1. Differential activity in Heschl's gyrus between deaf and hearing individuals is due to auditory deprivation rather than language modality
- Author
-
Rebecca Smittenaar, Cheryl M. Capek, Bencie Woll, Velia Cardin, Jerker Rönnberg, Mary Rudner, and Eleni Orfanidou
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,Auditory area ,Sensory system ,Audiology ,Sign language ,Deafness ,Auditory cortex ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Sign Language ,0302 clinical medicine ,Neuroplasticity ,medicine ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,Humans ,Speech ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Sensory deprivation ,Auditory Cortex ,Brain Mapping ,Neuronal Plasticity ,Crossmodal ,Echo-Planar Imaging ,05 social sciences ,fMRI ,Neurosciences ,Linguistics ,Middle Aged ,Cross modal plasticity ,Neurology ,Heschl's gyrus ,Female ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Neurovetenskaper - Abstract
Sensory cortices undergo crossmodal reorganisation as a consequence of sensory deprivation. Congenital deafness in humans represents a particular case with respect to other types of sensory deprivation, because cortical reorganisation is not only a consequence of auditory deprivation, but also of language-driven mechanisms. Visual crossmodal plasticity has been found in secondary auditory cortices of deaf individuals, but it is still unclear if reorganisation also takes place in primary auditory areas, and how this relates to language modality and auditory deprivation. Here, we dissociated the effects of language modality and auditory deprivation on crossmodal plasticity in Heschl's gyrus as a whole, and in cytoarchitectonic region Te1.0 (likely to contain the core auditory cortex). Using fMRI, we measured the BOLD response to viewing sign language in congenitally or early deaf individuals with and without sign language knowledge, and in hearing controls. Results show that differences between hearing and deaf individuals are due to a reduction in activation caused by visual stimulation in the hearing group, which is more significant in Te1.0 than in Heschl's gyrus as a whole. Furthermore, differences between deaf and hearing groups are due to auditory deprivation, and there is no evidence that the modality of language used by deaf individuals contributes to crossmodal plasticity in Heschl's gyrus. Funding agencies: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond [P2008-0481:1-E]; Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research [2008-0846]; Swedish Research Council [349-2007-8654]; Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain [RES-620-28-6001, RES-620-28-0002]
- Published
- 2016