Search

Objective: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distri-butions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.Methods: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TEC-OFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.Results: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT dis-tributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, >= 95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.Conclusion: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs. Gabrielle Froeuroberg, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:758 (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access artic, Funding Agencies|Stockholm Region; Karolinska Institute clinical research grant; Mukoviszidose Institut gGmbH, Bonn; German Cystic Fibrosis Association Mukoviszidose e.V; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; Swedish research council; Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse

Objective: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distri-butions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.Methods: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TEC-OFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.Results: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT dis-tributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, >= 95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.Conclusion: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs. Gabrielle Froeuroberg, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:758 (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access artic, Funding Agencies|Stockholm Region; Karolinska Institute clinical research grant; Mukoviszidose Institut gGmbH, Bonn; German Cystic Fibrosis Association Mukoviszidose e.V; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; Swedish research council; Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse

Objective: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distri-butions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.Methods: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TEC-OFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.Results: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT dis-tributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, >= 95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.Conclusion: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs. Gabrielle Froeuroberg, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:758 (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access artic, Funding Agencies|Stockholm Region; Karolinska Institute clinical research grant; Mukoviszidose Institut gGmbH, Bonn; German Cystic Fibrosis Association Mukoviszidose e.V; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; Swedish research council; Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse

Objective: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distri-butions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.Methods: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TEC-OFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.Results: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT dis-tributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, >= 95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.Conclusion: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs. Gabrielle Froeuroberg, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:758 (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access artic, Funding Agencies|Stockholm Region; Karolinska Institute clinical research grant; Mukoviszidose Institut gGmbH, Bonn; German Cystic Fibrosis Association Mukoviszidose e.V; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; Swedish research council; Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse

Objective: For non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distri-butions of wild-type isolates have not been systematically evaluated despite their importance for establishing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) breakpoints.Methods: We gathered MIC distributions for drugs used against the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) obtained by commercial broth microdilution (SLOMYCOI and RAPMYCOI) from 12 laboratories. Epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) and tentative ECOFFs (TEC-OFFs) were determined by EUCAST methodology including quality control (QC) strains.Results: The clarithromycin ECOFF was 16 mg/L for M. avium (n = 1271) whereas TECOFFs were 8 mg/L for M. intracellulare (n = 415) and 1 mg/L for MAB (n = 1014) confirmed by analysing MAB subspecies without inducible macrolide resistance (n = 235). For amikacin, the ECOFFs were 64 mg/L for MAC and MAB. For moxifloxacin, the WT spanned >8 mg/L for both MAC and MAB. For linezolid, the ECOFF and TECOFF were 64 mg/L for M. avium and M. intracellulare, respectively. Current CLSI breakpoints for amikacin (16 mg/L), moxifloxacin (1 mg/L) and linezolid (8 mg/L) divided the corresponding WT dis-tributions. For QC M. avium and M. peregrinum, >= 95% of MIC values were well within recommended QC ranges.Conclusion: As a first step towards clinical breakpoints for NTM, (T)ECOFFs were defined for several antimicrobials against MAC and MAB. Broad wild-type MIC distributions indicate a need for further method refinement which is now under development within the EUCAST subcommittee for anti-mycobacterial drug susceptibility testing. In addition, we showed that several CLSI NTM breakpoints are not consistent in relation to the (T)ECOFFs. Gabrielle Froeuroberg, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:758 (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. This is an open access artic, Funding Agencies|Stockholm Region; Karolinska Institute clinical research grant; Mukoviszidose Institut gGmbH, Bonn; German Cystic Fibrosis Association Mukoviszidose e.V; Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation; Swedish research council; Swiss Innovation Agency Innosuisse