Search

Background: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is an important part of colorectal surgery training. However, decreasing case numbers create fewer chances to teach the knowledge and skills to trainees., Objective: This purpose of this study is to define the components and format of an adjunctive curriculum for teaching colon and rectal surgery residents ileal pouch anal anastomosis. More specifically, it aims to create expert consensus on the essential and unique elements of a curriculum, determine which alternative strategies will be an acceptable, and to identify methods of assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of the curriculum., Design: This was a modified Delphi Consensus study. Semi-structured interviews with thematic analysis were used to develop the initial round of the survey., Setting/participants: Faculty who were at North American Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education colorectal residencies were invited to participate in the electronic surveys, and participants from each round were invited to subsequent rounds., Outcome Measures: Three rounds of surveys were used to select high priority items for inclusion in the curriculum, educational strategies, and assessments. This was followed by a consensus conference to clarify prioritization and acceptable options for teaching and assessment. Participants from the third round of surveys as well as Program Directors from colorectal residencies were invited to the consensus conference., Results: Twelve semi-structured interviews defined the educational needs of colorectal residents, the appropriateness of alternative educational strategies, and concerns about case minimums as an assessment of readiness for practice for this procedure. The needs were divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases with knowledge and skills in each. The resulting survey was completed by 85 colorectal surgeons in Round 1, 43 in Round 2, and 38 in Round 3. These results were subsequently summarized by a team of 9 participants in a final consensus conference where the participants made suggestions on the recommended educational strategies for each educational need., Limitations: Inclusion of colorectal surgeons involved in training programs only; bias in respondents; participation rate., Conclusions: This shared understanding of educational needs for colorectal residents that includes knowledge, judgement, and technical skills is the first step toward developing a curriculum to teach ileal pouch anal anastomosis. A collaborative effort to create the necessary curriculum is underway. See Video Abstract., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2025.)

Background: Ventral rectopexy has become increasingly utilized in the surgical management of rectal prolapse. There is a need for a contemporary evaluation of the role of the procedure and description of its use in clinical practice., Objective: To create an international consensus on ventral rectopexy., Design: An expert panel undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify subject domains of interest. Literature reviews were completed for each domain with subsequent development of evidence-based and practice-based statements. These were compiled and reviewed by the group over a total of nine meetings. Once statements were confirmed, supportive text was finalized, and an anonymous vote was completed using REDCap to record consensus., Setting: An international expert panel comprising colorectal surgeons who perform ventral rectopexy in a high-volume center., Main Outcome Measures: Statements and associated expert consensus., Results: Eleven experts identified ten domains for review: indications, contraindications, assessment and planning, consent, operative details, prostheses, complications, follow-up, recurrence and reoperative surgery and specific considerations. After round-table review, there were 17 resultant statements for consideration. Experts agreed unanimously with the thirteen of the statements and their accompanying text, with different experts disagreeing each with four statements (91% consensus each)., Limitations: Paucity of high-quality data., Conclusion: This international group developed 17 statements with high consensus. These statements provide an up-to-date summary of the literature, identify key areas for research development and a reference point for colon and rectal surgeons who undertake ventral rectopexy as part of their practice. See Video Abstract., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.)

Background: Narrative operative reports may omit or obscure data from an operation., Objective: To develop a synoptic operative report for rectal prolapse that includes core descriptors as developed by an international consensus of expert pelvic floor surgeons., Design: Descriptors for patients undergoing rectal prolapse surgery were generated through review. Members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium were recruited to participate in a 3-round Delphi process using a 9-point Likert scale. Descriptors that achieved 70% agreement were kept from the first round, and descriptors scoring 40% to 70% agreement were recirculated in subsequent rounds. A final list of operative descriptors was determined at a consensus meeting, with a final consensus meeting more than 70% agreement., Settings: This survey was administered to members of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium., Patients: No patient data are included in this study., Main Outcome Measures: Descriptors meeting greater than 70% agreement were selected., Results: One hundred seventy-six surgeons representing colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, and urologists distributed throughout North America (56%), Latin America (4%), Western Europe (29%), Asia (4%), and Africa (1%) participated in the first round of Delphi voting. After 2 additional rounds and a final consensus meeting, 16 of 30 descriptors met 70% consensus. Descriptors that met consensus were surgery type, posterior dissection, ventral dissection, mesh used, type of mesh used, mesh location, sutures used, suture type, pouch of Douglas and peritoneum reclosed, length of rectum imbricated, length of bowel resected, levatoroplasty, simultaneous vaginal procedure, simultaneous gynecologic procedure, simultaneous enterocele repair, and simultaneous urinary incontinence procedure., Limitations: The survey represents the views of members of the Delphi panel and may not represent the viewpoints of all surgeons., Conclusions: This Delphi survey establishes international consensus descriptors for intraoperative variables that have been used to produce a synoptic operative report. This will help establish defined operative reporting to improve clinical communication, quality measures, and clinical research. See Video Abstract ., Desarrollo De Un Protocolo Operatorio Sinptico Derivado De Consenso Para El Prolapso Rectal Un Informe Del Consorcio De Trastornos Del Piso Plvico: ANTECEDENTES:Los protocolos operativos narrativos frecuentemente pueden omitir u oscurecer datos de un procedimiento.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo es desarrollar un protocolo operatorio sinóptico para el prolapso rectal que incluya descriptores básicos desarrollados por un consenso internacional de cirujanos expertos en piso pélvico.DISEÑO:Los descriptores para pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso rectal se generaron mediante revisión. Se reclutó a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico para participar en un proceso Delphi de 3 rondas utilizando una escala Likert de 9 puntos. Los descriptores que lograron un 70% de acuerdo se mantuvieron en la primera ronda, los descriptores que obtuvieron un 40-70% de acuerdo se recircularon en rondas posteriores. Se determinó una lista final de descriptores operativos en una reunión de consenso, con una reunión de consenso final de más del 70% de acuerdo.ESCENARIO:Esta fue una encuesta administrada a miembros del Consorcio de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se seleccionaron los descriptores que cumplieron más del 70% de acuerdo.RESULTADOS:Ciento setenta y seis cirujanos en representación de cirujanos colorrectales, uroginecólogos y urólogos distribuidos en América del Norte (56%), América Latina (4%), Europa Occidental (29%), Asia (4%) y África (1%) participaron en la primera ronda de votación Delphi. Después de dos rondas adicionales y una reunión de consenso final, 16 de 30 descriptores alcanzaron un 70% de consenso. Los descriptores que alcanzaron consenso fueron: tipo de cirugía, disección posterior, disección ventral, malla utilizada, tipo de malla utilizada, ubicación de la malla, suturas utilizadas, tipo de sutura, cierre del fondo de saco de Douglas y peritoneo, longitud del recto superpuesto, longitud del intestino resecado, plastía de los elevadores , procedimiento vaginal simultáneo, procedimiento ginecológico simultáneo, reparación simultánea de enterocele y procedimiento simultáneo de incontinencia urinaria.LIMITACIONES:La encuesta representa las opiniones de los miembros del panel Delphi y puede no representar los puntos de vista de todos los cirujanos.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Esta encuesta Delphi establece descriptores de consenso internacional para las variables intraoperatorias que se han utilizado para producir un protocolo operatorio sinóptico. Esto ayudará a establecer protocolos operativos definidos para mejorar la comunicación clínica, las medidas de calidad y la investigación clínica. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Background: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse is associated with unique technical challenges, partially determined by the surgical approach used for the index operation. Success rates are variable, and data to determine the best approach in patients with recurring prolapse are lacking., Objective: The study aimed to assess current surgical approaches to patients with prior rectal prolapse repairs and to compare short-term outcomes of de novo and redo procedures, including recurrence of rectal prolapse., Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database., Settings: The Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement database. De-identified surgeons at more than 25 sites (81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, prior repairs, symptoms of incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including history of concomitant repairs and prior prolapse repairs., Patients: Patients who were offered surgery for full thickness rectal prolapse., Interventions: Incidence and type of repair used for prior rectal prolapse surgery were recorded. Primary and secondary outcomes of index and redo operations were calculated. Patients undergoing rectal prolapse re-repair (redo) were compared with patients undergoing first (de novo) rectal prolapse repair. The incidence of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo operations was quantified., Outcomes: The primary outcome of rectal prolapse recurrence in de novo and redo settings., Results: Eighty-nine (19.3%) of 461 patients underwent redo rectal prolapse repair. On short-term follow-up, redo patients had prolapse recurrence rates similar to those undergoing de novo repair. However, patients undergoing redo procedures rarely had the same operation as their index procedure., Limitations: Self-reported, de-identified data., Conclusion: Our results suggest that recurrent rectal prolapse surgery is feasible and can offer adequate rates of rectal prolapse durability in the short term but may argue for a change in surgical approach for redo procedures when clinically feasible. See Video Abstract ., Los Enfoques Duraderos Para La Reparacin Del Prolapso Rectal Recurrente Pueden Requerir Evitar El Procedimiento Ndice: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal recurrente se asocia con desafíos técnicos únicos, determinados en parte por el abordaje quirúrgico utilizado para la operación inicial. Las tasas de éxito son variables y faltan datos para determinar el mejor abordaje en pacientes con prolapso recurrente.OBJETIVO:Evaluar los enfoques quirúrgicos actuales para pacientes con reparaciones previas de prolapso rectal y comparar los resultados a corto plazo de los procedimientos de novo y rehacer, incluida la recurrencia del prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.AJUSTE:Base de datos de mejora prospectiva de la calidad del Consorcio multicéntrico de trastornos del suelo pélvico. Cirujanos no identificados en más de 25 sitios (81% de alto volumen) informaron datos demográficos de los pacientes, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia y defecación obstruida y detalles operativos, incluido el historial de reparaciones concomitantes y reparaciones previas de prolapso.INTERVENCIONES:Se registro la incidencia y el tipo de reparación utilizada para la cirugía de prolapso rectal previa. Se calcularon los resultados primarios y secundarios de las operaciones de índice y reoperacion. Se compararon los pacientes sometidos a una nueva reparación (reoperacion) de prolapso rectal con pacientes sometidos a una primera reparación (de novo) de prolapso rectal. Se cuantificó la incidencia de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en operaciones de novo y rehacer.RESULTADOS:El resultado primario de recurrencia del prolapso rectal en entornos de novo y redo. Ochenta y nueve (19,3%) de 461 pacientes se sometieron a una nueva reparación del prolapso rectal. En el seguimiento a corto plazo, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron tasas de recurrencia de prolapso similares a los de los sometidos a reparación de novo. Sin embargo, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos de rehacer rara vez tuvieron la misma operación que su procedimiento índice.LIMITACIONES:Datos no identificados y autoinformados.CONCLUSIONES/DISCUSIÓN:Nuestros resultados sugieren que la cirugía de prolapso rectal recurrente es factible y puede ofrecer tasas adecuadas de durabilidad del prolapso rectal en el corto plazo, pero puede abogar por un cambio en el enfoque quirúrgico para rehacer los procedimientos cuando sea clínicamente factible. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.)

