand their own key performance indicators. Surgeons should advocate for increased transparency to better understand their financial contributions and performance., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Pfeiffer syndrome is a rare syndromic craniosynostosis disorder, with a wide range of clinical manifestations. This study aims to investigate the structural abnormalities of cranial fossa and skull base development in Pfeiffer patients, to provide an anatomic basis for surgical interventions., Method: Thirty preoperative CT scans of Pfeiffer syndrome patients were compared to 35 normal controls. Subgroup comparisons, related to differing suture synostosis, were performed., Results: Overall, the volume of anterior and middle cranial fossae in Pfeiffer patients were increased by 31% (P < 0.001) and 19% (P = 0.004), versus controls. Volume of the posterior fossa in Pfeiffer patients was reduced by 14% (P = 0.026). When only associated with bicoronal synostosis, Pfeiffer syndrome patients developed enlarged anterior (68%, P = 0.001) and middle (40%, P = 0.031) fossae. However, sagittal synostosis cases only developed an enlarged anterior fossa (47%, P < 0.001). The patients with solely bilateral squamosal synostosis, developed simultaneous reduced anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae volume (all P ≤ 0.002). The overall skull base angulation, measured on both intracranial and subcranial surfaces, grew normally., Conclusion: Enlarged anterior cranial fossae in Pfeiffer syndrome children is evident, except for the squamosal synostosis cases which developed reduced volume in all fossae. Volume of the middle cranial fossa is influenced by associated cranial vault suture synostosis, specifically, sagittal synostosis cases develop normal middle fossa volume, while the bicoronal cases develop increased middle fossa volume. Posterior cranial fossa development is restricted by shortened posterior cranial base length. Surgical intervention in Pfeiffer syndrome patients optimally should be indexed to different suture synostosis., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Little is known about the detailed growth of the sphenoidal and temporal bones, even though they contribute significantly to the cranial base and cranial fossa skeletons. They also serve to connect the cranial vault with facial structure. This study details their morphologic development in isolated bicoronal synostosis and associated syndromes., Methods: Eighty-one CT scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 28; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 19; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 8; and controls, n = 26), and measured using Materialize software., Results: Sphenoidal and temporal bone volumes in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are reduced 23% (P = 0.005) and 24%(P = 0.003) at 6 months of age, compared to controls. Apert and Crouzon syndrome patients developed similar reduced volumes. The greater wing of the sphenoid and pterygoid processes in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are initially inferiorly rotated at 2 months of age, by 9.60° (P = 0.002) and 4.33° (P = 0.023), respectively. In Apert syndrome, these rotations were reduced by 4.82° (P = 0.003) and 12.60° (P < 0.001), (like Crouzon syndrome). However, in Apert syndrome, the length of pterygoid processes is shortened by 11% (P = 0.018) compared to nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Crouzon syndrome skulls did not develop a statistically significant shortening relative to nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Mediolateral expansion of the sphenoid in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis was less than normal (P = 0.023), and it was further reduced in syndromic skulls., Conclusion: Isolated bicoronal synostosis tends to reduce the volume of sphenoidal and temporal bones, and inferior and posterior rotation of the entire sphenoid. Syndromic conditions restrict sphenoidal rotation, and limit the expansion of sphenoidal greater wing and pterygoid plate., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Racial disparity in pathological consequences in skull growth may impact the treatment plan for different patient populations. This study attempts to explore the differences between Asian and Caucasian cranial morphology in Crouzon syndrome., Method: Ninety-one computed tomographic scans were included (Asian Crouzon syndrome, n = 12; Asian controls, n = 22; Caucasian Crouzon syndrome, n = 16; Caucasian controls, n = 41), and measured using Mimics and 3-matics software., Results: The entire cranial base length was reduced 11.92 mm (P = 0.004) in Asian Crouzon patients, and 14.58 mm (P < 0.001) in Caucasian Crouzon patients, compared to respective controls. The cranial base angle on the facial side of basicranium was more narrowed in Crouzon syndrome in both races, with similar changes of degrees (9.61°, P = 0.002, in Asian Crouzon; 9.20°, P = 0.019, in Caucasian Crouzon). However, the intracranial side was statistically more narrowed only in the Asian group (9.86°, P = 0.003). Both Asian and Caucasian Crouzon patients developed reduced posterior fossa volume, by 15% (P = 0.034) and 17% (P = 0.004), respectively. However, Caucasian Crouzon patients developed a more shortened anterior and middle cranial base, than that of Asian patients. The separation of lateral pterygoids was only significantly increased in Caucasian patients (5.49°, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Crouzon syndrome causes a shortened, widened, and kyphotic cranial base across both races. It also restricts the development of the posterior cranial fossa. However, the skull malformation is not the same between populations: Asian Crouzon patients developed more narrowed cranial base angulation on the intracranial side of basicranium, while Caucasian Crouzon patients developed more widened lateral pterygoids.

