Search

Background: Skin pain in atopic dermatitis (AD) increases with disease severity and is associated with substantial quality of life (QoL) burden. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate abrocitinib efficacy on skin pain and QoL in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: This post hoc analysis included data with abrocitinib administered as monotherapy (pooled phase 2b [NCT02780167] and phase 3 JADE MONO-1 [NCT03349060] and JADE MONO-2 [NCT03575871]) or in combination with topical therapy (phase 3 JADE COMPARE [NCT03720470] and JADE TEEN [NCT03796676]). Patients received oral, once-daily abrocitinib 200 mg, abrocitinib 100 mg, or placebo for 12 or 16 weeks (JADE COMPARE). Skin pain was rated using the Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) skin pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) item ("How painful was your skin over the past 24 h?") on a scale from 0 (not painful) to 10 (extremely painful). Itch (Peak Pruritus NRS) and QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index) were assessed. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline was analyzed using mixed-effects repeated measures modeling. Results: A total of 1,822 patients (monotherapy pool, n = 942; JADE COMPARE, n = 595; and JADE TEEN, n = 285) were analyzed. LSM change from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score was significantly greater with abrocitinib versus placebo from week 2 through week 12 or 16 across all 3 study populations and occurred in a dose-dependent manner. A greater proportion of patients achieved a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in PSAAD skin pain score with abrocitinib (200 mg and 100 mg) versus placebo in the monotherapy pool (56% and 38% vs. 12%; week 12), JADE COMPARE (72% and 52% vs. 26%; week 16), and JADE TEEN (51% and 60% vs. 31%; week 12). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients achieved a stringent threshold of skin pain improvement (PSAAD skin pain score <2) with abrocitinib versus placebo. Adults and adolescents who achieved a ≥4-point improvement in skin pain reported greater QoL improvement than those who did not achieve a ≥4-point improvement. A positive correlation (≥0.3) was observed between skin pain and QoL and separately between skin pain and itch across the 3 study populations. Conclusion: Abrocitinib as monotherapy or in combination with topical therapy improved skin pain and was associated with improved QoL in both adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD across all evaluated studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To date, there have been no large studies describing real-world treatment of chronic prurigo (CPG) and pruritus (CPR) in Germany. Objective: To determine the healthcare utilization, treatment patterns, and costs associated with CPG and CPR in Germany. Methods: Retrospective analysis using anonymized claims data (German DAK-Gesundheit), based on a 40% sample of all insured adults of the DAK-Gesundheit on December 31, 2010 (N = 2,006,003). Results: Patients with CPR (prevalence 2.2%) most commonly visited general medicine/general practitioners (GPs, 80.1%), followed by gynecologists (66.1%) and dermatologists (51.1%). Patients with CPG (prevalence 0.2%) most commonly visited dermatologists (85.7%), GPs (78.1%), and ophthalmologists (47.2%). Of adult patients, 44% received at least one drug prescription. Two thirds of patients with a drug prescription received ≥1 topical drug (66.2%), and 54.3% ≥1 systemic drug (total costs of approximately EUR 550,000 and 2,500,000, respectively). Of patients with CPG, 33.8% received ≥1 systemic and 45.1% ≥1 topical drug prescription (costs of approximately EUR 360,000 vs. 105,000). Of patients with CPR, 23.5% received ≥1 systemic and 28.6% ≥1 topical drug prescription (costs of approximately EUR 2,000,000 vs. 500,000). Of patients with CPG, 5.8% received ≥1 phototherapy application vs. 1.2% of patients with CPR. Conclusions: These findings reflect the reality of care and can form a basis for the identification of overuse, underuse, and misuse in order to design CPG and CPR healthcare more effectively and efficiently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pruritus has been shown to be a common and burdensome complaint in the general population. In some diseases, there is an even higher rate and intensity of pruritus such as in chronic kidney diseases. In particular, patients requiring dialysis commonly suffer from pruritus with proportions between 22.0 and 90.0%. Few data on the characteristics and burden of such pruritus have been published. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the extent and profiles of pruritus in such patients related to skin lesions and care. Methods: A non-interventional cross-sectional study in 14 centres for haemodialysis across Germany was conducted. The survey explored the prevalence, severity, and resulting burden of pruritus and skin lesions. Results: In total, 302 patients with uraemia (56.5% male, mean age 66.0 ± 14.4 years, mean duration of dialysis 3.9 ± 4.8 years) were included. Skin lesions appeared since start of dialysis in 50.0% of patients, with xerosis (94.7%) and desquamation (25.8%) being the most frequent and disturbing findings. Pruritus was reported by 60.9% of patients undergoing dialysis with a current mean numerical rating scale of 5.1 ± 2.4 occurring most frequently in the back, legs, and arms. About 89.0% of patients with xerosis and 69.0% with desquamation reported self-medication. However, only 40.0% and 28.0% sought medical help, respectively, indicating a remarkable lack of healthcare. Discussion: The current data suggest a more intensive focus on the skin symptoms and signs related to uraemia in the patients with dialysis and thus underline claims from a previous German large-scale study. Recommendations for early treatment and prevention of skin lesions in dialysis patients should be developed. Further research should be conducted focusing on recognizing subgroups of patients of particular vulnerability to pruritus and skin lesions, which may facilitate identifying patients at risk in an early moment. Moreover, a more specific tool for screening of skin lesions as well as pruritus may be useful since the existing instruments lack such specificity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]