Search

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (TS), occipitocervical inclination (OCI). K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. Methods: We evaluated 75B lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured x2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two hone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SEm was 1.8 degrees and MDC was 5.0 degrees for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.8B6. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervicalcervicai lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (TS), occipitocervical inclination (OCI). K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. Methods: We evaluated 75B lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured x2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two hone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SEm was 1.8 degrees and MDC was 5.0 degrees for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.8B6. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervicalcervicai lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (TS), occipitocervical inclination (OCI). K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. Methods: We evaluated 75B lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured x2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two hone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SEm was 1.8 degrees and MDC was 5.0 degrees for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.8B6. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervicalcervicai lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (TS), occipitocervical inclination (OCI). K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. Methods: We evaluated 75B lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured x2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two hone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SEm was 1.8 degrees and MDC was 5.0 degrees for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.8B6. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervicalcervicai lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

Study Design: This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Purpose: Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (TS), occipitocervical inclination (OCI). K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters. Overview of Literature: Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce. Methods: We evaluated 75B lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured x2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two hone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: SEm was 1.8 degrees and MDC was 5.0 degrees for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.8B6. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT. Conclusions: This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervicalcervicai lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).