Background: The association of isolated craniosynostosis and the influence of syndromic forms confound the understanding of craniofacial morphologic development. This study attempts to clarify the individual influences of isolated bicoronal synostosis, Apert syndrome, and Crouzon syndromes on skull base morphology., Methods: One hundred seventeen computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 25; Crouzon syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; controls, n = 45). Cephalometric measurements were analyzed using Materialise software., Results: Nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients developed a shortened cranial base length, with a significantly shortened distance between nasion and sella (p = 0.005). The cranial base angles of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis in both the cranial side (N-S-BA) and facial side (N-SO-BA) increased significantly, by 17.04 degrees (p < 0.001) and 11.75 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively. However, both the N-S-BA and N-SO-BA angles of Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome were narrowed more than that of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis [by 12.11 degrees (p < 0.001) and 12.44 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively, in Apert syndrome; and by 11.66 degrees (p = 0.007) and 13.71 degrees (p = 0.007), respectively, in Crouzon syndrome]. However, there is no statistically significant difference of these two angles between Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome, when they were only associated with bicoronal synostosis. Contrary to the relatively normal subcranial space of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, both Apert and Crouzon syndromes developed a reduced subcranial space., Conclusions: Isolated bicoronal synostosis resulted in a flattened cranial base, whereas Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome developed a normal cranial base angle when only associated with bicoronal synostosis. The syndromic skulls had additional significantly reduced subcranial space.

Background: Based on an established classification system of Crouzon syndrome subtypes, detailed regional morphology and volume analysis may be useful, to clarify Crouzon cranial structure characteristics, and the interaction between suture fusion and gene regulated overall growth of the calvarium and basicranium., Methods: CT scans of 36 unoperated Crouzon syndrome patients and 56 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; type II. Sagittal synostosis; type III. Pansynostosis; type IV. Perpendicular combination synostosis., Results: Type I of Crouzon syndrome patients developed a slightly smaller posterior fossa (22%), and increased superior cranial volume (13%), which is the only subtype that develops a greater superior cranial volume. The effect of competing increased and decreased segmental volume is associated with a 24% enlargement of overall cranial volume (P = 0.321). In class III, the anterior fossa volume was increased by 31% (P = 0.007), while the volume of posterior fossa was decreased by 19% (P < 0.001). These resulted in a 7% (P = 0.046) reduction in the overall intracranial volume. Type II and type IV patients developed a trend toward anterior, middle, and posterior fossae, and entire cranial volume reduction., Conclusions: Pansynostosis is the most often form of associated craniosynostoses of Crouzon syndrome, however bilateral coronal synostosis may not dominate this form of Crouzon syndrome. The anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae may have simultaneously reduced volume if the midline suture synostosis is involved. Individualized treatment planning for Crouzon syndrome patient, theoretically should include the patient's age and temporal associated maldevelopment suture sequence.

Background: Patients with Crouzon syndrome develop various types of anatomic deformities due to different forms of craniosynostosis, yet they have similar craniofacial characteristics. However, exact homology is not evident. Different pathology then may be best treated by different forms of surgical technique. Therefore, precise classification of Crouzon syndrome, based on individual patterns of cranial suture involvement is needed., Methods: Ninety-five computed tomography (CT) scans (Crouzon, n = 33; control, n = 62) were included in this study. All the CT scans are divided into 4 types based on premature closure of sutures: class I = coronal and lambdoidal synostosis; class II = sagittal synostosis; class III = pansynostosis; and class IV = "Others." The CT scan anatomy was measured by Materialise software., Results: The class III, pansynostosis, is the most prevalent (63.6%). The classes I, III, and IV of Crouzon have significantly shortened entire anteroposterior cranial base length, with the shortest base length in class III. The external cranial measurements in class I show primarily a decreased posterior facial skeleton, while the class III presented with holistic facial skeleton reduction. Class II has the least severe craniofacial malformations, while class III had the most severe., Conclusion: The morphology of patients with Crouzon syndrome is not identical in both cranial base and facial characteristics, especially when they associated with different subtypes of cranial suture synostosis. The classification of Crouzon syndrome proposed in this study, summarizes the differences among each subgroup of craniosynostosis suture involvement, which, theoretically, may ultimately influence both the timing and type of surgical intervention.

