Search

Copyright of Implant Dentistry is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Implant Dentistry is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Mandibular fractures (MF) are a daily problem in maxillofacial surgery. A staging system for classifying MF is of paramount importance to plan surgery, to define prognosis, and to exchange information among trauma centers. In this article, a classification for MF is proposed., Methods: The mandible is divided into six sites (symphysis, body, angle, ramus, coronoid, and condyle) and the mandibular nerve divides the alveolar process (i.e., the upper part containing teeth) from the basal bone (placed caudally with respect to the nerve). MF can be summarized using three abbreviations: A = alveolar, B = basal, and C = complete. Consequently, MFs are staged as follows: F in situ = a greenstick fracture; F1 = a single mobile fragment of alveolar or basal bone; F2 = double mobile fractures of the alveolar or basal portion or a single complete separation of the mandibular arch continuity; F3 = a complete double separation of the mandibular arch continuity; F4 = triple or more mandibular arch fragments. To evaluate the suitability of the proposed classification, a retrospective study on a series of 128 patients (and 205 MFs) was performed. Age, gender, stage, clinical diagnosis at admission, type of surgery, and outcome were considered., Results: A good correlation between the proposed classification and the studied variables was detected., Conclusions: The new classification is a simple and precise method for staging MF. It can summarize MFs and be used in daily practice. It is our understanding, however, that a multicenter study should be performed before the effectiveness of the proposed classification can be clearly stated.

The orbit is located in the middle third of the face, composed of several bones and surrounded by complex anatomic structures so that orbital fractures (OF) often involve other parts of the face. A staging system for classifying OF is of paramount importance in order to exchange information between trauma centers. Several classifications have been proposed for describing OF but they have not a single method applicable to the whole orbit. Here, a classification for OF that can be summarized with four abbreviations is proposed. Four letters define the localization (F = frontal, N = nasal, M = maxillary and Z = zygomatic bone fracture), two acronyms describe fragment shift (in = blow-in or out = blow-out), four numbers define ocular movement impairment (1 = superior, 2 = internal, 3 = inferior, and 4 = external extrinsic muscular deficit) and two acronyms describe eye position (EX = exophthalmos and ENO = enophthalmos). To evaluate the suitability of the proposed classification a retrospective study on a series of 190 OFs is performed. Age, gender, new stage, clinical diagnosis at admission, type of surgery, and need for graft for orbital reconstruction are considered. A good correlation between the proposed classification and the studied variables is detected. In conclusion, the proposed classification is a simply and precise method to stage OF. It can summarize OF and be used in the daily practice. However, it is our belief that a multi-center study should be performed before the effectiveness of the proposed classification can be clearly stated.

After having hinted to the various component of the malformity caused by malunions of the distal radius fracture, the various possibilities of correcting this deformity are described. The difficulty to correct all the components of the deformity are considered. Then a Dome-shaped osteotomy of the distal radius is described that allows to correct all the deformities in all the directions as the gliding plane of the osteotomy is spherical. The ulnar plus and the DRUJ alterations are corrected by means of an added Sauvé-Kapandji procedure that guarantees against any painful movement of the DRUJ preserving effective prono-supination.