Search

Since the introduction of antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (moAbs), the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has become crucially dependent on the mutation profile of the tumour over the last two decades. Recently, rechallenge strategy with cetuximab-based chemotherapy has demonstrated to be active in a subgroup of patients whose tumour maintained wild-type RAS and RAF status. In this setting, liquid biopsy may replace tissue sample for the identification of specific subgroups of pretreated patients that may benefit from the reintroduction of anti-EGFR moAbs. In November 2014, a 64-year-old man with IVB stage BRAF, KRAS and NRAS wild-type mCRC was admitted in our hospital. He received FOLFIRI cetuximab as first-line treatment with deep and long-lasting partial response (PR), followed by cetuximab maintenance therapy until January 2016. At the time of disease progression, FOLFIRI cetuximab regimen was reintroduced resulting in stabilization of disease and he continued with capecitabine cetuximab therapy until disease progression in October 2016. Then, the patient consecutively received FOLFOX bevacizumab, TAS-102, regorafenib and FOLFIRI followed by de Gramont maintenance treatment. Finally, he was retreated with FOLFIRI cetuximab with disease progression within 3 months and died in May 2019. During his clinical course, liquid biopsy detected two mutations: one in KRAS Cd.12 and one in NRAS Cd. 61. The longitudinal assessment of RAS status offers considerable advantages in order to avoid side effects and economic costs for ineffective treatment choices. Liquid biopsy could help better monitor the disease and provide molecularly guided treatments.

Objectives: Two issues were put forth by clinicians in the management of the advanced stages of rare variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and other exocrine histotypes with peculiar clinical and pathological features: Do chemotherapy regimens recommended in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients have a clinical activity in rare pancreatic tumors? Or should other chemotherapy combinations be considered in this subset of patients?, Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study that collected data from 2005 to 2016 at 14 Italian cancer centers with the aim to evaluate tumor response and time to progression for first- and second-line and overall survival., Results: Of approximately 4300 exocrine pancreatic cancer patients, 79 advanced cases affected by rare histological types were identified, with pancreatic acinar cell cancer (n = 23), pancreatic adenosquamous cancer (n = 16), and mucinous cystic neoplasm with an associated invasive mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (n = 15) most represented. Survival analyses for each subgroup in relation with the different chemotherapy regimens showed the lack of statistical significance correlations., Conclusions: Because of the lack of clinical trials in patients affected by these rare pancreatic histotypes, only their molecular classification would help clinicians in future therapeutic choice.

Survival from breast cancer (BC) is influenced by the timeliness of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment, and may constitute a measure of the global effectiveness of a healthcare system. As the healthcare systems of several European Latin countries have some similarities, the search for differences in cancer survival may provide interesting information on the efficacy of these systems. The SUDCAN study is a collaboration between the Group for Epidemiology and Cancer Registration in Latin language countries (GRELL) and EUROCARE. BC data from six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland) were extracted from the EUROCARE-5 database. First, we focus on 1- and 5-year age-standardized net survival (NS) from BC by country over the 2000-2004 period. Then, trends in NS over the 1989-2004 period and changes in the pattern of cancer excess mortality rate (EMR) up to 5 years after diagnosis were examined using a multivariate EMR model. There were little differences in age-standardized NS from BC. Over the 2000-2004 period, the 5-year survival ranged between 82 (Spain, Belgium, and Portugal) and 86% (France). There was an increase in age-standardized survival between 1989 and 2004 at 1 year as well as at 5 years. This increase was observed at all ages and in all countries. There was a decrease in the cancer EMR both immediately after diagnosis and by the second and third year of follow-up. There were only minor differences in survival from BC between European Latin countries. The general improvement in NS is presumably because of advances in early cancer diagnosis and improvements in treatment.

Objective: A survey of breakthrough pain (BTP) was performed in five palliative care units (PCU), seven oncology departments (ONC), and nine pain clinics (OPC)., Methods: A standard algorithm was used to confirm the diagnosis of BTP of patients refereed to different settings., Results: 1,412 evaluable cancer patients were enrolled. 53.9% were males and the mean age was 63.7±13.1 years. The mean intensity of background pain was 2.8±0.73. Patients reported 2.4±1.1 BTP episodes/day with a mean intensity of 7.37±1.28. 80.6% patients reported that the BTP had a significant negative impact in everyday life. The majority of patients reported a fast onset of BTP, which was predictable in 50.7% of cases, while BTP with a gradual onset (>10 min) was less predictable (29%) (P=0.001). PCU patients were older, had lower Karnofsky levels, a lower number of BTP episodes/day, a slow onset of BTP onset, and a less predictable BTP. Cancer diagnosis was performed a mean of 23.5 months (SD±32.8) before the assessment. The mean duration of background pain was 3.5 months (SD±3.5), and the mean duration of any analgesic treatment was 2.5 months (SD±3). BTP started a mean of 2.2 months (SD±1.9) before the assessment. Characteristics of BTP were influenced by the course of disease, as well as the duration of background pain and initiation of BTP. Most patients took rapid onset opioids and were satisfied with the treatment. BTP diagnosis was prevalently made by ONC and OPC physicians, and rarely by GPs., Conclusion: This survey performed by an Italian observatory expert review group, has confirmed that the BTP represents a clinically relevant condition with a negative impact on the patient's quality of life. BTP was detected in all settings involved. A number of factors are associated with the BTP. Also factors regarding the course of disease and setting of care have been assessed. This information may help in stratifying patients or predicting the risk of development of BTP with specific characteristics.