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery Delphi Consensus Study identified 7 symptoms and 7 consequences as key domains for evaluating and analyzing ileoanal pouch function., Objective: This study aimed to use items identified as priorities by the Patient-Reported Outcomes After Pouch Surgery Delphi Consensus Study to create a validated tool for quantifying pouch function., Design: Patients were administered a questionnaire-based survey eliciting responses regarding frequency of a variety of bowel symptoms., Setting: Patients with pouches were recruited at IBD centers and via patient advocacy websites., Main Outcome Measures: Associations between items and quality of life were computed in a score generation cohort of 298 patients by logistic regression modeling. Individual score values were designated to items to create an additive score titled the Ileoanal Pouch Syndrome Severity Score. Validity was tested in a subsequent cohort of 386 patients using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve. In addition, test-retest validity, convergent validity, and clinical validity were evaluated., Results: After the determination of item weights, the range of possible scores was found to be 0 to 145. Score ranges were then determined as cutoff values for "ileoanal pouch syndrome." The score was then validated on the second patient cohort, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.83. Importantly, worsening severity of Ileoanal Pouch Syndrome Score significantly correlated with higher rates of poor quality of life. Finally, the questionnaire was rigorously validated to show test-retest validity, convergent validity compared to other bowel function scores, and clinical validity., Conclusions: This study developed a patient-centered, clinically useful scoring system that can quantify the range and severity of symptoms experienced by patients with ileoanal pouches and their correlation with quality of life., Desarrollo Y Validacin De Un Sistema De Puntuacin Basado En Sntomas Para La Disfuncin Intestinal Despus De La Reconstruccin Con Reservorio Ileoanal La Puntuacin De Gravedad Del Sndrome De Reservorio Ileoanal: ANTECEDENTES:En el estudio Delphi Consensus los resultados informados por el paciente después de la cirugía de reservorio identificaron 7 síntomas y 7 consecuencias como dominios clave para evaluar y analizar la función del reservorio ileoanal.OBJETIVO:Utilizar elementos identificados como prioritarios por el estudio de consenso Delphi de resultados informados por el paciente después de la cirugía de reservorio para crear una herramienta validada para cuantificar la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:A los pacientes se les administró una encuesta basada en un cuestionario que obtuvo respuestas con respecto a la frecuencia de una variedad de síntomas intestinales.ESCENARIO:Los pacientes con reservorio fueron reclutados en centros de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y a través de sitios web dirigidos al paciente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las asociaciones entre los elementos y la calidad de vida se calcularon en una cohorte de generación de puntuación de 298 pacientes mediante un modelo de regresión logística. Se asignaron valores de puntuación individuales a los elementos para crear una puntuación aditiva denominada Puntuación de gravedad del síndrome de reservorio ileoanal. La validez se probó en una cohorte posterior de 386 pacientes utilizando el área característica operativa del receptor bajo la curva. Además, se evaluaron la validez del test-retest, la validez convergente y la validez clínica.RESULTADOS:Después de determinar el peso de los elementos, el rango de puntajes posibles fue de 0 a 145. Los rangos de puntaje se determinaron luego como valores de corte para el "síndrome de la reservorio ileoanal". A continuación, la puntuación se validó en la segunda cohorte de pacientes, con un área característica operativa del receptor bajo la curva de 0.3. Es importante destacar que el empeoramiento de la gravedad de la puntuación del síndrome de reservorio ileoanal se correlacionó significativamente con tasas más altas de mala calidad de vida. Por último, el cuestionario fue rigurosamente validado para mostrar validez test-retest, validez convergente en comparación con otras puntuaciones de función intestinal y validez clínica.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio desarrolló un sistema de puntuación clínicamente útil y centrado en el paciente que puede cuantificar el rango y la gravedad de los síntomas experimentados por los pacientes con reservorio ileoanal y su correlación con la calidad de vida. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is reported in 30% of women presenting with rectal prolapse. Combined repair is a viable option to avoid the need for future pelvic floor interventions. However, the added impact of adding a modicum of middle compartment suspension by closing the pouch of Douglas during a rectal prolapse repair has not been studied., Objective: The study aimed to assess the impact of middle compartment suspension on the durability of rectal prolapse repair. We also aimed to determine whether adding some form of pouch of Douglas closure to achieve middle compartment suspension leads to any improvements in the rates or severity of postoperative constipation or in the rates or severity of postoperative fecal incontinence., Design: This study was a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective database., Setting: Data were analyzed from the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Quality Improvement in Rectal Prolapse Surgery database. Deidentified surgeons at more than 20 sites (75% academic, 81% high volume) self-reported patient demographics, previous repairs, symptoms of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation, and operative details, including addition of concomitant gynecologic repairs, use of mesh, posterior or ventral dissection, and sigmoidectomy., Patients: Patients were included who underwent abdominal repair for rectal prolapse., Interventions: Abdominal rectopexy procedures with and without middle compartment suspension were compared. Middle compartment suspension was defined as excision and closure of the pouch of Douglas with some degree of colpopexy or culdoplasty., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome of prolapse recurrence and secondary outcomes of incontinence and constipation were calculated via univariate and multivariable regression by comparing those who underwent rectopexy with and without middle compartment suspension., Results: Of the 198 patients (98% female, age 60.2 ± 15.6 years) who underwent abdominal repairs (59% robotic), 138 patients (70%) underwent some concomitant middle compartment suspension. Patients who had an added middle compartment suspension seemed to have lower early rectal prolapse recurrences. On multivariable regression to control for age, previous repairs, and the use of mesh, addition of some form of pouch of Douglas repair was associated with a decrease in short-term recurrences., Limitations: Our data need to be interpreted cautiously. Future studies are critically needed to further explore this observation, with an a priori, prospective definition of middle compartment suspension, validated measurement of concomitant pathology, and longer follow-up., Conclusion: Our results suggest that some middle compartment suspension at the time of rectal prolapse repair may improve short-term durability of rectal prolapse repair. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C30 ., La Reparacin Concomitante Del Prolapso De Rganos Plvicos En El Momento De La Rectopexia Afecta Las Tasas De Recurrencia Del Prolapso Rectal Una Revisin Retrospectiva De Una Base De Datos Recopilada Prospectivamente Del Consorcio Sobre La Mejora De La Calidad De Trastornos Del Piso Plvico: ANTECEDENTES:El prolapso de órganos pélvicos se informa en el 30 % de las mujeres que presentan prolapso rectal y la reparación combinada es una opción viable para evitar la necesidad de futuras intervenciones del suelo pélvico. Sin embargo, no se ha estudiado el impacto adicional de agregar un mínimo de suspensión del compartimento medio cerrando el fonde de saco de Douglas durante una reparación de prolapso rectal.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar el impacto de la suspensión del compartimento medio con respecto a la durabilidad de la reparación del prolapso rectal. Quisimos de igual manera determinar si el agregado de algún tipo de cierre del fondo de saco de Douglas para lograr la suspensión del compartimento medio conduce a alguna mejora en las tasas o la gravedad del estreñimiento posoperatorio así como en las tasas o la gravedad de la incontinencia fecal posoperatoria.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva.ESCENARIO:Base de datos Multicenter Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium Prospective Quality Improvement. Cirujanos no identificados en >20 sitios (75% académicos, 81% de alto volumen) datos demográficos de pacientes auto informados, reparaciones previas, síntomas de incontinencia fecal y defecación obstruida, y detalles quirúrgicos, incluida la suma de reparaciones ginecológicas concomitantes, uso de malla, disección anterior o posterior y sigmoidectomía.INTERVENCIONES:Se compararon los procedimientos de rectopexia abdominal con y sin suspensión del compartimento medio). La suspensión del compartimento medio se definió como la escisión y cierre del fondo de saco de Douglas con algún grado de colpopexia o culdoplastia.RESULTADOS:El resultado principal de la recurrencia del prolapso y los resultados secundarios de incontinencia y estreñimiento se calcularon mediante regresión uni y multivariable al comparar los que fueron sometidos a rectopexia con y sin suspensión del compartimento medio.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a reparación abdominal por prolapso rectal.RESULTADOS:De los 198 pacientes (98% mujeres, edad 60,2 ± 15,6 años) sometidas a reparaciones abdominales (59% robótica), 138 (70%) fueron sometidas igualmente y de manera concomitante a alguna suspensión del compartimento medio. Los pacientes a los que se les añadió una suspensión del compartimento medio parecían tener menores recurrencias tempranas del prolapso rectal y, en la regresión multivariable para controlar la edad, las reparaciones previas y el uso de malla, la adición de alguna forma de reparación del fondo de saco de Douglas se asoció con una disminución de las recurrencias a corto plazo.LIMITACIONES:Nuestros datos deben interpretarse con cautela. Se necesitan de manera critica, estudios futuros para explorar más a fondo esta observación, con una definición prospectiva a priori de la suspensión del compartimento medio, una medición validada de la patología concomitante y un seguimiento más prolongado.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestros resultados sugieren que alguna suspensión del compartimento medio en el momento de la reparación del prolapso rectal puede mejorar la durabilidad a corto plazo de la reparación del prolapso rectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C30 . (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

