Search

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence, burden of refractive errors and their associated trend from 1990 to 2018 and geographic inequalities in Iran. Methods: Data regarding the epidemiology of refractive errors was extracted from three different sources: systematic review of published literature, data from visual school screening programs, and data from Iran's national health survey (NHS). The pool of all available data on refractive errors as well as demographic, location, and socioeconomic status covariates were fitted in spatio-temporal and Gaussian process regression models to predict the prevalence of refractive errors from the years 1990 to 2018 in 31 provinces grouped by age and sex in order to calculate years lived with disability (YLDs). Results: In 2018, the age-adjusted prevalence of refractive errors was 16.32% (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 12.44-21.48%) in both sexes, 17.98% (95% UI: 13.74-23.61%) in women, and 14.66% (95% UI: 11.14-19.36%) in men. The prevalence of refractive errors reveals that it increases with age. Refractive errors contributed to 441.41 and 348.38 YLDs in men and women, respectively. The age-standardized prevalence growth was 31.30% in females and 24.32% in males from the years 1990 to 2018. Significant geographical heterogeneity was observed. The agestandardized YLDs rates of refractive errors represent an increasing trend of 28.9% increase from 1990 to 2018. Conclusion: Over 28 years, the prevalence of refractive errors increased significantly. Women tend to have higher rates of prevalence. The prevalence increased in older ages. Border provinces had the lowest prevalence. Agestandardized YLDs rates of refractive errors increased by about 30%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the magnitude and causes of blindness and visual impairment (VI) in Kurdistan, using the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness methodology. Methods: In this population-based cross sectional study, 99 clusters were selected through probability proportional to size sampling. Visual acuity (VA) was measured using a standard tumbling "E" chart. Ophthalmologists examined participants with VA < 6/18 in both eyes. The cause of VI in the better eye or the most treatable cause was considered as the primary cause of VI. Results: A total of 3203 (response rate: 92.4%) individuals aged 50 years and older participated, of whom 1657 (51.7%) were female. The standardized prevalence of blindness, severe visual impairment (SVI), and moderate visual impairment (MVI) based on available correction (presenting VA) were 2.1% (1.5-2.6), 1.7% (1.2-2.2), and 9.6%(8.4-10.8), respectively. The proportion of avoidable causes of blindness, SVI, and MVI were 58.1%, 78.4%, and 83.4%, respectively. The most common cause of blindness and SVI was cataract (27.4% and 60.8% respectively), followed by age-related macular degeneration (25.8% and 13.7%, respectively). The leading causes of MVI were uncorrected refractive errors (RE) (37.2%) and cataract (33.6%). Conclusion: The prevalence of blindness in the study population seems comparable to the region. According to our results, blindness, SVI, and MVI were mostly due to avoidable causes. Cataract and refractive errors are the principal causes of blindness and VI in Kurdistan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the safety and outcome of single-piece posterior chamber intraocular lens (PC-IOL) implantation in the ciliary sulcus following posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery. Methods: Patients with posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery with a single-piece acrylic IOL implanted into the ciliary sulcus were studied. Complete ocular examinations were performed after 6 months postoperatively. Results: Twenty-four eyes were included. Mean follow-up duration was 8.33 ± 2.33 months. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometric cylinder or intraocular pressure. Visual acuity of 87.50% of patients was ≥20/40 after surgery. Complications included foveopathy (10 eyes), iris transillumination defect (4 eyes), iris chafing (2 eyes), pigmented keratic precipitate (KP) (4 eyes), clinical IOL tilt (6 eyes), endothelial pigment dusting (14 eyes), IOL pigment dusting (17 eyes), iris bowing (6 eyes), IOL decentration (4 eyes), and IOL tilt detected with ultrasonography biomicroscopy (UBM) (4 eyes). IOL pigment dusting was significantly higher in eyes with short axial lengths, high IOL power, small sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) diameter, large STS IOL diameter mismatch, and small anterior chamber depth and angle. Significant relationships were observed between pigmented KP with small STS diameter and large STS IOL diameter mismatch, UBM and clinical IOL tilt with large anterior chamber depth and between iris transillumination defect and STS IOL diameter mismatch. Conclusion: This implantation is associated with higher incidence of complications. Single-piece acrylic IOLs are not designed for sulcus implantation. However, they may be used in eyes with longer axial length if the 3-piece IOL is not available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]