Background: Apert syndrome causes normal or enlarged intracranial volume overall as patients grow. This study aimed to trace the segmental anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae volume and structural morphology in these patients, to help discern a more focused and individualized surgical treatment plan for patients with Apert syndrome., Methods: This study included 82 preoperative computed tomographic scans (Apert, n = 32; control, n = 50) divided into five age-related subgroups. The scans were measured using image processing and three-dimensional modeling software., Results: The middle cranial fossa volume was increased and was the earliest change noted. It was increased by 45 percent (p = 0.023) compared with controls before 6 months of age and remained increased into adulthood (161 percent, p = 0.016), with gradually increasing severity. The anterior and posterior cranial fossae volumes also increased, by 35 percent (p = 0.032) and 39 percent (p = 0.007), respectively. Increased depth of cranial fossae contributed most to the increase in volumes of patients with Apert syndrome, with correlation coefficients of 0.799, 0.908, and 0.888 for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossa, respectively. The intracranial volume was increased 12 percent (p = 0.098) across the entire test age range (0 to 26 years old), but only had statistical significance during the age range of 6 to 18 years (22 percent, p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Malformation of the middle cranial fossa is an early, perhaps the initial, pivotal cranial morphologic change in Apert syndrome. Increased cranial fossae depth is an inherent characteristic of the maldevelopment. Normalization of cranial volume and circumference overall may not achieve a normal skull structure, as it does not correct regional craniocerebral disproportion.

Background: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has gained popularity because of advantages over the subpectoral technique. Acellular dermal matrix use with implant-based breast reconstruction has become common because of its perceived superior aesthetic outcome. Matrices are expensive, however, and recent evidence has pointed to several potential complications. This article reports a series of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstructions with and without acellular dermal matrix and compared their outcomes., Methods: This is a single-surgeon retrospective review of patients who underwent staged prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy over two periods. Patients with well-perfused mastectomy skin flaps with a homogeneous thickness underwent reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix initially. On evolution of the practice, it was not used. Patient demographics, operative data, and complications were analyzed. Aesthetic outcome was measured by the BREAST-Q survey and the Aesthetic Item Scale. A cost analysis was also performed., Results: Forty patients were included (acellular dermal matrix group, n = 19; non-acellular dermal matrix group, n = 21). The nonmatrix group had one case (5 percent) of seroma and one case (5 percent) with hematoma; there were none in the acellular dermal matrix group. Average BREAST-Q and Aesthetic Item Scale scores were 82.3 versus 81.6 (p = 0.954) and 20.98 versus 20.43 (p = 0.640) for the matrix and nonmatrix groups, respectively. The direct cost savings for the authors' institution over 1 year if matrix was not used in all cases of implant-based breast reconstruction would be estimated at $3,105,960 to $6,211,920 for unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively, for Medicare reimbursement., Conclusions: With adequate patient selection, acellular dermal matrix is not always required during two-stage prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction for good aesthetic outcomes. The economic burden on patients and the health care system could be lessened with selective matrix use., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Background: External ear melanoma (EEM) is a rare condition with controversies in the literature. We analyzed patients with EEM in the United States compared to other head and neck melanomas (OHNMs)., Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to select patients with head and neck melanoma from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2015. Mann-Whitney and χ tests were used to estimate statistical significance, and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent associations adjusted for confounders., Results: A total of 137,233 patients met the study criteria. Among them, 16,991 (12.4%) had EEM and 120,242 (87.6%) had OHNM. For patients with EEM, the mean (standard deviation) age was 66.26 (15.798) years. Most of the patients with EEM were men (85.5%), insured by Medicare (52.4%), and treated in Academic/Research Programs (47.7%) or Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs (32.3%). Most of the EEM tumors had invasive behavior (68.0%) were Stages 0 (30.3%) or I (40.3%), and were without ulceration (76.9%). Mean time to receive any treatment was 14.1 days for EEM compared with 14.6 days for OHNM (P < 0.001). We noticed a greater proportion of EEM in men (14.8%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.72 [2.605-2.852]; P < 0.001) compared to women (6.22%; reference). EEM was an independent factor for tumor Stage I (14.47%; aOR 1.61 [1.101-1.224], P < 0.001) and invasive behavior (13.86%; aOR 1.268 [1.15-1.389]; P < 0.001) compared to OHNM., Conclusion: EEM was associated with higher odds of invasive behavior compared to OHNM. Furthermore, men were found to have a higher likelihood to develop EEM compared to women.

