Search

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks to predict large for gestational age (LGA) at term delivery according to 6 growth standards, including population, population-customized, and international references. The secondary objectives were to determine its predictive ability to detect adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) and whether the ultrasound-delivery interval influences the detection rate of LGA newborns.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 9,585 singleton pregnancies. Maternal clinical characteristics, fetal ultrasound data obtained at 35 weeks, and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were used to calculate EPWs to predict LGAs at delivery according to the customized and the non-customized (NC) Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH), the customized Figueras, the NC Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), the NC INTERGROWTH-21st, and the NC World Health Organization (WHO) standards.Results: For a 10% false-positive rate, detection rates for total LGAs at delivery ranged from 31.2% with the WHO (area under the curve [AUC] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.79) to 56.5% with the FMF standard (AUC 0.85; 95% CI, 0.84-0.86). Detection rates and values of AUCs to predict LGAs by ultrasound-delivery interval (range 1-6 weeks) show higher detection rates as the interval decreases. APO detection rates ranged from 2.5% with the WHO to 12.6% with the Figueras standard.Conclusion: The predictive ability of ultrasound estimated fetal weight at 35 weeks to detect LGA infants is significantly greater for FMF and MSUH NC standards. In contrast, the APO detection rate is significantly greater for customized standards. The shorter ultrasound-delivery interval relates to better prediction rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current practice in the UK is to plot premature infant anthropometric measurements on Neonatal and Infant Close Monitoring (NICM) reference charts. These charts have several known limitations. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project has recently produced international ante- and postnatal growth standards. Exact knowledge of growth centiles allows clinicians to accurately assess infant nutritional requirements. Objective: To compare target centile measurements between INTERGROWTH-21st and UK NICM growth charts for premature infants. Method: Anthropometric measurements (weight and head circumference) of a convenience sample of neonates born between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation were analysed retrospectively. Measurements were collected across three time points and plotted on both the NICM and INTERGROWTH-21st growth charts. The respective centiles were compared and analysed by paired-sample t test, Wilcoxon rank test analysis, and multilevel mixed-effect linear regression models. Results: Centiles for weight and head circumference measurements of 96 infants plotted on INTERGROWTH-21st charts were significantly greater than their corresponding UK charts at all three time points. For weight, the average difference between the two charts varied from 9.1 to 16.4 centiles. The difference between the two charts was greater for female than male infants by up to 6.9 centiles (95% CI 10.1–3.8). Conclusion: Existing UK NICM reference charts are significantly different to the growth standards of INTERGROWTH-21st. The choice of which growth chart to adopt in the UK could have important consequences on premature infants' future adult health and therefore requires further prospective observational studies with larger data sets including length measurements and more comprehensive population characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the predictive ability of the ultrasound estimated percentile weight (EPW) at 35 weeks of pregnancy to predict adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) at term delivery according to 5 fetal growth standards, including population, population-customized, and international references.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 9,585 singleton pregnancies. Maternal clinical characteristics, fetal ultrasound data obtained at 35 weeks and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were used to calculate EPWs to predict APOs according to: the customized and noncustomized (NC) Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH), the customized Figueras, the NC INTERGROWTH-21st, and the NC World Health Organization (WHO) international standards. APOs were defined as the occurrence of cesarean or instrumental delivery for nonreassuring fetal status, 5-min Apgar score < 7, arterial cord blood pH <7.10, or stillbirth. The predictive ability of EPW for APOs was analyzed using the area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivities were calculated for different false-positive rates (FPRs).Results: For a 10% FPR, detection rates for total APOs ranged between 12.7% with the customized MSUH (AUC 0.52; 95% CI 0.50-0.55) and 14.4% with the NC MSUH standard (AUC 0.55; 95% CI 0.53-0.57) for EPW by ultrasound; and from 22.0% with the customized MSUH standard (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.58-0.63) to 27.8% with the NC WHO (AUC 0.65; 95% CI 0.63-0.68) for EPW at delivery.Conclusions: The predictive capacity of the EPW for APOS is limited and similar, by both ultrasound and at delivery, for the 5 growth standards, without significant differences between customized and NC standards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population.Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neonates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, >35 weeks).Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic performance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89.Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]