Background: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative links payments for Medicare beneficiaries during an episode of care (90 days from index surgery)., Objective: This study aimed to determine whether major bowel participating Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations experience greater cost savings for colectomy while maintaining satisfactory quality outcomes compared to nonparticipating organizations., Design: This is an Analysis of all Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participating hospitals for major bowel procedures (major bowel group) and propensity score-matched against Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations that do not include major bowel procedures (nonmajor bowel group) and those that do not participate in any Bundled Payments for Care Improvement program (non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group)., Setting: Programs accepting Medicare and Medicaid in the United States., Patients: Patients included were major bowel cases in the Medicare Standard Analytic file within Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups 329-331 at participating facilities between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016., Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures included average total care expenditure and quality of care (length of stay, morbidity, and mortality) from 3 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively., Results: We abstracted 7609 major bowel episodes from 23 major bowel group facilities, 21,872 episodes from nonmajor bowel-matched hospitals, and 19,383 episodes from non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-matched hospitals. From the baseline (January 2011 to June 2012) to final period (July 2015 to June 2016), we noted a $2955 average reduction in care expenditures. The largest decrease in average total episode expenditure occurred within the major bowel group (14% reduction) compared to the other groups (6% reduction for nonmajor bowel and 5% reduction for non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement). Utilizing a generalized estimating equation to adjust for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, the average total episode expenditure for the major bowel group decreased by $4885 (95% CI $4838-$4932; p < 0.001) compared to $2050 (95% CI $2038-$2061) for the non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group. All groups had similar reductions in length of stay, 30-day and 90-day complication rates, and readmission rates., Limitations: Analyses were limited by the retrospective nature of the study., Conclusions: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participation for major bowel procedures resulted in a greater decrease in average total cost per episode of care than in nonparticipating hospitals without compromise in quality of care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837.IMPACTO DE LA INICIATIVA BUNDLED PAYMENT AGRUPADOS PARA LA MEJORA DE LA ATENCIÓN DEL GASTO SANITARIO EN LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS INTESTINALES MAYORESANTECEDENTES:La iniciativa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención vincula los pagos para los beneficiarios de Medicare durante un episodio de atención (90 días desde la cirugía índice).OBJETIVO:Determinar si las principales organizaciones de Bundled Payment para el mejoramiento de la atención relacionados a los procedimientos intestinales experimentan mayores ahorros en los costos para una colectomía manteniendo resultados satisfactorios de calidad en comparación con las organizaciones no participantes.DISEÑO:Análisis de todos los hospitales participantes del programa Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención para procedimientos intestinales mayores (grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores) y puntaje de propensión comparado con las organizaciones que no incluyen dichos procedimientos (grupo que no incluye procedimientos intestinales mayores) y aquellos que no participan en ningún programa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención (grupo no BPCI).MARCO:Programas que aceptan Medicare y Medicaid en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Casos intestinales mayores en el archivo analítico estándar de Medicare dentro de los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico 329-331 en los centros participantes entre el 1/1/2011-30/6/2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Gasto total promedio y calidad de la atención (duración de la estadía, morbilidad, mortalidad) desde los 3 días preoperatorio hasta los 90 días postoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Hemos extraído 7609 episodios intestinales mayores de 23 instalaciones del grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 21.872 episodios de hospitales del grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores y 19.383 episodios de hospitales del grupo no BPCI. Desde la línea de base (1/2011 - 6/2012) hasta el período final (7/2015 - 6/2016), notamos una reducción promedio de $2955 en los gastos de atención. La mayor disminución en el gasto promedio total por episodios ocurrió dentro del grupo que incluyen intestinales mayores (14% de reducción) en comparación con los otros grupos (6% de reducción para el grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 5% de reducción para el no BPCI). Utilizando una ecuación de estimación generalizada para ajustar los datos demográficos del paciente, las comorbilidades y las características del hospital, el gasto total promedio por episodio para el grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores disminuyó en $ 4885 (IC del 95%: $4838-4932; p <0,001) en comparación con $2050 (IC del 95%: $2038-2061) para el grupo que no pertenece al programa BPCI. Todos los grupos tuvieron reducciones similares en la duración de la estancia, tasas de complicaciones de 30/90 días y de readmisión.LIMITACIONES:Análisis limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención en aquellos procedimientos intestinales mayores resultó en una disminución mayor en el costo total promedio por episodio de atención que en los hospitales no participantes, sin comprometer la calidad de la atención. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto)., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: Constipation is highly prevalent. Women with constipation are evaluated for the presence of vaginal prolapse that may contribute to obstructed defecation syndrome. Defecography can identify anatomic causes of obstructed defecation syndrome (rectocele, intussusception, and enterocele)., Objective: This study aimed to assess the characteristics of women with obstructed defecation syndrome and radiographic rectoceles with and without posterior vaginal wall prolapse and to characterize the relationship between anatomical abnormalities and dysfunction., Design: This is a retrospective case-control study of women with obstructed defecation syndrome who had radiographic rectoceles on defecography., Settings: Women who presented to a Pelvic Floor Disorders Center were included., Patients: Cases were defined as constipated women with radiographic rectoceles and at least stage II posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination. Controls were patients with radiographic rectoceles but without posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination., Main Outcome Measures: Patient characteristics, anorectal testing results, and validated questionnaires were compared between groups., Results: A total of 106 women met inclusion criteria. Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse (48 (45.3%)) had larger rectoceles on defecography than women without it on examination (3.4 cm vs 3.0 cm, p < 0.01). Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination were more likely to splint during defecation than women without vaginal wall prolapse (63.8% vs 27.3%, p < 0.01). All other defecatory symptoms, anorectal manometry parameters, and questionnaire responses were similar between groups., Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective study design. Our data were taken from a single institution within a center specializing in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders, potentially limiting generalizability., Conclusions: Patients with constipation, radiographic rectoceles, and vaginal prolapse may differ from those without evidence of prolapse. Patients with vaginal prolapse were more likely to splint to aide evacuation and demonstrated larger rectoceles on defecography. Further studies are needed to determine whether constipation causes progression along this continuum or whether progression of prolapse is a cause of worsening defecatory dysfunction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626., Rectoceles Existe Una Correlacin Entre La Presencia De Prolapso Vaginal Y Los Hallazgos Radiolgicos En Mujeres Sintomticas: ANTECEDENTES:El estreñimiento es una enfermedad muy prevalente. Las mujeres con estreñimiento se evalúan para detectar la presencia de prolapso vaginal que pueda contribuir al síndrome de defecación obstructiva. La defecografía puede identificar las causas anatómicas del síndrome de defecación obstructiva (rectocele, invaginación intestinal (intususcepción) y enterocele).OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las características de las mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva y la presencia de rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, con y sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior, y caracterizar la relación entre las anomalías anatómicas y la presencia de disfunción.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles, de mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva, que tenían rectocele como hallazgo radiológico en una defecografía.MARCO:Mujeres que acudieron a un Centro de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico.PACIENTES:Los casos fueron definidos como mujeres con estreñimiento con hallazgos radiológicos de rectocele, con al menos un prolapso estadio II de la pared vaginal posterio, en el examen físico. Los controles fueron pacientes con solo rectocele por hallazgos radiológicos, sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen físico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon entre los grupos: las características de las pacientes, los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas anorrectales y los cuestionarios validados.RESULTADOS:Un total de 106 mujeres cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior 48 (45,3%) tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía en comparación con las mujeres sin rectocele en el examen físico (3,4 cm versus 3,0 cm, p <0,01). Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer una maniobra de presión manual o digital del periné durante la defecación, comparado con las mujeres sin rectocele clínico (63,8% versus 27,3%, p <0,01). Todos los demás síntomas defecatorios, los parámetros de la manometría anorrectal, y las respuestas al cuestionario fueron similares entre los grupos.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo. Los datos fueron obtenidos de la base de datos de un centro especializado en el tratamiento de los trastornos del piso pélvico lo que potencialmente limita generalizar.CONCLUSIONES:Las pacientes con estreñimiento, rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, y prolapso vaginal pueden ser diferentes de aquellas sin evidencia de prolapso. Las pacientes con prolapso vaginal, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer maniobras manuales o digitales de presión a nivel del periné para ayudar a la evacuación, y tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar si el estreñimiento causa que el rectocele aumente progresivamente de tamaño, empeorando la disfunción defecatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: The surgical management of rectal prolapse is constantly evolving, yet numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses studying operative approaches have failed to make meaningful conclusions., Objective: The purpose of this study was to report on preliminary data captured during a large-scale quality improvement initiative to measure and improve function in patients undergoing rectal prolapse repair., Design: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected surgical quality improvement data., Settings: This study was conducted at 14 tertiary centers specializing in pelvic floor disorders from 2017 to 2019., Patients: A total of 181 consecutive patients undergoing external rectal prolapse repair were included., Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Wexner incontinence score and Altomare obstructed defecation score were measured., Results: The cohort included 112 patients undergoing abdominal surgery (71 suture rectopexy/56% minimally invasive, 41 ventral rectopexy/93% minimally invasive). Those offered perineal approaches (n = 68) were older (median age, 75 vs 62 y; p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (ASA 3-4: 51% vs 24%; p < 0.01) but also reported higher preintervention rates of fecal incontinence (Wexner 11.4 ± 6.4 vs 8.6 ± 5.8; p < 0.01). Patients undergoing perineal procedures had similar incremental improvements in function after surgery as patients undergoing abdominal repair (change in Wexner, -2.6 ± 6.4 vs -3.1 ± 5.6, p = 0.6; change in Altomare, -2.9 ± 4.6 vs -2.7 ± 4.9, p = 0.8). Similarly, patients undergoing posterior suture rectopexy and ventral mesh rectopexy had similar incremental improvements in overall scores; however, patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy had a higher decrease in the need to use pads after surgery., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective data analysis and 3-month follow-up., Conclusions: Functional outcomes improved in all of the patients undergoing prolapse surgery. Larger cohorts are necessary to show superiority among surgical procedures. Quality improvement methods may allow for systematic yet practical acquisition of information and data analysis. We call for the creation of a robust database to benefit this patient population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581., Reporte Preliminar Del Consorcio De Trastornos Del Piso Plvico Recoleccin De Datos a Gran Escala Mediante Iniciativas De Mejoramiento De La Calidad Para Proporcionar Informacin Sobre Los Resultados Funcionales: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal está evolucionando constantemente, sin embargo, numerosos estudios clínicos y metaanálisis que evalúan los tratamientos quirúrgicos no han logrado demostrar conclusiones significativas.OBJETIVO:Reportar datos preliminares obtenidos a gran escala durante una iniciativa de mejoramiento de la calidad para medir y mejorar la función en pacientes sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo de datos recolectados prospectivamente de mejoramiento de la calidad quirúrgica.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en 14 centros terciarios especializados en trastornos del piso pélvico del 2017 al 2019.PACIENTES:Un total de 181 pacientes consecutivos sometidos a reparación de prolapso rectal externo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Escala de incontinencia de Wexner y de defecación obstruida de Altomare preoperatoria y tres meses postoperatoria.RESULTADOS:El cohorte incluyó 112 pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal (71 rectopexia con sutura / 56% minimally invasive, 41 rectopexia ventral / 93% minimally invasive). Aquellos a los que se les realizaron abordajes perineales (n = 68) eran mayores (edad media de 75 vs. 62, p <0,01) y tenían mayorcomorbilidades (ASA 3-4: 51% vs. 24%, p <0,01), además reportaron una mayor tasa de incontinencia fecal previo a la intervención (Wexner 11,4 ± 6,4 vs. 8,6 +/- 5,8, p <0,01). Posterior a la cirugía, los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos perineales tuvieron mejoría progresiva en la función similar que los pacientes sometidos a reparación abdominal (cambio en Wexner -2,6 ± 6,4 vs. -3,1 ± 5,6, p = 0,6; cambio en Altomare -2,9 ± 4,6 vs. -2,7 ± 4,9, p = 0,8). De manera similar, los pacientes con rectopexia posterior con sutura y rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron mejoría progresiva similares en las escalas generales; no obstante, pacientes con rectopexia ventral con malla tuvieron una mayor disminución en la necesidad de usar paños protectores después de la cirugía.LIMITACIONES:Análisis de datos retrospectivo y seguimiento de tres meses.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados funcionales mejoraron en todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía de prolapso. Se necesitan cohortes más grandes para demostrar superioridad entre los procedimientos quirúrgicos. Métodos de mejoramiento de la calidad pueden permitir la adquisición sistemática, pero práctica de información y análisis de datos. Hacemos un llamado para la creación de una base de datos sólida para beneficiar a esta población de pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B581. (Traducción- Dr Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon)., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: Functional outcomes after ileoanal pouch creation have been studied; however, there is great variability in how relevant outcomes are defined and reported. More importantly, the perspective of patients has not been represented in deciding which outcomes should be the focus of research., Objective: The primary aim was to create a patient-centered definition of core symptoms that should be included in future studies of pouch function., Design: This was a Delphi consensus study., Setting: Three rounds of surveys were used to select high-priority items. Survey voting was followed by a series of online patient consultation meetings used to clarify voting trends. A final online consensus meeting with representation from all 3 expert panels was held to finalize a consensus statement., Patients: Expert stakeholders were chosen to correlate with the clinical scenario of the multidisciplinary team that cares for pouch patients, including patients, colorectal surgeons, and gastroenterologists or other clinicians., Main Outcome Measures: A consensus statement was the main outcome., Results: patients, 62 colorectal surgeons, and 48 gastroenterologists or nurse specialists completed all 3 Delphi rounds. Fifty-three patients participated in online focus groups. One hundred sixty-one stakeholders participated in the final consensus meeting. On conclusion of the consensus meeting, 7 bowel symptoms and 7 consequences of undergoing ileoanal pouch surgery were included in the final consensus statement., Limitations: The study was limited by online recruitment bias., Conclusions: This study is the first to identify key functional outcomes after pouch surgery with direct input from a large panel of ileoanal pouch patients. The inclusion of patients in all stages of the consensus process allowed for a true patient-centered approach in defining the core domains that should be focused on in future studies of pouch function. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571., Los Pacientes Sometidos a Ciruga De Reservorio Ileoanal Experimentan Una Constelacin De Sntomas Y Consecuencias Que Representan Un Sndrome Unico: Un Informe de los Resultados Reportados por los Pacientes Posterior a la Cirugía de Reservorio (PROPS) Estudio de Consenso DelphiANTECEDENTES:Los resultados funcionales después de la creación del reservorio ileoanal han sido estudiados; sin embargo, existe una gran variabilidad en la forma en que se definen y reportan los resultados relevantes. Más importante aún, la perspectiva de los pacientes no se ha representado a la hora de decidir qué resultados deberían ser el foco de investigación.OBJETIVO:El objetivo principal era crear en el paciente una definición centrada de los síntomas principales que debería incluirse en los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio.DISEÑO:Estudio de consenso Delphi.ENTORNO CLINICO:Se emplearon tres rondas de encuestas para seleccionar elementos de alta prioridad. La votación de la encuesta fue seguida por una serie de reuniones de consulta de pacientes en línea que se utilizan para aclarar las tendencias de votación. Se realizo una reunión de consenso final en línea con representación de los tres paneles de expertos para finalizar una declaración de consenso.PACIENTES:Se eligieron partes interesadas expertas para correlacionar con el escenario clínico del equipo multidisciplinario que atiende a los pacientes con reservorio: pacientes, cirujanos colorrectales, gastroenterólogos / otros médicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Declaración de consenso.RESULTADOS:Ciento noventa y cinco pacientes, 62 cirujanos colorrectales y 48 gastroenterólogos / enfermeras especialistas completaron las tres rondas Delphi. 53 pacientes participaron en grupos focales en línea. 161 interesados participaron en la reunión de consenso final. Al concluir la reunión de consenso, siete síntomas intestinales y siete consecuencias de someterse a una cirugía de reservorio ileoanal se incluyeron en la declaración de consenso final.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de reclutamiento en línea.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio es el primero en identificar resultados funcionales claves después de la cirugía de reservorio con información directa de un gran panel de pacientes con reservorio ileoanal. La inclusión de pacientes en todas las etapas del proceso de consenso permitió un verdadero enfoque centrado en el paciente para definir los dominios principales en los que debería centrarse los estudios futuros de la función del reservorio. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B571., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: The influence of microsatellite instability on prognosis in high-risk stage II colon cancer is unknown., Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between microsatellite instability and overall survival in high-risk stage II colon cancer., Design: This is a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016., Settings: This study included national cancer epidemiology data from the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer., Patients: Included were 16,788 patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma and known microsatellite status (1709 microsatellite unstable)., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was overall survival., Results: Microsatellite unstable cancers with high-risk features had significantly better overall survival than microsatellite stable cancers with high-risk features (5-year survival 80% vs 72%, p = 0.01), and had survival equivalent to microsatellite stable cancers with low-risk features (5-year survival, 80%). When stratified by specific high-risk features, patients with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or high-grade histology had overall survival similar to patients without these features, only in microsatellite unstable cancers. However, patients with high-risk features of T4 stage, positive margins, and <12 lymph nodes saw no survival benefit based on microsatellite status. This was confirmed on multivariable Cox regression modeling. A subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive chemotherapy similarly demonstrated that microsatellite unstable cancers with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or high-grade histology had overall survival similar to microsatellite unstable cancers without those features., Limitations: The study is limited by the lack of specific clinical data and potential treatment bias., Conclusions: In microsatellite unstable cancers, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and high-grade histology are not associated with worse overall survival, even when deferring adjuvant chemotherapy. These data support National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations to forego chemotherapy in stage II cancers with microsatellite instability and these features. In contrast, some high-risk features were associated with worse survival despite microsatellite unstable biology, and therapies to improve survival need to be explored. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B500. ¿EL ESTADO MICROSATÉLITE ESTÁ ASOCIADO CON EL PRONÓSTICO EN EL CÁNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO II CON CARACTERÍSTICAS DE ALTO RIESGO: Se desconoce la influencia de la inestabilidad microsatélite en el pronóstico del cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Investigar la relación entre la inestabilidad microsatélite y la supervivencia general en el cáncer de colon en estadio II de alto riesgo.Revisión retrospectiva de la base de datos nacional del cáncer de 2010 a 2016.Este estudio incluyó datos nacionales de epidemiología del cáncer de la Comisión de Cáncer del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.16,788 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de colon en estadio II y estado microsatélite conocido (1,709 microsatélite inestables).Supervivencia global.Los cánceres microsatélite inestables con características de alto riesgo tuvieron una supervivencia general significativamente mejor que los cánceres microsatélite estables con características de alto riesgo (supervivencia a 5 años 80% vs 72%, p = 0.01), y tuvieron una supervivencia equivalente a los cánceres microsatélite estables con características de bajo riesgo (supervivencia a 5 años 80%). Al estratificar por características específicas de alto riesgo, los pacientes con invasión linfovascular, invasión perineural o histología de alto grado tuvieron una supervivencia general similar a la de los pacientes sin estas características, solo en cánceres microsatélite inestables. Sin embargo, los pacientes con características de alto riesgo en estadio T4, márgenes positivos y <12 ganglios linfáticos no tuvieron ningún beneficio de supervivencia basado en el estado de microsatélites. Esto se confirmó en un modelo de regresión de Cox multivariable. Un análisis de subgrupos de pacientes que no recibieron quimioterapia demostró de manera similar que los cánceres microsatélite inestables con invasión linfovascular, invasión perineural o histología de alto grado tenían una supervivencia general similar a los cánceres microsatélite inestables sin esas características.El estudio está limitado por la falta de datos clínicos específicos y el posible sesgo de tratamiento.En los cánceres microsatélite inestables, la invasión linfovascular, la invasión perineural y la histología de alto grado no se asocian con una peor sobrevida general, incluso cuando se aplaza la quimioterapia adyuvante. Estos datos respaldan las recomendaciones de la National Comprehensive Cancer Network de omitir la quimioterapia en los cánceres en estadio II con inestabilidad microsatélite y estas características. Por el contrario, algunas características de alto riesgo se asociaron con una peor supervivencia a pesar de la biología microsatélite inestable, y es necesario considerar las terapias para mejorar la supervivencia.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B500. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Background: The incidence of diverticular disease is growing in the Western world. However, the global burden of disease is unknown in the developing world., Objective: This study aimed to determine the global burden of diverticular disease as measured by disease-specific mortality while identifying indicators of rising disease rates., Design: We undertook an ecological analysis based on data from the World Health Organization Mortality Database. Then, we analyzed global age-adjusted mortality rates from diverticular disease and compared them to national rates of overweight adults, health expenditures, and dietary composition., Settings: National vital statistics data were collected., Patients: Diverticular disease deaths from January 1, 1994 through December 31, 2016 were evaluated., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measured was the national age-adjusted mortality rate., Results: The average age-adjusted mortality rate for diverticular disease was 0.51 ± 0.31/100,000 with a range of 0.11 to 1.75/100,000. During the study period, we noted that 57% of nations had increasing diverticular disease mortality rates, whereas only 7% had decreasing rates. More developed nations (40%) than developing nations (24%) were categorized as having high diverticular disease mortality burden over the time period of the study, and developed nations had higher percentages of overweight adults (58.9 ± 3.1%) than developing nations (50.6 ± 6.7%; p < 0.0001). However, developing nations revealed more rapid increases in diverticular disease mortality (0.027 ± 0.024/100,000 per year) than developed nations (0.005 ± 0.025/100,000 per year; p = 0.001), as well as faster expanding proportions of overweight adults (0.76 ± 0.12% per year) than in already developed nations (0.53 ± 0.10% per year; p<0.0001)., Limitations: Ecological studies cannot define cause and effect., Conclusions: There is considerable variability in diverticular disease mortality across the globe. Developing nations were characterized by rapid increases in diverticular disease mortality and expanding percentages of overweight adults. Public health interventions in developing nations are needed to alter mortality rates from diverticular disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B397. EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE LA ENFERMEDAD DIVERTICULAR: TASAS CRECIENTES DE MORTALIDAD POR ENFERMEDAD DIVERTICULAR EN LOS PAÍSES EN DESARROLLO: La incidencia de la enfermedad diverticular está creciendo en el mundo occidental. Sin embargo, la carga mundial de la enfermedad es desconocida en el mundo en desarrollo.Determinar la carga global de la enfermedad diverticular medida por la mortalidad específica de la enfermedad mientras se identifican los indicadores de aumento de las tasas de enfermedad.Realizamos un análisis ecológico basado en datos de la Base de datos de mortalidad de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Luego, analizamos las tasas globales de mortalidad ajustadas por edad por enfermedad diverticular y las comparamos con las tasas nacionales de adultos con sobrepeso, gastos de salud y composición dietética.Datos nacionales de estadísticas vitales.Muertes por enfermedades diverticulares desde el 1 de enero de 1994 hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2016.Tasa nacional de mortalidad ajustada por edad.La tasa promedio de mortalidad ajustada por edad para la enfermedad diverticular fue de 0,51 ± 0,31 / 100,000 con un rango de 0,11 a 1,75 / 100,000. Durante el período de estudio, notamos que el 57% de las naciones tenían tasas crecientes de mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares, mientras que solo el 7% tenían tasas decrecientes. Las naciones más desarrolladas (40%) que las naciones en desarrollo (24%) se clasificaron como que tienen una alta carga de mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular durante el período de tiempo del estudio, y las naciones desarrolladas tuvieron porcentajes más altos de adultos con sobrepeso (58.9 ± 3.1%) que las naciones en desarrollo (50,6 ± 6,7%) (p <0,0001). Sin embargo, las naciones en desarrollo revelaron aumentos más rápidos en la mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares (0.027 ± 0.024 / 100,000 por año) que las naciones desarrolladas (0.005 ± 0.025 / 100,000 por año) (p = 0.001), así como proporciones de adultos con sobrepeso en expansión más rápida (0.76 ± 0.12% por año) que en las naciones ya desarrolladas (0.53 ± 0.10% por año) (p <0.0001).Los estudios ecológicos no pueden definir causa y efecto.Existe una considerable variabilidad en la mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular en todo el mundo. Los países en desarrollo se caracterizaron por un rápido aumento en la mortalidad por enfermedades diverticulares y porcentajes crecientes de adultos con sobrepeso. Se necesitan intervenciones de salud pública en los países en desarrollo para alterar las tasas de mortalidad por enfermedad diverticular. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B397.