Background: Eyelid melanoma (EM) is a rare condition that accounts for <1% of all cutaneous melanomas. In this analysis, patients diagnosed with EM in the United States were compared to those with other melanomas in the head and neck., Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to select patients with head and neck melanoma from 2004 to 2015., Results: A total of 137,233 patients met the criteria of the study. Among them, 2694 were diagnosed with EM (2%) and 134,539 in other head and neck locations (98%). Regarding the patients with EM, the mean age was 68.56 years (standard deviation 14.04). A greater number of them were treated in Academic/Research Programs (53.6%), insured by Medicare (55.7%), tumor in situ (52.2%), stage 0 (49%), and without ulceration (75.9%). The mean time to treatment commencement was 18.96 days for EM compared to 14.4 days for other melanoma in the head and neck regions (P < 0.001). There was a greater proportion of EM in female patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.371 [2.191-2.566], P < 0.001), compared to male; age greater than 80 years (OR 1.622 [1.360-1.934], P < 0.001) compared to 0 to 49 years. Moreover, EM was an independent predictor for treatment in Academic/Research Programs (OR 1.258 [1.160-1.365], P < 0.001) and diagnosis at autopsy (OR 1.414 [1.083-1.847], P = 0.011) compared to other melanoma in the head and neck region., Conclusion: These novel findings have the potential to guide clinical decision making in head and neck melanoma management.

Background: Based on an established classification system of Apert syndrome subtypes, detailed regional morphology and volume analysis may be useful to provide additional clarification to individual Apert cranial structure characteristics, and treatment planning., Methods: Computed tomography scans of 32 unoperated Apert syndrome and 50 controls were included and subgrouped as: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, pansynostosis; type III, perpendicular combination synostosis. Three-dimensional analysis of craniometric points was used to define structural components using Materialise Mimics and 3-Matics software., Results: Occipitofrontal circumference of all subtypes of Apert syndrome patients is normal. Intracranial volumes of types I and II were normal, but type III was 20% greater than controls. Middle cranial fossa volume was increased in all 3 types, with the greatest increase in type II (86%). Type II developed a 69% increase in anterior cranial fossa volume, whereas type III had 39% greater posterior cranial fossa volume. Increased cranial fossa depth contributed most to above increased volume. The anteroposterior lengths of middle and posterior cranial fossae were reduced in type I (15% and 17%, respectively). However, only the anterior cranial fossa was significantly shortened in type III., Conclusions: Occipitofrontal circumference and overall intracranial volume is not always consistent in individual subunits of Apert syndrome. Detailed and segmental anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae volumes and morphology should be analyzed to see what impact this may have related to surgical planning.

