Search

Background: An aging population and improved cancer survivorship have increased the number of individuals with treated malignancy who develop advanced heart failure. The benefits of heart transplantation (HT) in patients with a pretransplant malignancy (PTM) must be balanced against risks of posttransplant malignancy in the setting of immunosuppression., Methods: Adult patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry who received HT between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020 were included. Trends, patient characteristics, and posttransplant outcomes in HT recipients with PTM were evaluated., Results: From 2000 to 2020, the proportion of HT recipients with PTM increased from 3.2% to 8.2%. From 2010 to 2020, 2113 (7.7%) of 27 344 HT recipients had PTM. PTM was associated with higher rates of 1-year mortality after HT (11.9% versus 9.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.09-1.44], P =0.001), driven by increased mortality in patients with hematologic PTM (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.61-2.48]; P <0.001). For recipients who survived the first year, 5-year survival was similar between patients with and without PTM. Rates of malignancy at 5-years posttransplant were higher in the PTM group (20.4% versus 13.1%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.38-1.79], P <0.001)., Conclusions: Prevalence of PTM in HT recipients nearly tripled over the past 2 decades. Patients with hematologic PTM were at increased risk of early mortality after HT. Patients with PTM were also at higher risk for posttransplant malignancy. Guidelines that reflect contemporary oncological care are needed to inform care of this heterogenous and expanding group of individuals.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are associated with the development of antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, which can create a challenge for future transplantation in these patients. The differential effects of Heartmate 3 (HM3) versus Heartmate II (HMII) on de novo HLA allosensitization remain unknown. Patients who underwent HMII or HM3 implantation and had no prior HLA antibodies by solid-phase assay (Luminex) testing were included in this study. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels and Luminex antibody profiles were followed until cardiac transplantation, device explantation, or death. Electronic medical records were reviewed to examine posttransplant outcomes. Thirty-eight HM3 and 34 HMII patients with complete data were followed for 1.5 ± 1.1 years on device support. HM3 and HMII groups had similar age at implant, female gender, ischemic heart failure etiology, bridge strategy at implant, as well as intraoperative and postoperative transfusion requirements. 39.5% of HM3 and 47.1% of HMII patients developed detectable HLA antibodies by Luminex testing (p = 0.516). Development of high-level (mean fluorescence intensity >10,000) antibodies was significantly lower in HM3 than HMII patients (5.3 vs. 20.6%, p = 0.049). CDC PRA testing showed fewer HM3 patients with a positive result (PRA > 0%) than HMII patients (39.4 vs. 70.0%, p = 0.015). Among transplanted patients, those who had developed de novo sensitization on LVAD support showed a trend toward incidence of moderate to severe grade rejection compared with unsensitized patients (23.8 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.078). HM3 is associated with lower risk of de novo HLA sensitization compared with HMII., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

CRP is an established inflammatory biomarker with prognostic value in patients with chronic heart failure, yet its role in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients is largely unknown. 5,183 patients from the INTERMACS registry who underwent durable LVAD between 2008 and 2017 and had preimplant CRP levels were included. The sample was stratified into two groups based on preimplant CRP levels: CRP of 0-10 mg/L (low) and >10 mg/L (high). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess outcomes at 2 years after LVAD implantation, with log-rank testing used to compare groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariable adjustment. Patients with high preimplant CRP were younger, more likely to be INTERMACS class I, and had a higher need for temporary mechanical circulatory support before LVAD implant compared to those with lower CRP levels (all P < 0.001). The high CRP group had higher WBC counts and BNP levels (all P < 0.001). After adjustment, higher CRP (>10 mg/L) was associated with greater risk of mortality, RV failure, and stroke postimplant (P < 0.001). In addition, elevated postimplant CRP level at 3 months was associated with increased mortality and stroke on LVAD support (P < 0.001). CRP is a predictor of death and complications on LVAD support. Future studies are necessary to explore the mechanisms underlying this finding and the potential role of antiinflammatory therapies in this population., Competing Interests: Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

