Search

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a single center's experience with adult patients who had cleft lip, cleft palate, or both. The authors aimed to identify common long-term needs in this patient population and evaluated the relationship of team-based care in meeting those needs. To do so, the authors retrospectively reviewed chart records from a single private practice and tertiary referral cleft center for all patients who were ≥15 years of age and who had a history of clefts of the lip or palate, or both, from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. The authors compared the concerns of the patients who received cleft-team-based care by a single, multidisciplinary cleft team; multiple multidisciplinary cleft teams; or no formal cleft team. The authors analyzed data for 142 patients. The most common patient concerns were lip aesthetics (64%), nose aesthetics (61%), septal deviations (47%), nasal obstruction (44%), malocclusion (32%), oronasal fistulas (29%), and speech (21%). Oronasal fistulas were more commonly reported in the group of patients who had care by multiple teams (42.9%; P < .001). Malocclusion was more commonly reported in the group of patients who had care by multiple teams (50%; P = .001). The authors found that adult patients who have undergone rehabilitation for cleft lip and palate appear to have a common set of long-term needs. Multidisciplinary cleft-team-based care appears to be the most effective way to address these needs.

Education is to be provided efficiently and effectively according to guidelines in the United States by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as core competencies and in Canada by the Royal College according to the CanMEDS framework. This article defines formative feedback, reviews the currently available validated feedback tools, and describes the future use of technology to enhance feedback in plastic surgery education.

Background: The reliability of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction following abdominal liposuction is controversial. The authors' early cases were technically successful; however, they experienced high partial flap loss and fat necrosis rates. The authors sought to compare DIEP flap outcomes in the setting of prior liposuction after the use of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography compared to when flaps were assessed on clinical grounds alone., Methods: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of DIEP flaps following liposuction at a single institution was performed, comparing those evaluated on clinical grounds alone and those in which indocyanine green angiography was used intraoperatively. Outcomes measured included anastomotic complications, total flap loss, partial flap loss, fat necrosis, and postoperative abdominal wounds., Results: Thirteen DIEP flaps following prior liposuction were performed on 11 patients from July of 2003 through January of 2014. All patients had preoperative imaging with duplex ultrasound or computed tomographic angiography to analyze perforator suitability before surgical exploration. Seven flaps were evaluated intraoperatively on clinical grounds alone. Six flaps were assessed and modified based on indocyanine green angiography. All flaps were successful; however, partial flap loss and fat necrosis rates dropped from 71.4 percent to 0 percent when indocyanine green angiography was used intraoperatively (p = 0.02)., Conclusions: Indocyanine green angiography is an excellent vascular imaging modality for intraoperative use to assess flap perfusion, and improves outcomes in DIEP flaps when harvested after prior abdominal suction lipectomy.