Background: Diverticulitis is separated into complicated and uncomplicated, based on the patient's presentation at the time of his or her initial attack of acute diverticulitis., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for persistent complex diverticulitis, defined as an abscess, fistula, or stricture, at the time of elective surgery, and to characterize outcomes in this patient population., Design: This was a retrospective review of 2010 to 2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database., Settings: Individuals diagnosed with diverticulitis who underwent elective surgery were included., Patients: A total of 1502 patients underwent elective surgery for diverticulitis, of which 559 (37%) patients had a surgical indication of persistent complex diverticulitis., Interventions: We performed logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for complex diverticulitis and evaluated a new prediction model., Main Outcome Measures: The predictive factors of persistent complex diverticulitis for elective colon resection were measured., Results: The patients with complex diverticulitis were older (p < 0.001), had worse functional status (p < 0.001), more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and hypertension), and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.7 vs 1.6, p < 0.001). They were more likely to have a history of tobacco or alcohol use (p < 0.001) and to be malnourished. Interestingly, patients found to have persistent complex diverticulitis did not have more episodes than patients with uncomplicated cases did (p = 0.67). Surgical time was longer in complex diverticulitis, and the patients were more likely to require diverting stomas and concurrent resections of adjacent structures. The area under the curve from the test set was (0.75; 95% CI, 0.72-0.78), sensitivity and specificity were 0.890 (95% CI, 0.870-0.891) and 0.450 (95% CI, 0.410-0.490)., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective review and observational bias., Conclusions: Patients undergoing elective surgery for complex diverticulitis did not have more episodes. Instead, complex diverticulitis may be a reflection of a complicated patient, suggesting that complicated patients should have a different algorithm of care at the time of their initial presentation with diverticulitis to prevent the development of complex disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B183. ¿PODEMOS PREDECIR DIVERTICULITIS QUIRÚRGICAMENTE COMPLEJA EN CASOS ELECTIVOS?: La diverticulitis se divide en complicada y sin complicaciones, según la presentación del paciente en el momento de su ataque inicial de diverticulitis aguda.El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar los factores de riesgo para la diverticulitis compleja persistente, definida como un absceso, fístula o estenosis, en el momento de la cirugía electiva, y caracterizar los resultados en esta población de pacientes.Esta fue una revisión retrospectiva del 2010-2016 en la base de datos del Proyecto de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica Nacional del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos.Se incluyeron individuos diagnosticados con diverticulitis que se sometieron a cirugía electiva.1502 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía electiva por diverticulitis, de los cuales 559 (37%) pacientes tenían una indicación quirúrgica de diverticulitis compleja persistente.Realizamos un análisis de regresión logística para identificar los factores de riesgo de diverticulitis compleja y evaluamos un nuevo modelo de predicción.Se midieron los factores predictivos de diverticulitis compleja persistente para la resección de colon electiva.Los pacientes con diverticulitis compleja eran mayores (p <0,001), tenían un peor estado funcional (p <0,001), más comorbilidades (diabetes e hipertensión) y un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más alto (2,7 frente a 1,6, p <0,001). Tenían más probabilidades de tener antecedentes de consumo de tabaco o alcohol (p <0.001) y estar desnutridos. Curiosamente, los pacientes con diverticulitis compleja persistente no tuvieron más episodios que los pacientes sin complicaciones (p = 0,67). El tiempo quirúrgico fue más largo en la diverticulitis compleja y era más probable que requirieran estomas para desvio y resecciones concurrentes de estructuras adyacentes. El área bajo la curva de prueba fue (0.75, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.72-0.78), la sensibilidad y la especificidad fueron 0.890 (intervalo de confianza del 95%; 0.870-0.891) y 0.450 (intervalo de confianza del 95%; 0.410-0.490), respectivamente.El estudio estuvo limitado por su revisión retrospectiva y sesgo observacional.Los pacientes sometidos a cirugía electiva por diverticulitis compleja no tuvieron más episodios. En cambio, la diverticulitis compleja puede ser un reflejo de un paciente complicado, lo que sugiere que los pacientes complicados deben tener un algoritmo de atención diferente al momento de su presentación inicial con diverticulitis para prevenir el desarrollo de una enfermedad compleja. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B183. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Kahlil).

