Search

Objective: ICU clinicians are primarily involved in organ donation after brain death of ICU patients. Their perceptions of organ donation may affect outcomes. Our objective was to describe ICU clinician's perceptions and experience of organ donation., Design and Setting: Cross-sectional study among physicians and nurses (90 ICUs in France). We used factorial correspondence analysis to describe categories of clinicians regarding their perceptions and experience of organ donation. Factors associated with a positive (motivating) or negative (stressful) experiences were studied using multivariate logistic regression., Participants: Physicians and nurses., Measurements and Main Results: Three thousand three hundred twenty-five clinicians working in 77 ICUs returned questionnaires. Professionals who experienced organ donation as motivating were younger (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.32-0.53; p < 0.001), more often potential organ donors (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.56-2.35; p < 0.001), less likely to describe inconsistency (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.8) or complexity (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45-0.67) of their feelings versus their professional activity, less likely to report that organ donation was not a priority in their ICU (odds ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.84), and more likely to have participated in meetings of transplant coordinators with relatives (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.37-2.14; p < 0.001). Professionals who felt organ donation was stressful were older (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.34-2.54; p < 0.001), less often physicians (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.77; p < 0.001), more likely to describe shift from curative care to organ donation as emotionally complex (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.52-2.21; p < 0.001), care of relatives of brain-dead patients as complex (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.32-1.93; p < 0.001), and inconsistency and complexity of personal feelings about organ donation versus professional activity (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.92-5.53; p < 0.001), and more likely to have little experience with caring for potential organ donors (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.09-2.04)., Conclusions: Significant differences exist among ICU clinician's perceptions of organ donation. Whether these differences affect family experience and consent rates deserves investigation.

Background: Existing data suggest that increased interstitial fibrosis may occur abnormally in renal transplants from donations after uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD)., Methods: To evaluate the factors that are associated with the progression of fibrosis and its functional impact on renal grafts, we compared 76 uDCD recipients with 86 recipients of kidney donations after brain death at 1-year after transplantation. Groups were matched for donor age, rank of transplantation, and absence of human leukocyte antigen sensitization. Histology was performed on sequential biopsies in uDCD recipients. Associations between variables were analyzed using linear mixed models and univariate analyses., Results: In the uDCD group, increased fibrosis was detected 3 months after transplantation compared to before implantation. After 1 year, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score was significantly greater (1.5±0.7 vs. 1.0±0.9; P=0.003) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (49.5±17.4 vs. 60.6±19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2; P=0.0003) was significantly lower in the uDCD group than in the donations after brain death group. No flow duration and donor age were significantly associated with accelerated fibrosis. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score, interstitial inflammation score, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly worse in uDCD patients with no flow longer than 10 min., Conclusion: Donations after uncontrolled circulatory death grafts show more fibrosis after transplantation. No flow duration is associated with accelerated fibrosis and should be considered during uDCD graft allocation.

Objectives: Relatives often lack important information about intensive care unit patients. High-quality information is crucial to help relatives overcome the often considerable situational stress and to acquire the ability to participate in the decision-making process, most notably regarding the appropriate level of care. We aimed to develop a list of questions important for relatives of patients in the intensive care unit., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter study. Questions asked by relatives of intensive care unit patients were collected from five different sources (literature, panel of 28 intensive care unit nurses and physicians, 1-wk survey of nurses and 1-wk survey of physicians in 14 intensive care units, and in-depth interviews with 14 families). After a qualitative analysis (framework approach and thematic analysis), questions were rated by 22 relatives and 14 intensive care unit physicians, and the ratings were analyzed using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering., Results: The five sources produced 2,135 questions. Removal of duplicates and redundancies left 443 questions, which were distributed among nine predefined domains using a framework approach ("diagnosis," "treatment," "prognosis," "comfort," "interaction," "communication," "family," "end of life," and "postintensive care unit management"). Thematic analysis in each domain led to the identification of 46 themes, which were reworded as 46 different questions. Ratings by relatives and physicians showed that 21 of these questions were particularly important for relatives of intensive care unit patients., Conclusion: This study increases knowledge about the informational needs of relatives of intensive care unit patients. This list of questions may prove valuable for both relatives and intensive care unit physicians as a tool for improving communication in the intensive care unit.

The prognostic value of basal and corticotropin-stimulated cortisol concentration in patients with sepsis remains a controversial issue. In a retrospective cohort study, 82 consecutive patients with septic shock underwent a short corticotropin test performed more than 24 h after the onset of vasopressor therapy. Forty-one (50%) patients died within 28 days after the onset of septic shock. The mean (SD) basal cortisol level was 22.7 (10.6) microg/dL. With threshold values of 7 and 9 microg/dL maximal increases in cortisol level, 28 (34%) and 31 (38%) patients were, respectively, classified as nonresponders to the short corticotropin test. On multivariate analysis, a cortisol level >20 microg/dL (P = 0.0002), a maximal response to corticotropin <9 microg/dL (P = 0.044), abnormal lactate values (P = 0.0098), and positive blood cultures (P = 0.004) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality. In conclusion, high basal cortisol and low increase on corticotropin stimulation are predictors of a poor outcome in late septic shock. The underlying mechanisms of these prognostic patterns remain to be elucidated.

Design: Although neutropenia recovery is associated with a high risk of deterioration of respiratory condition, no studies designed to identify risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in this situation have been published., Setting: Medical ICU in a French teaching hospital., Subjects: We conducted a study to describe critically ill cancer patients with ARDS during neutropenia recovery (defined as the 7-day period centered on the day the neutrophil count rose above 1000/mm3 [day 0]) and to compare them with critically ill cancer patients without ARDS during neutropenia recovery., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: During a 10-yr period, 62 critically ill cancer patients recovered from neutropenia, of whom 21 experienced ARDS during neutropenia recovery, with a median time of -1 days (-2.5-1) between day 0 and ARDS. In-ICU mortality in these 21 patients was 61.9%. As compared with non-ARDS patients, ARDS patients were less likely to have myeloma and more likely to have leukemia/lymphoma treated with adriamycin, a history of pneumonia before neutropenia, and a neutropenia duration >10 days; they had a shorter time since malignancy diagnosis and a longer time from chemotherapy to neutropenia. Neither the leukocyte counts on day 0 nor those during the 6-day neutropenia recovery period were predictive of ARDS., Conclusions: Patients with acute respiratory failure after prolonged neutropenia complicated by pneumonia are at increased risk for ARDS.