Search

Context: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) that included a historic investment in the public health workforce., Program: Charged with implementing this investment, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the Public Health Infrastructure Grant (PHIG). PHIG builds on CDC's experience working with state, local, and territorial public health departments and represents a new approach to strengthening the public health workforce., Implementation: Specifically, PHIG incorporates features that allow these public health departments to prioritize and tailor the funding to meet their communities' needs: 1) focus on workforce as core infrastructure, 2) streamlined programmatic and administrative requirements, 3) more equitable funding approach, and 4) enhanced support from national partners and CDC., Discussion: The goal is to optimize the unprecedented opportunity afforded by ARPA and lead to a stronger public health workforce and infrastructure across the United States., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: In 2008, the $1.2 M sexually transmitted disease (STD) services line item supporting STD clinical services by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health was eliminated, forcing the cessation of all state-supported STD service delivery., Objective: To determine the impact on community provision of STD services after the elimination of state funds supporting STD service provision., Design and Setting: Rapid ethnographic assessments were conducted in May 2010 and September 2013 to better understand the impact of budget cuts on STD services in Massachusetts. The rapid ethnographic assessment teams identified key informants through Massachusetts's STD and human immunodeficiency virus programs., Participants: Fifty providers/clinic administrators in 19 sites (15 unique) participated in a semistructured interview (community health centers [n = 10; 53%], hospitals [n = 4; 21%], and other clinical settings [n = 5; 26%])., Results: Results clustered under 3 themes: financial stability of agencies/clinics, the role insurance played in the provision of STD care, and perceived clinic capacity to offer appropriate STD services. Clinics faced hard choices about whether to provide care to patients or refer elsewhere patients who were unable or unwilling to use insurance. Clinics that decided to see patients regardless of ability to pay often found themselves absorbing costs that were then passed along to their parent agency; the difficulty and financial strain incurred by a clinic's parent agency by providing STD services without support by state grant dollars emerged as a primary concern. Meeting patient demand with staff with appropriate training and expertise remained a concern., Conclusions: Provision of public health by private health care providers may increase concern among some community provision sites about the sustainability of service provision absent external funds, either from the state or from the third-party billing. Resource constraints may be felt across clinic operations. Provision of public health in the for-profit health system involves close consideration of resources, including those: leveraged, used to provide uncompensated care, or available for collection through third-party billing.

Much of the published data on in vitro dissolution of uranium is based on the batch replacement technique. Recent papers have suggested that this technique, though convenient, may produce results that are determined more by the experimental design than by the transportability (solubility) of the material being tested. Re-examination of some of the published data appears to support this suggestion.

A 3-yr study of radioactive materials transportation examined the magnitude of radioactive materials shipments in terms of numbers of packages and motor vehicle trips and types of materials; compliance with regulations for packaging, labelling, handling, external radiation exposure, and surface contamination; and dose to workers as measured with personnel dosimeters. Much of the information was obtained at the Atlanta airport and its vicinity, a package distribution center for the southeastern U.S., and at the Barnwell, S.C. radioactive waste burial site, the destination of most shipments of radioactive waste from or through Georgia. Approximately 12,000 packages in radioactive material categories I, II and III were handled in Georgia each year. Motor vehicles made approximately 3300 trips per year. Some instances of noncompliance were observed, but few of them had the potential for elevated radiation exposure of persons. Several incidents associated with radioactive material transport are reported, of which one may have resulted in slightly elevated exposures to persons. Among drivers and handlers who worked with radioactive material shipments, dosimeters showed that less than one-half of them received radiation doses above background levels. The highest doses were found for drivers who transported large numbers of 99Mo generators.

This paper summarizes the deliberations and conclusions of the Compliance and Policy Committee of the National Workshop for Radioactivity in Drinking Water. Prior to and during the workshop the committee considered a total of 32 possible compliance and policy issues and determined that 22 were valid. The committee developed positions on seven of these and these positions are presented herein. The remaining 25 issues are also listed with the committee's evaluation of each.