Background: One of the goals of the revised 6-tiered US adult heart allocation policy was to improve risk stratification of patients to lower exception status utilization for transplant listing. We sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of waitlisted patients using exception status and to examine region- and center-level differences in utilization of exception status in the new heart allocation system., Methods: This retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database included adult waitlisted patients for heart transplant between October 18, 2018, and June 30, 2020, in the United States, stratified by use of exception status versus standard criteria., Results: Out of 6351 patients, 1907 (30.0%) were waitlisted under exception status. Patients using exception status were more likely to have a nonischemic cause of heart failure, blood type O, United Network for Organ Sharing status 2 at listing and were less likely to have a durable left ventricular assist device at listing. Exception status utilization varied significantly between and within United Network for Organ Sharing regions. Listing by exception criteria was associated with a significantly higher incidence of heart transplantation compared with listing by standard criteria (hazard ratio, 1.25 [1.15-1.38], P <0.001), without increased risk of death or delisting for worsening clinical status (hazard ratio, 0.83 [0.65-1.05], P =0.12) after multivariable adjustment., Conclusions: The status tiers of the new heart allocation system may not fully capture medical urgency and complexity of waitlisted patients as assessed by transplant physicians and review committees and may limit the ability to develop a heart allocation score.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a component of an often multiorgan granulomatous disease of still uncertain cause. It is being recognized with increasing frequency, mainly as the result of heightened awareness and new diagnostic tests, specifically cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. The purpose of this case-based review is to highlight the potentially life-saving importance of making the early diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis using these new tools and to provide a framework for the optimal care of patients with this disease. We will review disease mechanisms as currently understood, associated arrhythmias including conduction abnormalities, and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, guideline-directed diagnostic criteria, screening of patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, and the use of pacemakers and defibrillators in this setting. Treatment options, including those related to heart failure, and those which may help clarify disease mechanisms are included.

Background: Advanced heart failure therapies such as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation require intricate follow-up and complex care. We sought to explore the burden of psychosocial risk factors among patients with LVAD and their impact on postimplant outcomes using the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support., Methods: Adult patients in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support requiring durable LVAD between 2008 and 2017 were included. Individuals were determined to have psychosocial risk if they had one of the following: (1) limited social support; (2) limited cognition; (3) substance abuse (alcohol and drug); (4) severe psychiatric disease (including major depression and other major psychiatric diagnosis); and (5) repeated noncompliance. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze predictors of survival and complications., Results: A total of 15 403 continuous-flow LVAD recipients were included. A total of 3163 (20.5%) had one or more psychosocial risk factors. The most prevalent psychosocial risk factor was substance abuse in 1941 (12.6%) recipients. Patients with psychosocial risk factors were significantly younger at LVAD implant, less likely to be White, and less likely to be female compared with those without psychosocial risk, P <0.001 for all. Patients with psychosocial risk were significantly more likely to receive an LVAD as destination therapy, P <0.001. In adjusted models, patients with psychosocial risk were at increased hazards for device-related infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, pump thrombosis, and readmission and reduced hazards for cardiac transplantation ( P <0.05 for all). There was no statistically significant difference in survival on pump support or stroke., Conclusions: Psychosocial risk is an important component of patient selection for advanced heart failure therapies. Addressing these specific components may help improve access to advanced therapies and post-LVAD outcomes.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed severe restrictions on traditional methods of patient care. During the pandemic, the heart failure program at New York-Presbyterian Hospital in New York, NY rapidly and comprehensively transitioned its care delivery model and administrative organization to conform to a new healthcare environment while still providing high-quality care to a large cohort of patients with heart failure, heart transplantation, and left ventricular assist device. In addition to the widespread adoption of telehealth, our program restructured outpatient care, initiating a shared clinic model and introducing a comprehensive remote monitoring program to manage patients with heart failure and heart transplant. All conferences, including administrative meetings, support groups, and educational seminars were converted to teleconferencing platforms. Following the peak of COVID-19, many of the new changes have been maintained, and the program structure will be permanently altered as a lasting effect of this pandemic. In this article, we review the details of our program's transition in the face of COVID-19 and highlight the programmatic changes that will endure.