Background: The morphologic effect of squamosal synostosis has not been clarified, due to its low occurrence rate, and its inclination to be combined with premature closure of other major sutures, especially in syndromic synostosis. This study's goal is to explore the morphological influence of squamosal synostosis in both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients., Methods: Twenty-five computed tomography (CT) scans from nonsyndromic squamosal synostosis (NSS), Crouzon syndrome with squamosal synostosis (CSS), Crouzon syndrome without squamosal synostosis, and normal controls were included. Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometry, entire cranial volume and cranial fossa volume were measured using Materialise software., Results: The entire cranial volume of all groups was similar. The NSS developed a gradual reduction in the severity of reduced segmental volume from the anterior cranial fossa, to the middle cranial fossa, and to the unaffected volume of posterior cranial fossa. The CSS developed the most severe volume reduction of middle cranial fossa (12608.30 ± 2408.61 mm vs 26077.96 ± 4465.74 mm, 52%), with proportionate volume reduction of the anterior (7312.21 ± 2435.97 mm vs 10520.63 ± 2400.43 mm, 30%) and posterior cranial fossa (33487.29 ± 5598.93 mm vs 48325.04 ± 14700.44 mm, 31%). The NSS developed a narrower anterior cranial fossa, a clockwise rotated Frankfort horizontal plane, and a retracted chin (pogonion)., Conclusion: Squamosal synostosis may alter the development of cranial fossa volume, especially the volume of middle cranial fossa. However, the development of cranial base, and related facial features are determined largely by major vault sutures and associated syndromic conditions, rather than the squamosal suture alone., Level of Evidence: II.

Background: Apert syndrome is frequently combined with respiratory insufficiency, because of the midfacial deformity which, in turn, is influenced by the malformation of the skull base. Respiratory impairment resulting from Apert syndrome is caused by multilevel limitations in airway space. Therefore, this study evaluated the segmented nasopharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal anatomy to clarify subcranial anatomy in children with Apert syndrome and its relevance to clinical management., Methods: Twenty-seven patients (Apert syndrome, n = 10; control, n = 17) were included. All of the computed tomographic scans were obtained from the patients preoperatively, and no patient had confounding disease comorbidity. Computed tomographic scans were analyzed using Surgicase CMF. Craniometric data relating to the midface, airway, and subcranial structures were collected. Statistical significance was determined using t test analysis., Results: Although all of the nasal measurements were consistent with those of the controls, the nasion-to-posterior nasal spine, sphenethmoid-to-posterior nasal spine, sella-to-posterior nasal spine, and basion-to-posterior nasal spine distances were decreased 20 (p < 0.001), 23 (p = 0.001), 29 (p < 0.001), and 22 percent (p < 0.001), respectively. The distance between bilateral gonions and condylions was decreased 17 (p = 0.017) and 18 percent (p = 0.004), respectively. The pharyngeal airway volume was reduced by 40 percent (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: The airway compromise seen in patients with Apert syndrome is attributable more to the pharyngeal region than to the nasal cavity, with a gradually worsening trend from the anterior to the posterior airway, resulting in a significantly reduced volume in the hypopharynx.

Complicated craniofacial malformations interfacing with multiple intracellular regulatory mechanisms, lead to ambiguous growth patterns in Apert syndrome. This study aims to explore the chronology and pathogenesis of the development of craniofacial anatomic relationships and to verify the positional correlates between skull and facial structures in Apert syndrome. Fifty-four computed tomography scans (Apert, n = 18; control, n = 36) were included and divided into 3 age subgroups. Craniofacial 3-dimensional cephalometries were analyzed by Materialize software. The angle between sella-nasion plane and maxillary plane widens 7.74° (P = 0.003) prior to 6 months of age; thereafter, this widening increases by 10.36° (P < 0.001) in 6 months to 2 years of age, and remains increased by 8.9° (P = 0.046) throughout childhood. The angle between Frankfort horizontal plane and maxillary plane widens 5.17° (P = 0.022) before 6 months. Angles SNA, SNB, and ANB showed decreases, averaging 12.23° (P < 0.001), 5.19° (P = 0.004), and 6.72° (P = 0.001), respectively. The linear measurements showed synchronicity and continuing deformity into adulthood. Between 6 months to 2 years of age, the distance from sella to nasion (S-N), anterior nasal spine (S-ANS), and posterior nasal spine (S-PNS) decreased 8% (P = 0.006), 16% (P < 0.001), and 19% (P = 0.002), respectively, and remained shortened into adulthood. The angulation changes occur earlier in development than linear distance reduction in Apert syndrome patients compared with controls. Angular adjustments were not sufficient to maintain normal cranial base length. Facial deformity of Apert syndrome temporally begins with the midface, and affects orbit and mandible later in life.

