Search

Background: Although research has demonstrated positive impacts of family-centered care (FCC), many neonatal inten- sive care unit (NICU) nurses hesitate to fully engage in its practice. There has been little scientific focus on investigating the challenges of FCC implementation in the NICU setting. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to generate a grounded theory explaining the process by which neonatal nurses experience facilitators and challenges through engaging in FCC practices in the context of the NICU setting. Methods: This qualitative, grounded theory portion of a mixed-methods study employed individual, semistructured, video-based dyadic interviews with 20 neonatal nurses. Results: Successful implementation of FCC by neonatal nurses is affected by various factors. The adage that “it takes a village to raise a child” described this process for the nurse participants. The delivery of FCC involves respectful engage- ment and participation by multiple internal and external stakeholders. The process of delivering FCC was influenced by factors across 6 categories: equitable relationships, bond of trust, knowledge sharing, empowerment in workplace, environment and culture, and regulations. The findings suggest that FCC implementation is not an individual initiative; rather, it involves a complex set of interrelationships between care team members. NICU nurses may consider these findings when they are proposing a change to a FCC model. Implications for Practice and Research: Flexibility is necessary by multidisciplinary teams to achieve maximum benefits of FCC and minimize potential harm, despite the unit design. Facilities may support nurses with continuing education programs to expand their FCC knowledge and skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adults born preterm (birth <37 weeks' gestation) have a two-fold increased risk of early cardiovascular mortality. With 10% of the U.S. population born prematurely and perinatal advancements dramatically improving survival rates, millions of survivors are now reaching adulthood. This phenomenon has introduced a whole new population of individuals with a history of preterm birth. Although the prevailing notion has been that preterm birth is a condition confined only to infancy and early childhood, we now know preterm birth is a risk for lifelong chronic health conditions. Despite almost a decade of epidemiological evidence showing increased cardiovascular risk for those born preterm, this has not yet been translated into clinical practice. As a result, clinicians are caring for adults born prematurely without screening and treatment guidelines for this at-risk population and few inquire about birth history during clinical encounters. This brief report presents growing evidence about disrupted cardiogenesis and consequential structural and functional modifications. By asking the question "Were you born preterm?," nurse practitioners can take the first step of increasing their awareness of this at-risk population and mitigate adverse cardiovascular outcomes by using preterm birth as a risk factor when determining health promotion and treatment decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Among the most intense adversity experiences for infants is premature birth. Early birth marks the beginning of a life course that broadly affects families, healthcare, education, social systems, and the survivors themselves. For many, the transition to adulthood is challenging and often hampered by cognitive, physical and mental health, and motor and independence difficulties. Objectives: The aim of this study was to share a comprehensive protocol of a 10th follow-up study of premature infants in their 30s. The protocol accounts for stress during the neonatal period, the cumulative context (risk and protection) of development, biological and epigenetic mechanisms, and individual resilience. Methods: The prospective, five-group longitudinal design includes 215 term-born and preterm-born individuals with various neonatal morbidities at ages 30–35 years. Adult outcomes include health, adaptive, executive function, work, and social competence. Novel measures are four system indicators of allostatic load (AL) and epigenetics. Contextual measures include socioeconomic risk and individual resilience. All measures were selected based on coherence with constructs of the scientific aims, strong psychometrics, continuity for repeated measures, and minimal subject burden. Objective assessments include body composition imaging, exercise testing, blood and saliva collection, and actigraphy. The two-phase protocol takes approximately 8 hours. Discussion: After an 11-month COVID-19 pause, participant response has been strong. As of May 2022, 75 participants have completed the full protocol, and 99 have consented to participate. When socioeconomic risk is controlled, we hypothesize that life course trajectories in physical and psychological health, adaptive function, and executive function will differ between term and preterm neonatal morbidity groups. AL will vary across groups and contribute to outcomes. We expect proximal protection and resilience to mediate the cumulative medical and socioeconomic risk and AL. Epigenome-wide DNA methylation, with estimates of age acceleration, will be examined across groups and explored in longitudinal associations with medical risk, socioeconomic status, and protection. To our knowledge, this is the only U.S. study of premature infants aged 30–35 years. With millions of preterm-born individuals reaching adulthood, the protocol incorporates molecular and genetic biomarkers in a life course developmental examination to inform the timing and content of interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Approximately 7 out of every 100 births in the United States result in admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), which contributes to a delay in initial physical contact between the parents and their newborn. While family-centered care (FCC) increases opportunities for parent-infant connection, implementation barriers persist in clinical practice. Research has yet to examine whether organizational and nursing factors of empowerment and compassion fatigue (CF) in the NICU are associated with FCC practice.Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between empowerment, CF, and FCC practices among NICU nurses.Methods: This quantitative portion of a mixed-methods study used a cross-sectional, descriptive correlational design. Bedside NICU nurses with at least 6-month experience were recruited to complete an anonymous online survey using established, valid, and reliable instruments.Results: Except for organizations with Magnet status, there were no significant differences in FCC practice within individual and institutional characteristics. Hierarchical linear regression model indicated nurse empowerment was a strong predictor of FCC practice (β= 0.31, R2 = 0.35, P < .001). There was only a weak, inverse association between CF and FCC practices ( r =-0.199, P < .001).Implication For Research and Practice: Further qualitative research will integrate these findings to understand the process by which neonatal nurses engage in FCC practices in the context of NICU setting. Future studies should examine facilitators and barriers of FCC practice in the NICU. Strategies (eg, policies and trainings) to increase nurse empowerment and support for FCC implementation should be developed and evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trauma is an innately subjective experience ensuing from a deeply distressing event. Research has demonstrated that while the environment of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is capable of providing extraordinary lifesaving measures following birth, the experience may be disruptive to several key aspects of early development, placing infants at risk for adverse behavioral, cognitive, and emotional outcomes.Purpose: This article provides rationale for the concept of Infant Medical Trauma in the NICU (IMTN) as a means of describing this unique stress experience. A triad of cumulative early life NICU experiences (stress, parental separation, and pain) is proposed to influence an infant's swinging neurodevelopmental pendulum amid the potential outcomes of risk and resilience.Implications For Practice and Research: Creating language that describes the infant experience brings meaning and calls caregivers and parents to action to consider strategies that may improve long-term health. Actively seeking opportunities to decrease the allostatic load of at-risk infants may support an infant's pendulum to swing toward a path of resilience, thereby moderating his or her early life adverse experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in neonatal care are allowing for increased infant survival; however, neurodevelopmental complications continue. Using a complex adaptive system framework, a broad analysis of the network of agents most influential to vulnerable infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is presented: parent, nurse, and organization. By exploring these interconnected relationships and the emergent behaviors, a model of care that increases parental caregiving in the NICU is proposed. Supportive parent caregiving early in an infant's NICU stay has the potential for more sensitive caregiving and enhanced opportunities for attachment, perhaps positively impacting neurodevelopment.