Search

Abstract Background The eRegistry for maternal and child health is an electronic registry system developed for the collection, analysis, retrieval, storage, and dissemination of information on health determinants and outcomes for women and children. The purpose of the eRegistry is to improve health-care provision and public health surveillance in the occupied Palestinian territory. Given the highly sensitive nature of reproductive health information, however, careful attention to ethical and legal considerations is essential. The aim of this study was to map the legal, regulatory, and ethical landscape using a situation analysis tool tailored for the Palestinian context and to identify gaps, opportunities, and actions necessary to ensure an ethical and lawful framework for an eRegistry. Methods We used an exploratory situation analysis tool (SAT) to map the current legislative, regulatory, and governance environment in the occupied Palestinian territory. The primary objective was to assess, document, and analyse the legal and ethical landscape. Specific focal topics addressed by the SAT included identifying relevant legislation (eg, civil registration, data privacy, health registries, public health law), existing governance structures, accountability, and oversight bodies (ie, ethical review committees, data protection authorities), and data quality and security policies. The Palestinian National Institute of Public Health (PNIPH) completed the SAT and held workshops for relevant stakeholders, including staff from the ministry of health's legal affairs department, PNIPH staff, and other legal experts. No ethical approval was required because data were collected from public documents. Findings The findings from the SAT reflect the current situation in the occupied Palestinian territory with respect to existing laws, accountability and oversight bodies, and data collection protocols and policies concerning data privacy and security. Existing Palestinian legislation relevant to health registries includes Article 4 of the General Statistics Law (2000), which honours data confidentiality and the privacy of individuals. The Penal Law number 16 of 1960 addresses the disclosure of confidential information, whereas Article 355 specifically states that disclosure of official confidential information to unauthorised persons is unlawful and could result in imprisonment. Furthermore, the Public Health Law (2004) addresses general maternal and child health issues in Articles 4 and 5. We investigated relevant oversight and accountability bodies (eg, ethical review board) that might be relevant to an electronic maternal and child health registry. Finally, in a review of existing data privacy protocols and policies, we noted that few formal protocols (ie, privacy manual) or policies regulate data collection and access practices. Interpretation Specific areas within the legal and regulatory framework of the occupied Palestinian territory could be strengthened. The eRegistry Governance Guidance Toolkit, predicated on the SAT content, outlines responsible data stewardship practices and provides assistance in developing protocols and policies in lieu of specific laws by providing a framework to ensure the protection of women and children's privacy. Effective governance that protects women and children's privacy and confidentiality is essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring the long-term success of an eRegistry. Funding European Research Council and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Estimated dates of delivery have important consequences for clinical decisions during pregnancy and labour. The Electronic Maternal and Child Health Registry (MCH eRegistry) in Palestine includes antenatal care data and birth data from hospitals. Our objective was to compare computed best estimates of gestational age in the MCH eRegistry with the gestational ages recorded by health-care providers in hospital delivery units.Methods: We obtained data for pregnant women in the West Bank registered in the MCH eRegistry from Jan 1, 2017 to March 31, 2017. Best estimates of gestational age in the registry are automated and based on a standard pregnancy duration of 280 days and ultrasound-based pregnancy dating before 20 weeks' gestation or the woman's last menstrual period date. Hospital recorded gestational ages are reported by care providers in delivery units and are rounded to the nearest week. We calculated proportions of gestational ages (with 95% CIs) from both sources that fell into the categories of term, very preterm (24-32 weeks' gestation), preterm (33-37 weeks), or post-term (>42 weeks).Findings: 1924 women were included in the study. The median hospital recorded gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 38-40 weeks) and according to MCH eRegistry estimates was 39 weeks and 5 days (IQR 38 weeks and 1 day to 40 weeks and 5 days). Proportions of very preterm, preterm, and post-term deliveries were higher based on MCH eRegistry estimates than on hospital recorded gestational ages (very preterm 3%, 95% CI 2-4 vs 2%, 1-2; preterm 6%, 5-7 vs 5%, 3-6 ; post-term 6%, 5-7 vs 1%, 1-2).Interpretation: In addition to clinical care, the proportions of term, very preterm, preterm, and post-term births can have implications for public health monitoring. The proportion of deliveries within the normal range of term gestation was calculated to be higher by care providers in delivery units than by MCH eRegistry estimates. Extending the access of hospitals to information from antenatal care in the MCH e-Registry could improve continuity of data and better care for pregnant women.Funding: European Research Council, Research Council of Norway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Targeted client communication using text messages can inform, motivate, and remind pregnant and postpartum women to use care in a timely way. The mixed results of previous studies of the effectiveness of targeted client communication highlight the importance of theory-based co-design with users. We planned, developed, and tested a theory-based intervention tailored to pregnant and postpartum women, to be automatically distributed via an electronic maternal and child health registry in occupied Palestinian territory.Methods: We did 26 in-depth interviews with pregnant women and health-care providers in seven purposively selected public primary health-care clinics in the West Bank and Gaza to include clinics with different profiles. An interview guide was developed using the Health Belief Model to explore women's perceptions of high-risk conditions (anaemia, hypertension, diabetes, and fetal growth restriction) and timely attendance for antenatal care, as predefined by a national expert panel. We did thematic analyses of the interview data. Based on the results, we composed messages for a targeted client communication intervention, applying concepts from the Model of Actionable Feedback, social nudging, and enhanced active choice. We assessed the acceptability and understandability of the messages through unstructured interviews with local health promotion experts, health-care providers, and pregnant women.Findings: The recurring themes indicated that most women were aware of the health consequences of anaemia, hypertension, and diabetes, but that they seldom associated these conditions with pregnancy. We identified knowledge gaps and low awareness of susceptibility to and severity of these complications and the benefits of timely antenatal care. The actionable messages were iteratively improved with stakeholder and end-user feedback after presenting the initial draft, and the messages deemed were understandable and acceptable based on reflections during unstructured assessment.Interpretation: Following a stepwise iterative process by a theory-based approach and co-designing the intervention with users, we revealed elements critical to an efficacious targeted client communication intervention. A potential limitation of our study is that conducting in-depth interviews on several health conditions simultaneously might have reduced the depth of information we could have obtained. The strength of our study was that we assessed for, developed, and refined the intervention following recommended theoretical frameworks and best practices. The effectiveness of this intervention is under evaluation in a cluster-randomised trial (ISRCTN10520687).Funding: European Research Council and Research Council of Norway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]