Background: Current guidelines accept partial colectomy and primary anastomosis with proximal diversion for select patients with perforated diverticulitis based on low-quality evidence., Objective: This study aimed to compare the effect of operative approach and surgeon training on outcomes following urgent/emergent colectomy for diverticulitis., Design: This is a statewide retrospective cohort study., Setting: Data were obtained from the New York State all-payer sample from 2000 to 2014., Patients: All patients who underwent an urgent/emergent sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis with creation of an end colostomy or primary anastomosis with proximal diversion were included. We excluded all patients age <18 years, with IBD, colorectal cancer, ischemic colitis, or elective operations., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcomes measured were postoperative in-hospital mortality and complications, RESULTS:: A total of 10,780 patients underwent urgent/emergent colectomy for diverticulitis: 10,600 (98.3%) received a Hartmann procedure and 180 (1.7%) received primary anastomosis with proximal diversion. Colorectal surgeons performed 6.0% of all operations. Utilization of primary anastomosis with proximal diversion was greater among colorectal surgeons but remained low overall (4.2% vs 1.5%; p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was 2-fold greater when noncolorectal surgeons performed primary anastomosis vs Hartmann procedure (15% vs 7.4%; p < 0.001) and 1.4 times greater among noncolorectal surgeons than among colorectal surgeons (7.5% vs 5.3%; p = 0.04). On multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for patient demographics/characteristics, year, hospital academic status, and surgeon training) primary anastomosis with proximal diversion remained associated with increased mortality (OR, 2.7; 95% CI,1.7-4.4; p < 0.001), complications (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; p < 0.001), and reoperation (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.8-6.3; p < 0.001), whereas colorectal board certification was associated with decreased mortality (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; p = 0.03)., Limitations: Selection bias secondary to retrospective nature and absence of disease severity were limitations of this study., Conclusions: Despite current recommendations for primary anastomosis with proximal diversion for perforated diverticulitis, this operation in New York State was associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality when performed by general surgeons. Given that the majority of urgent/emergent colectomies for diverticulitis are not performed by colorectal surgeons, guidelines for operative management of perforated diverticulitis should be reevaluated. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A772.