Background: Pregnancy after heart transplantation (HT) is a concern for many female recipients. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation has guidelines regarding reproductive health, but limited data exist regarding providers' attitudes and practices surrounding pregnancy post-HT., Methods: We conducted an independent, confidential, voluntary, web-based survey sent electronically to 1643 United States heart transplant providers between June and August 2019., Results: There were 122 responses, the majority from cardiologists (n=85, 70%) and nurse or transplant coordinators (n=22, 18%). Thirty-one percent (n=37) of respondents indicated that pregnancy should be avoided in all HT recipients, and only 43% (n=52) reported that their center had a formal policy regarding pregnancy following HT. The most commonly reported contraindications included nonadherence (n=109, 89%), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=104, 85%), coronary allograft vasculopathy (n=86, 70%), prior rejection (n=76, 62%), presence of donor-specific antibodies (n=69, 57%), and prior peripartum cardiomyopathy pretransplant (n=57, 47%). Respondent sex, specialty, transplant volume, or prior experience with pregnancy after HT were not associated with recommendations to avoid posttransplant pregnancy., Conclusions: Transplant providers' attitudes regarding posttransplant pregnancy vary widely. Despite International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines, a significant proportion indicates that pregnancy is contraindicated in all recipients and the majority of programs have no center-specific policy to manage such pregnancies. While the low response rate limits the generalizability of the findings, they do suggest that education on the feasibility of pregnancy post-HT is indicated as many recipients are of, or survive to, childbearing age.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are increasingly used in advanced heart failure patients. Recent studies suggest that low socioeconomic status (SES) predicts worst survival after heart transplantation. Both individual-level and neighborhood-level SES (nSES) have been linked to cardiovascular health; however, the impact of SES in CF-LVAD patients remains unknown. We hypothesized that SES is a major determinant of CF-LVAD candidacy and postimplantation outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 362 patients between February 2009 and May 2016. Neighborhood-level SES was measured using the American Community Survey data and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index score. Individual-level SES was self reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression determined survival statistics. Patients in the highest SES tertile were older (58 ± 13 vs. 53 ± 14; p < 0.001), less likely to be black or Hispanic (26% vs. 70%; p < 0.001), more likely to be married (87% vs. 65%; p < 0.001), more likely to have private insurance (50% vs. 39%; p < 0.001), and more likely to have employment (29% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) compared with patients in the lowest tertile. Low nSES was associated with a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.580; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.347-0.970; p = 0.038) in comparison to the high nSES. However, after adjusting for baseline clinical morbidities, the relationship was no longer present. When selecting patients for a LVAD, SES should not be thought of as an immutable risk factor. Carefully selected low-SES patients could be safely implanted with CF-LVAD with outcomes comparable to high-SES patients.

For patients bridged to transplant (BTT) with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), data regarding the use of induction immunosuppressive therapy remain limited. The objectives of the current study were to describe the current trends and clinical consequences of IT in patients BTT with LVAD. The United Network of Organ Sharing database was queried to identify adult, single-organ heart transplant recipients who were BTT with LVAD between 2008 and 2018. Propensity score matching was then used to balance clinical covariates between those patient who did and did not receive IT. The primary outcomes of interest were graft survival, hospitalization for rejection and infection, and freedom from transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD). In the overall cohort, 49.1% (n = 3,978) received IT, with basiliximab being the most commonly used agent followed by antithymocyte globulin. After propensity score matching, 4,388 patients (2,194 without induction and 2,194 with induction) were identified. Between those who did and did not receive IT, there was no significant difference in graft survival, freedom from hospitalization for rejection, and freedom from hospitalization for infection. Patients who received IT experienced increased freedom from TCAD (p = 0.004) with unadjusted hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% Cardiac Index: 0.70-0.93). For freedom from TCAD, antithymocyte globulin was associated with better outcomes than basiliximab (80.2% vs. 73.1% at 5 years, log rank p value = 0.004). In a sensitivity analysis, there was no significant increase in hospitalization for infection in those patients with an infected LVAD before transplant. Use of induction therapy in patients BTT with LVAD appears to be safe and feasible, without a significant increase in the risk of infection or rejection, even in those patients with pretransplant device-related infections. IT, particularly antithymocyte globulin, was associated with increased time to development of TCAD. Routine use of IT in patients BTT with LVAD may be considered, and further randomized control trials are warranted to further support these data.