Background: Orbital dysmorphology and midface retrusion are the hallmarks of Crouzon and Apert syndromes. The precise nature of this deficiency is not known., Methods: Untreated Crouzon and Apert syndrome patients and age- and sex-matched controls were included. Computed tomographic scans were digitized and reconstructed. Craniometric and volumetric data relating to the orbit were collected., Results: Thirty-one scans were included (control, n = 12; Crouzon; n = 9; Apert, n = 10). The mean age of the Apert group was 5.31 ± 5 years; Crouzon, 5.77 ± 2.7 years; and control, 6.4 ± 3.6 years. The bony orbit length was 12 percent shorter in Apert (p = 0.004) and 17 percent shorter in the Crouzon group when compared to controls (p < 0.0001). The bony orbital volume was 21 percent smaller in the Apert children (p = 0.0006) and 23 percent smaller in Crouzon when compared to controls (p = 0.003). Globe volume was 15 percent larger in Apert (p = 0.008) and 36 percent larger in the Crouzon group when compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Orbital soft-tissue volume was 19 percent less in the Apert group (p = 0.004) and 29 percent less in the Crouzon group (p = 0.001) when compared to controls., Conclusions: A shortened bony orbit, decreased orbital and orbital soft-tissue volumes, and an increased volume of the globe were found in both conditions. Despite normal volume of the overall orbital contents, the contents are altered, and the bony orbit is shorter and holds less volume.

Background: The goal of this multicenter study was to examine 30-day outcomes following combined hysterectomy and panniculectomy compared with hysterectomy alone at a national level., Methods: Female patients who underwent hysterectomy with or without concurrent panniculectomy were identified in the 2005 through 2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data Files. Propensity scores were used to match patients who underwent combined surgery to a sample of similar patients who underwent hysterectomy alone., Results: A total of 24,893 patients who underwent hysterectomy alone and 174 patients who underwent hysterectomy with concurrent panniculectomy were identified. Patients who underwent combined surgery were more often obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), with diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular/pulmonary comorbidities. Unadjusted outcomes for the total cohort showed that patients who underwent both procedures more often experienced venous thromboembolism (2.9 percent versus 1.0 percent; p = 0.015) and length of stay greater than 3 days (48.3 percent versus 29.2 percent; p < 0.001). In the propensity-matched sample, there were no differences shown in the proportion of patients who experienced wound complications, surgical-site infections, venous thromboembolism, medical complications, or total complications. However, patients who underwent both procedures were twice as likely to experience length of stay greater than 3 days (OR, 2.06; 95 percent CI, 1.28 to 3.31)., Conclusions: Combined hysterectomy and panniculectomy procedures appear to be performed infrequently among American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-participating hospitals. After propensity matching, only differences in length of stay were identified., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Background: Airway insufficiency decreases quality of life and may be life threatening in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome. The authors calculated the three-dimensional nasal airway volume in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome to identify correlations between nasal airway volume and craniofacial morphology and provide guidance for surgical planning., Methods: Thirty nonoperated patients with Treacher Collins syndrome were compared with 35 unaffected age- and gender-matched controls. Anatomic variables of the cranial base, the maxilla complex, and internal diameters of nasal airway were compared between patients and control subjects using three-dimensional craniometric analyses. In the Treacher Collins group, the relation of craniofacial morphology to nasal airway volume was assessed separately. Statistical analyses were performed using independent sample t tests and Pearson correlation coefficient analyses., Results: Nasal airway volume was decreased 38.6 percent in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome relative to controls (p = 0.001). A positive correlation of maxillary position and nasal airway volume was shown in Treacher Collins patients (r = +0.463, p = 0.013). Maxillary, nasal bone, and orbitale width were also positively correlated with nasal airway volume (r = +0.582, p = 0.001; r = +0.408, p = 0.035; and r = +0.677, p < 0.001, respectively). Shortened internal diameters of the nasal airway all positively correlated with nasal airway volume., Conclusions: Nasal airway volume is reduced in patients with Treacher Collins syndrome. Reduced projection of the maxilla and transverse maxillary deficiency are correlated with reduced nasal airway volume and are primarily responsible for obstruction of the nasal airway., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II.