Background: Many patients with fecal incontinence report coexisting constipation. This subset of patients has not been well characterized or understood., Objective: The purpose of this study was to report the frequency of fecal incontinence with concurrent constipation and to compare quality-of-life outcomes of patients with fecal incontinence with and without constipation., Design: This was a prospective cohort study. Survey data, including Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Constipation Severity Instrument, Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life survey (categorized as lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Inventory and Urinary Distress Inventory surveys, and anorectal physiology testing were obtained., Settings: The study was conducted as a single-institution study from January 2007 to January 2017., Patients: Study patients had fecal incontinence presented to a tertiary pelvic floor center., Main Outcome Measures: Quality-of-life survey findings were measured., Results: A total of 946 patients with fecal incontinence were identified, and 656 (69.3%) had coexisting constipation. Patients with fecal incontinence with constipation were less likely to report a history of pregnancy (89.2% vs 91.4%; p = 0.001) or complicated delivery, such as requiring instrumentation (9.1% vs 18.1%; p = 0.005), when compared with patients with isolated fecal incontinence. Patients with fecal incontinence with constipation had higher rates of coexisting pelvic organ prolapse (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Inventory: 18.4 vs 8.2; p < 0.01), higher rates of urinary incontinence (Urinary Distress Inventory: 30.2 vs 23.4; p = 0.01), and higher pressure findings on manometry; intussusception on defecography was common. Patients with fecal incontinence with concurrent constipation had less severe incontinence scores at presentation (21.0 vs 23.8; p < 0.001) and yet lower overall health satisfaction (28.9% vs 42.5%; p < 0.001). Quality-of-life scores declined as constipation severity increased for lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment., Limitations: This was a single-institution study, and surgeon preference could bias population and anorectal physiology testing., Conclusions: Patients with fecal incontinence with concurrent constipation represent a different disease phenotype and have different clinical and anorectal physiology test findings and worse overall quality of life. Treatment of these patients requires careful consideration of prolapse pathology with coordinated treatment of coexisting disorders. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A783.

