Search

Individual variation in how animals react to stress and environmental change has become a central topic in a wide range of biological disciplines, from evolutionary ecology to biomedicine. Such variation manifests phenotypically as correlated trait-clusters (referred to as coping styles, behavioral syndromes, shyness-boldness, or personality traits). Thresholds for switching from active coping (fight-flight) to inhibition and passive behavior when exposed to stress depend on experience and genetic factors. Comparative research has revealed a range of neuroendocrine-behavioral associations which are conserved throughout the vertebrate subphylum, including factors affecting perception, learning, and memory of stimuli and events. Here we review conserved aspects of the contribution of neurogenesis and other aspects of neural plasticity to stress coping. In teleost fish, brain cell proliferation and neurogenesis have received recent attention. This work reveals that brain cell proliferation and neurogenesis are associated with heritable variation in stress coping style, and they are also differentially affected by short- and long-term stress in a biphasic manner. Routinedependent and inflexible behavior in proactive individuals is associated with limited neural plasticity. These evolutionarily conserved relationships hold the potential to illuminate the biological background for stress-related neurobiological disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Salmonid fishes such as the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are frequently used to study behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of socially induced stress. A predictable aggressive response to territorial intrusion, a well described neuroanatomy, and many essential similarities in the stress response in fishes and other vertebrates are among the advantages of this comparative model. One conspicuous difference when compared to mammals, however, is that in telost fish and other non-mammalian vertebrates, neurogenesis persists into adulthood to a much higher degree. Very little is known about the functional significance of individual differences in the rate of brain cell proliferation in fish, or whether structural changes in the fish brain are influenced by the social environment. In this paper we discuss the observation that brain cell proliferation is reduced in subordinate fish, focusing in particular on whether such individual variation reflects a difference in coping style or is indeed a response to social interactions. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]