Background: The goal of this study was to compare immediate changes in breast shape and nipple position using different implant shapes and volumes, with variable release of the pectoralis major muscle in fresh cadavers., Methods: Seventeen fresh cadaveric breasts were analyzed. Six different augmentation procedures were performed, including pocket dissection in the submuscular and subglandular planes, and partial and full release of the pectoralis major muscle insertion. Round and contoured implant volumes of 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 ml were used, resulting in a total of 30 procedures per breast., Results: Projection was greater when subjects received contoured implants versus round implants in all volumes both in submuscular and in subglandular pockets (p < 0.001). For implants larger than 200 ml, projection was greater when a subglandular pocket was chosen (p < 0.02), for both round and contoured implants. Nipple-to-inframammary fold distance was increased with contoured implants compared with round implants in both subglandular and submuscular pockets for all implant volumes (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Implant shape, volume, and pocket location influence projection, causing it to increase in a linear fashion. Partial pectoralis major release seems to affect projection only for small volumes, but does not influence nipple position in the immediate setting. As projection increases with augmentation volume, cephalad movement of the nipple is produced by a relative increase in nipple-to-inframammary fold distance compared with the midclavicular point-to-nipple distance in our cadaveric sample.

Background: Children with Treacher Collins syndrome frequently present with obstructive sleep apnea and respiratory insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to three-dimensionally calculate upper airway volume in these patients. The authors also assessed the correlation between bony craniofacial morphology and spatial position with airway volume., Methods: Thirty Treacher Collins syndrome patients who have not been operated on were compared with a sample of 35 age- and sex-matched unaffected controls. Upper airway volume was stratified into retropalatal and retroglossal aspects. Three-dimensional craniometric findings were compared between patients and controls. Among Treacher Collins syndrome patients, the authors assessed the relationship of craniofacial morphology and spatial positioning to airway volume. Statistical analyses included independent sample t tests and Pearson correlation coefficient analyses., Results: Decreased total upper airway volume (p = 0.034) was found in the Treacher Collins syndrome group, attributable primarily to a decrease in retroglossal airway volume (p = 0.009). Regarding three-dimensional craniometric variables, maxillary and mandibular length (r = 0.76, p < 0.001; and r = 0.68, p < 0.001), and the anterior and posterior cranial base (r = 0.61, p < 0.001; and r = 0.77, p < 0.001) were positively correlated with airway volume in Treacher Collins syndrome patients. Transverse internal diameters of the upper airway were also positively correlated with airway volume (r = 0.635, p = 0.001; and r = 0.511, p = 0.006); however, no correlation was shown for the anteroposterior airway diameters., Conclusions: Three-dimensional analysis revealed diminished upper airway volume in Treacher Collins syndrome, with the retroglossal region being the most severely constricted. Maxillomandibular dysmorphologies, and their relationship to the cranial base, correlated significantly with airway findings.

Background: Midface retrusion is the hallmark of the syndromic dysostoses (i.e., Crouzon and Apert). Lack of forward projection and/or structural deficiency could be responsible, but neither has been adequately assessed three-dimensionally. The authors examined both the cranial base/facial interface and the midface volume to provide an understanding of the etiopathogenesis of midface deficiency., Methods: Children with computed tomographic scans in the absence of any surgical intervention were included. Demographic information was recorded for three groups: Apert, Crouzon, and control. Scans were digitized and manipulated using Materialise software (Surgicase CMF). Craniometric data relating to the midface and sphenoid were collected. Volumetric assessment of the midface was tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test., Results: Thirty-six scans were included (control, n=17; Crouzon/Apert, n=19). All children were in the early mixed dentition stage. The anterior cranial fossa proved to be shorter and wider in Crouzon/Apert patients compared with controls. The cranial base angles (N-S-BA, N-S-SO, N-SO-BA, S-SO-BA, and N-S-AR) were not statistically different across the groups. The Crouzon/Apert group showed angles more obtuse between the greater wings of the sphenoid, and more obtuse (more splayed) between the pterygoid plates. Nasion-sella-pterygomaxillary fissure angle was more obtuse (flatter) in the Crouzon/Apert group. There was no volumetric difference in the maxilla, zygoma, and sphenoid comparing the Crouzon/Apert group to controls., Conclusions: Midface retrusion in the Crouzon/Apert group is associated with altered sphenoid morphology (widened and retruded pterygoid plates), with a flatter and wider maxilla, suggesting diminished growth inferiorly and anteriorly. There is no volumetric deficiency in Crouzon/Apert patients compared with controls., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Risk, II.