Background: Previous studies suggest that urgent colectomy and primary anastomosis with diversion is safe for perforated diverticulitis. Current guidelines support this approach., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the use of urgent or emergent primary anastomosis with diversion in diverticulitis before the 2014 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons guidelines and compare national outcomes of primary anastomosis with diversion to the Hartmann procedure., Design: This was a national retrospective cohort study., Settings: The study was conducted with a national all-payer US sample from 1998 to 2011., Patients: Patients included those admitted and treated with urgent or emergent colectomy for diverticulitis. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, concurrent diagnosis of colorectal cancer or IBD, no fecal diversion performed, and operations >24 hours after admission., Main Outcome Measures: In-hospital mortality was measured., Results: A total of 124,198 patients underwent emergent or urgent colectomy for acute diverticulitis; 67,721 underwent concurrent fecal diversion, including 65,084 (96.1%) who underwent end colostomy and 2637 (3.9%) who underwent anastomosis with ileostomy. The rate of primary anastomosis with diverting ileostomy increased from 30 to 60 diverting ileostomy cases per 1000 operative diverticulitis cases in 1998 versus 2011 (incidence rate ratio = 2.04 (95% CI, 1.70-2.50). However, overall use remained low, with >90% of patients undergoing end colostomy. Complication rates were higher (32.1% vs 23.3%; p < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality rates were higher (16.0% vs 6.4%; p < 0.001) for primary anastomosis with diversion patients compared with end colostomy. These findings were consistent on multivariable logistic regression. Other factors that contributed to in-hospital mortality included increasing age, increasing comorbid disease burden, and socioeconomic status., Limitations: Billing data can be inaccurate or biased because of nonmedically trained professional data entry. Selection bias could have affected the results of this retrospective study., Conclusions: The use of primary anastomosis with proximal diversion for urgent colectomy in diverticulitis increased over our study period; however, overall use remained low. Poor national outcomes after primary anastomosis with proximal diversion might affect compliance with new guidelines. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A600.

Background: Two systems measure surgical site infection rates following colorectal surgeries: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Healthcare Safety Network. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services pay-for-performance initiatives use National Healthcare Safety Network data for hospital comparisons., Objective: This study aimed to compare database concordance., Design: This is a multi-institution cohort study of systemwide Colorectal Surgery Collaborative. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program requires rigorous, standardized data capture techniques; National Healthcare Safety Network allows 5 data capture techniques. Standardized surgical site infection rates were compared between databases. The Cohen κ-coefficient was calculated., Setting: This study was conducted at Boston-area hospitals., Patients: National Healthcare Safety Network or National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patients undergoing colorectal surgery were included., Main Outcome Measures: Standardized surgical site infection rates were the primary outcomes of interest., Results: Thirty-day surgical site infection rates of 3547 (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) vs 5179 (National Healthcare Safety Network) colorectal procedures (2012-2014). Discrepancies appeared: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database of hospital 1 (N = 1480 patients) routinely found surgical site infection rates of approximately 10%, routinely deemed rate "exemplary" or "as expected" (100%). National Healthcare Safety Network data from the same hospital and time period (N = 1881) revealed a similar overall surgical site infection rate (10%), but standardized rates were deemed "worse than national average" 80% of the time. Overall, hospitals using less rigorous capture methods had improved surgical site infection rates for National Healthcare Safety Network compared with standardized National Surgical Quality Improvement Program reports. The correlation coefficient between standardized infection rates was 0.03 (p = 0.88). During 25 site-time period observations, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and National Healthcare Safety Network data matched for 52% of observations (13/25). κ = 0.10 (95% CI, -0.1366 to 0.3402; p = 0.403), indicating poor agreement., Limitations: This study investigated hospitals located in the Northeastern United States only., Conclusions: Variation in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-mandated National Healthcare Safety Network infection surveillance methodology leads to unreliable results, which is apparent when these results are compared with standardized data. High-quality data would improve care quality and compare outcomes among institutions.

Background: A theory of rectal intussusception has been advanced that intrarectal intussusception, intra-anal intussusception, and external rectal prolapse are points on a continuum and are a cause of fecal incontinence and constipation., Objective: This study evaluates the association among rectal intussusception, constipation, fecal incontinence, and anorectal manometry., Design: Patients undergoing defecography were studied from a prospectively maintained database and classified according to the Oxford Rectal Prolapse Grade as normal or having intra-rectal, intra-anal, or external intussusception. Patient symptoms were assessed using the Constipation Severity Index and the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Quality-of-life surveys were also used. Patients also underwent anorectal manometry., Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary care university medical center (Massachusetts General Hospital)., Patients: The study included 147 consecutive patients undergoing evaluation for evacuatory dysfunction and involved defecography, symptoms questionnaires, and anorectal physiology testing from January 2011 to December 2013., Main Outcome Measures: Symptom severity and quality-of-life scores were measured, as well as anal manometry results., Results: Increasing Oxford grade was associated with an increase in severity of fecal incontinence (median score: normal = 23.9, intrarectal = 21.0, intra-anal = 30.0, external prolapse = 35.3; β = 4.71; p = 0.009), which persisted in a multivariable model including age (β = 2.13; p = 0.03), and decreased sphincter pressures (median mean resting pressure: normal = 75.4, intra-rectal = 69.7, intra-anal = 64.3, external prolapse = 48.3; β = -8.57; p = 0.003), which did not persist in a multivariable model. Constipation severity did not increase with rising intussusception (mean score: normal = 37.4, intrarectal = 35.0, intra-anal = 41.4, external prolapse = 32.9; p = 0.79), and balloon expulsion improved rather than worsened (normal = 47.1%, intrarectal = 60.5%, intra-anal = 82.9%, external prolapse = 93.1%; p < 0.001)., Limitations: The study was limited because it was an observational study from a single center., Conclusions: Increasing grades of rectal intussusception are associated with increasing fecal incontinence but not constipation.

Background: The association between an objective measure of fecal incontinence severity and patient-reported quality of life is poorly understood., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients with various degrees of fecal incontinence to determine whether their quality of life as measured by the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale is affected by coexisting pelvic floor disorders., Design: This was a prospective, survey-based study., Settings: The study was conducted at a tertiary pelvic floor disorders center., Patients: Included patients were all of those presenting between January 2007 and March 2014., Main Outcome Measures: Survey data were analyzed to determine the association between Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, as well as scores from the Constipation Severity Instrument, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Organ Distress Inventory, and Urinary Distress Inventory., Results: A total of 585 patients reported fecal incontinence ranging from none (n = 191) to mild/moderate (n = 159) to severe (n = 235). As expected, patients with severe fecal incontinence have worse scores on all fecal incontinence quality-of-life subscales (lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment) and worse colorectal/anal symptoms than those with mild/moderate or no fecal incontinence (p < 0.0001). Patients with severe fecal incontinence also have worse bladder/urinary symptoms (p ≤ 0.0001). Pelvic organ prolapse and constipation symptoms were similar between groups (p ≥ 0.61). After correcting for baseline differences in patient comorbidities and bladder/urinary symptoms, a significant association persisted between Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and all of the subscales of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life instrument (p < 0.0001). However, urinary distress scores also remained significantly associated with all of the fecal incontinence quality-of-life subscales except for embarrassment after risk adjustment (p < 0.01)., Limitations: Nongeneral population and a lack of patient data on previous medical management of fecal incontinence were limitations of this study., Conclusions: The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale correlates strongly with instruments measuring both fecal and urinary incontinence. This underscores the importance of quantifying the presence or absence of coexistent urinary leakage in studies where a drop in fecal incontinence quality of life is considered a primary end point.