Prophylactic DeVega tricuspid annuloplasty (DVA) of the donor heart has been reported to improve tricuspid regurgitation (TR), renal dysfunction, and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients. This is the first study to investigate the electrical, as well as, hemodynamic effects of DVA during orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic data of 76 patients with DVA and 104 patients without DVA who underwent OHT between 2013 and 2017 at Columbia University Medical Center (New York, NY) were studied. Patients with DVA were older (56.5 ± 1.2 vs. 52.4 ± 1.0 years of age; p = 0.017) and predominantly men (78% vs. 68%; p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in right ventricular function and TR. Patients with DVA had increased incidence of right bundle branch block compared with without DVA (37% ± 5.9% vs. 9% ± 2.9%; p < 0.001). Three patients with DVA developed complete heart block (CHB), whereas no patients without DVA developed CHB (p = 0.04). Four patients with DVA received a pacemaker (PPM), whereas only one patient in the without DVA group received a PPM. Complete heart block was significantly increased in patients who received prophylactic DVA. Possible risk of conduction abnormalities should be considered with performance of DVA annuloplasty in cardiac transplant recipients.

Background: Bridge to transplantation (BTT) with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is a mainstay of therapy for heart failure in patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). Criteria for HT listing do not differ between patients medically managed and those mechanically bridged to HT. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the impact of BTT with LVAD on posttransplantation survival, to describe differences in causes of 1-year mortality in medically and mechanically bridged patients, and to evaluate differences in risk factors for 1-year mortality between those with and those without LVAD at the time of HT., Methods: Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we identified 5486 adult, single-organ HT recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2015. Patients were propensity matched for likelihood of LVAD at the time of HT. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess the impact of BTT on 1- and 5-year mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the odds ratio of 1-year mortality for patients BTT with LVAD compared with those with medical management across clinically significant variables at various thresholds., Results: Early mortality was higher in mechanically bridged patients: 9.5% versus 7.2% mortality at 1 year (P<0.001). BTT patients incurred an increased risk of 1-year mortality with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 40 to 60 mL·min -1 ·1.73 m -2 (odds ratio, 1.69; P=0.003) and <40 mL·min -1 ·1.73 m -2 (odds ratio, 2.16; P=0.005). A similar trend was seen in patients with a body mass index of 25 to 30 kg/m 2 (odds ratio, 1.88; P=0.024) and >30 kg/m 2 (odds ratio, 2.11; P<0.001). When patients were stratified by BTT status and the presence of risk factors, including age >60 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL·min -1 ·1.73 m -2 , and body mass index >30 kg/m 2 , there were significant differences in 1-year mortality between medium- and high-risk medically and mechanically bridged patients, with 1-year mortality in high-risk BTT patients at 17.6% compared with 10.4% in high-risk medically managed patients., Conclusions: Bridge to HT with LVAD, although necessary because of organ scarcity and capable of improving wait list survival, confers a significantly higher risk of early posttransplantation mortality. Patients bridged with mechanical support may require more careful consideration for transplant eligibility after LVAD placement.