The objective of this trial was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil by leucovorin, methotrexate, and platinum in patients with advanced measurable disease. Thirty-five patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with methotrexate (100 mg/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in a 2-hour infusion, day 1), 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day, i.v. in continuous infusion from days 2 to 5) plus 1-leucovorin (7.5 mg/m2 given per os every 6 hours, from days 2 to 5) and platinum (60 mg/m2 i.v., day 2), every 28 days. Four partial responses (12%; exact 95% confidence interval: 1-23%) were obtained in 34 evaluable patients with a median survival time of 49 weeks (range, 20-77 weeks). Ten (29%) of 34 patients had stable disease. Median time to treatment failure from the beginning of therapy was 11 weeks (range, 4-59 weeks) and median survival time was 20 weeks (range, 4-77 weeks). The most common grade III-IV toxicities were diarrhea (15%), stomatitis (41%), and vomiting (17%). Hematologic toxicity was mild. There were no therapy-related deaths. In conclusion, this trial did not report an increase or improvement in response rate and survival rates, and this regimen cannot be recommended as effective therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research tested two experimental chemotherapy strategies in an attempt to improve the results achievable with conventional chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. One hundred sixty-two patients were randomly allocated as follows: (a) to the conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimen (CMF); (b) to a rotational crossing program (ROT-CROSS); or (c) to a sequential intensification program (SEQ-INT). The same single agents (C, M, F, cisplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin) were administered in both experimental arms, but following a different policy. The SEQ-INT program induced a significantly higher complete response (32% vs. 6%, p = 0.0006) and objective response rate (72% vs. 42%, p = 0.0047) than CMF did. There were no differences in survival between CMF and either experimental arm. A number of side effects were significantly more with both experimental chemotherapies than with CMF, but the treatments were generally tolerable. Although some caution is required when interpreting a significant advantage found between an entire chemotherapeutic strategy and a single conventional combination, this study documents the potential therapeutic advantage of administering different sequential chemotherapies, and changing each at the time of maximum result without waiting for a progression. The impressive cytoreductive effects achievable with this policy (SEQ-INT) in metastatic disease merit further investigation in the adjuvant setting.

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer were randomized to receive folinic acid (FA; 500 mg/mq in 2-hour intravenous infusion) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU; 600 mg/mq given as an intravenous bolus 1 hour after FA), beginning every week for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, either without hydroxyurea (HU, arm A) or with HU (35 mg/kg per day) given orally in three administrations (every 8 hours) starting 6 hours after 5FU administration (arm B). Six weekly doses were considered one course. One hundred eighty-two patients were randomized in this trial and 162 (89%) were evaluable for response: 81 patients in arm A and 81 patients in arm B. Objective response was observed in 18 (one complete response and 17 partial responses) of 81 evaluable patients (22%; 95% confidence interval, 13-31%) in arm A, and 24 (nine complete responses and 15 partial responses) of 81 patients (30%; 95% confidence interval, 20-40%) in arm B. There was no difference in terms of median time to progression and median survival. Gastrointestinal toxicity was the most frequently observed toxicity in both arms. The double modulation of 5FU, FA plus HU does not appear to be better than the classic 5FU plus FA schedule. This trial confirms that 5FU and FA reached a plateau of 20% to 30%.

The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC) randomized 55 naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) between intravenous fluorouracil (5FU) 400 mg/m2, days 1-5 and folinic acid (FA) 200 mg/m2, days 1-5 alone, using Machover's schedule, or with FU, FA, and ifosfamide (IFO) 5 g/m2, day 1 and Mesna. In both arms, treatment was repeated every 28 days. Fifty-one patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 6% (3 out of 51), 1 out of 29 (3%) complete response (CR) in the arm with FU plus FA, and 2 out of 22 (9%) partial responses (PR) in the arm with IFO. The duration of response rate was 39, 55, and 74 weeks, respectively. Median survival time was 21 weeks (range, 4-83 weeks) for 5FU/FA and 16 weeks (range, 3-106 weeks) for the FU/FA/IFO arm. Diarrhea, mucositis, and vomiting occurred in the majority of patients. One patient died due to toxicity. The combination of 5FU plus FA failed to demonstrate therapeutic activity in patients with APC and was associated with moderate to severe toxicity that could lower the quality of life of these patients. Ifosfamide did not potentiate the activity of this combination. Neither of these combinations should be considered for treatment of patients with APC.

Thirty-three evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer (12 previously treated with adjuvant chemotherapy) were treated with a combination of cis-platin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (CAP). cis-Platin was given intravenously, 20 mg/m2, on days 1-3, doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 i.v., on day 1, and cyclophosphamide, 200 mg/m2 i.v., on days 1-3. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A complete response (CR) was obtained in 3 patients (9%) and a partial response (PR) in 18 (54%). The highest response rate was observed in soft tissue and in liver metastases. Median response duration was 48 weeks and median survival 93 weeks. Toxicity was moderate and consisted of alopecia (100%), gastrointestinal toxicity (86%), and myelosuppression (60%). We conclude that this regimen is active in the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma, with a generally acceptable tolerance, but further evaluations in Phase III studies are required.