Background: There are various surgical techniques used treat anal fistulas. The adoption and success rates of newer techniques have not been clearly established., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the healing rate after operations for anal fistulas in New England colorectal surgery practices., Design: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database., Settings: The study was conducted at colorectal surgery practices in New England., Patients: A prospective, multicenter registry was created by the New England Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Surgeons were invited to collect data prospectively regarding patients operated on for anal fistulas between January 1, 2011, and August 1, 2013. Fistula classification, surgical intervention, continence scores, and healing were determined by the treating surgeon., Intervention: Operation for anal fistula was performed., Main Outcome Measures: We measured the proportion of patients with healed fistulas at 3 months., Results: Sixteen surgeons submitted data regarding 240 operations for fistula with curative intent. Mean patient age was 45 ± 14 years. A total of 158 patients (66%) were men, and 110 (46%) had undergone an anorectal operation. Twenty-nine (12%) had Crohn's disease. The healing rates of fistulotomy, advancement flap, and fistula plugs at 3 months were 94% (95% CI, 89-97), 60% (95% CI, 33-77), and 20% (95% CI, 5-50). The healing rate of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure at 3 months was 79% (95% CI, 65-88). Hospital site was the only variable associated with healing (p < 0.05). Hospitals that performed more ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedures had higher healing rates at 3 months (p < 0.0001)., Limitations: This study was limited by selection bias and reporting bias., Conclusions: A wide variety of techniques are used to treat anal fistulas in our region. Fistulotomy continues to have excellent results. There has been enthusiastic early adoption of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract technique. Early healing rates after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure appear to be excellent.

Background: Abdominoperineal resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma is a common procedure with high morbidity, including perineal wound complications., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for perineal wound dehiscence and to investigate the effect of wound dehiscence on survival., Design: This was a retrospective medical chart review., Settings: The study was conducted in a tertiary care university medical center., Patients: Patients included in the study were those with low rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent abdominoperineal resection between January 2001 and June 2012., Main Outcomes Measures: We assessed the incidence of perineal wound dehiscence, as well as survival, after surgery., Results: A total of 249 patients underwent abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma. The mean age was 62.6 years (range, 23.0-98.0 years), 159 (63.8%) were male, and the mean BMI was 27.9 (range, 16.7-58.5). There were 153 patients (61.1%) who survived for 5 years after surgery. Sixty-nine patients (27.7%) developed wound dehiscence. Multivariable analysis revealed the following associations with dehiscence: BMI (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15; p = 0.002), IBD (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.4-32.5; p = 0.02), history of other malignant neoplasm (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.6), and abdominoperineal resection for cancer recurrence (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.3; p = 0.01). In the survival analysis, wound dehiscence was associated with decreased survival (mean survival time for dehiscence vs no dehiscence, 66.6 months vs 76.6 months; p = 0.01). This relationship persisted in the multivariable analysis (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8; p = 0.02)., Limitations: This was a retrospective, observational study from a single center., Conclusions: The adjusted risk of death was 1.7 times higher in patients who experienced dehiscence than in those who did not. Attention to perineal wound closure with consideration of flap creation should at least be given to patients with a history of malignant neoplasm, those with IBD, those with rectal cancer recurrence, and women undergoing posterior vaginectomy. Preoperative weight loss should also reduce dehiscence risk.

Background: Bowel function following surgery for diverticulitis has not previously been systematically described., Objective: This study aimed to document the frequency, severity, and predictors of suboptimal bowel function in patients who have undergone sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis., Design: This study is a retrospective analysis., Setting: This study was conducted at a large, academic medical center., Patients: Three hundred twenty-five patients who underwent laparoscopic or open sigmoid colectomy with restoration of intestinal continuity for diverticulitis were included in the study population. Of these, 249 patients (76.6%) returned a 70-question survey incorporating the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and the Memorial Bowel Function Instrument., Main Outcome Measures: Survey responders and nonresponders were compared with the use of χ and t tests. Responders with suboptimal bowel function (fecal incontinence, urgency and/or incomplete emptying) were then compared with those with good outcomes by the use of logistic regression analysis to determine the predictors of poor function., Results: Of the responders, 24.8% reported clinically relevant fecal incontinence (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index ≥ 24), 19.6% reported fecal urgency (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Urgency Subscale ≥ 4), and 20.8% reported incomplete emptying (Memorial Bowel Function Instrument Emptying Subscale ≥ 4). On logistic regression analysis, fecal incontinence was predicted by female sex (OR = 2.3, p = 0.008) and the presence of a preoperative abscess (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05). Fecal urgency was associated with female sex (OR = 1.3, p < 0.05) and a diverting ileostomy (OR = 2.1, p < 0.001). Incomplete emptying was associated with female sex (OR = 1.4, p < 0.05) and postoperative sepsis (OR = 1.9, p < 0.05)., Limitations: This study was limited by the fact that we did not use a nondiverticulitis control group and we had limited preoperative data on the history of bowel impairment symptoms., Conclusion: One-fifth of patients reported fecal urgency, fecal incontinence, or incomplete emptying after surgery for diverticulitis. Despite the limitations of our study, these results are concerning and should be investigated further prospectively.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreases total lymph nodes harvested and possibly affects lymph node staging after total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer., Objective: This study aimed to compare staging by lymph node ratio with staging by absolute number of positive lymph nodes., Design: This study is a retrospective cohort review., Setting: : A tertiary care referral center was the setting for this investigation., Patients: A total of 281 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision after histologically confirmed rectal cancer between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2008 were included in this study., Main Outcome Measures: Lymph node ratio is the number of positive lymph nodes divided by the total number of lymph nodes within one sample. Risk categories of low (0 to < 0.09); medium (0.09 to < 0.36); and high (≥ 0.36) for lymph node ratio were chosen by significance with the use of Cox proportional hazards models. These categories were then used in a reclassification table and compared with positive lymph node stage: low (0 positive nodes), medium (1-3 nodes), and high (> 3) by 5-year mortality rates., Results: The majority (87%) of patients were concordant in risk assessment. Thirty patients were downstaged to lower risk lymph node ratio categories without showing actual lower mortality rates. Seven patients were upstaged to a high-risk lymph node ratio category with a supporting higher 5-year mortality rate. When limiting the analysis to those with fewer than 12 nodes, 136 (95%) patients were concordant in risk assessment; all 30 incorrectly downstaged patients were removed, but the 7 correctly upstaged patients remained., Conclusions: Patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation before rectal cancer surgery frequently have fewer than 12 lymph nodes harvested despite maintaining vigorous surgical standards. Lymph node ratios may provide excellent prognostic value and are possibly a better independent staging method than absolute positive lymph node counts when less than 12 lymph nodes are harvested after neoadjuvant treatment.

Purpose: Failure to expel a 60-mL balloon on manometry and abnormal relaxation of anal sphincter on electromyographic testing are frequently used to diagnose pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, the relationship between these 2 test results and their relationship to defecography is poorly characterized. We aimed to describe this relationship and create a predictive model for pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography., Methods: From March 2008 to April 2010 consecutive patients with symptoms suggestive of functional constipation were evaluated at our Pelvic Floor Disorders Center 125 and the results of their workups were collected prospectively. Sixty-three patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography were compared with 60 patients without dyssynergia in terms of manometry pressures, electromyographic text results, and balloon expulsion testing results (χ, t tests)., Results: Of 125 patients meeting Rome II symptom criteria for constipation, 123 patients underwent defecography and, of these, 63 (51.2%) had evidence of pelvic floor dyssynergia. Patients with and without dyssynergia had a slight difference in mean resting pressures (62.8 mmHg vs 49.5 mmHg, P = .02) and no discernable differences in rectal sensitivity and compliance: first sensation (56.5 vs 62.5, P = .34) and maximum tolerated volume (164.2 vs 191.2, P = .09). It appeared that abnormalities in electromyographic relaxation and balloon expulsion occurred in the same patients: 84.1% of patients with abnormal electromyographic results also did not expel the balloon. However, the presence of these abnormalities, in isolation or together, did not predict the presence of dyssynergia on defecography., Conclusion: Normal electromyographic results or the ability to expel a 60-mL balloon does not exclude the presence of pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography. It is unclear which of these 3 tests should be used to guide the recommendation for (and to then measure response to) biofeedback.

Introduction: We describe the relationship between anorectal manometry, fecal incontinence severity, and findings at endoanal ultrasound., Methods: A total of 351 women completed the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, underwent anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound. Severity index and manometry pressures in 203 women with intact sphincters on ultrasound were compared with pressures in 148 women with sphincter defects. Relationships between resting and squeeze pressures, severity index, and size of sphincter defects were evaluated., Results: Mean severity index in patients with and without sphincter defect was 35.7 vs. 36.7 (not significant). Worsening index correlated with worsening mean and maximum resting pressure (P < 0.0001). Differences were observed in mean and maximum resting pressure between the patients with and without sphincter defects (26.6 vs. 37.2, P < 0.0001; 39.4 vs. 51.7, P < 0.001). Resting pressures correlated with the sizes of defect (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients with and without sphincter defects had similar severity scores, but patients with defects had a significant decrease in resting pressures. Patients with larger sphincter defects had lower severity scores and resting pressures. Until a manometry cutoff can be set to discriminate between absence and presence of defects, both manometry and ultrasound should be offered to patients with history of anal trauma.