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have become a standard treatment choice in advanced heart failure patients. We hypothesized that practice patterns with regards to CF-LVAD utilization vary significantly among transplant centers and impact waitlist outcomes., Methods and Results: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult patients who were waitlisted for heart transplantation (HT) between 2008 and 2015. Each patient was assigned a propensity score based on likelihood of receiving a durable CF-LVAD before or while waitlisted. The primary outcomes of interest were death or delisting for worsening status and HT at 1 year. A total of 22 863 patients from 92 centers were identified. Among these, 9013 (39.4%) were mechanically supported. CF-LVAD utilization varied significantly between and within United Network for Organ Sharing regions. Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was significantly lower in propensity-score-matched patients who were mechanically supported versus medically managed (83.5% versus 79.2%; P <0.001). However, cumulative incidence of HT was also lower in mechanically supported patients (53.3% versus 63.6%; P <0.001). Congruous mechanical and medical bridging strategies based on clinical risk profile were associated with lower risk of death or delisting (hazard ratio, 0.88; P =0.027) and higher likelihood of HT (hazard ratio, 1.14; P <0.001)., Conclusions: CF-LVAD utilization may lower waitlist mortality at the expense of lower likelihood of HT. Decision to use CF-LVAD and timing of transition should be individualized based on patient-, center-, and region-level risk factors to achieve optimal outcomes., (© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) generally are considered poor candidates for mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) and often not able to be bridged mechanically to heart transplantation. This study characterized MCSD utilization and transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with RCM/HCM under the current allocation system and discusses changes in the era of the new donor allocation system., Methods and Results: Patients waitlisted from 2006 to 2016 in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry were stratified by RCM/HCM versus other diagnoses. MCSD utilization and waitlist duration were analyzed by propensity score models. Waitlist outcomes were assessed by cumulative incidence functions with competing events. Predictors of waitlist mortality or delisting for worsening status in patients with RCM/HCM were identified by proportional hazards model. Of 30 608 patients on the waitlist, 5.1% had RCM/HCM. Patients with RCM/HCM had 31 fewer waitlist days ( P <0.01) and were ≈26% less likely to receive MCSD ( P <0.01). Cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality was similar between cohorts; however, patients with RCM/HCM had higher incidence of heart transplantation. Predictors of waitlist mortality or delisting for worsening status in patients with RCM/HCM without MCSD support included estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >20 mm Hg, inotrope use, and subjective frailty., Conclusions: Patients with RCM/HCM are less likely to receive MCSD but have similar waitlist mortality and slightly higher incidence of transplantation compared with other patients. The United Network for Organ Sharing RCM/HCM risk model can help identify patients who are at high risk for clinical deterioration and in need of expedited heart transplantation., (© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: There is mixed evidence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in heart transplant outcomes. Their underlying cause-and whether individual- or community-level traits are most influential-remains unclear. The current study aimed to characterize socioeconomic disparities in outcomes and identify time trends and mediators of these disparities., Methods and Results: We used United Network for Organ Sharing registry data and included 33 893 adult heart transplant recipients between 1994 and 2014. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators included insurance, education, and neighborhood SES measured using a composite index. Black race and multiple indicators of low SES were associated with the primary outcome of death or retransplant, independent of baseline clinical characteristics. Blacks had lower HLA and race matching, but further adjustment for these and other graft characteristics only slightly attenuated the association with black race (HR, 1.25 after adjustment). This and the associations with neighborhood SES (HR, 1.19 for lowest versus highest decile), Medicare (HR, 1.17), Medicaid (HR, 1.29), and college education (HR, 0.90) remained significant after full adjustment. When comparing early (1994-2000) and late (2001-2014) cohorts, the disparities associated with the middle (second and third) quartiles significantly decreased over time, but those associated with lowest SES quartile and black race persisted. Low neighborhood SES was also associated with higher risks of noncompliance (HR, 1.76), rejection (HR, 1.28), hospitalization (HR, 1.13), and infection (HR, 1.10)., Conclusions: Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in heart transplant outcomes, but the latter may be narrowing over time. These disparities are not explained by differences in clinical or graft characteristics., (© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.)