Search

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Finnish version of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP), a self-assessment questionnaire to measure psychosocial limitations caused by voice disorders., Methods: The study was conducted in Tampere University Hospital in 2004 and 2005. Voice patients (n = 142) with diverse chronic voice pathologies received 3-5 sessions of voice therapy. Controls were known individuals with healthy voices (n = 127). The VAPP form was completed before attending hospital, at the first visit to hospital and before and after voice therapy., Results: When comparing patients with healthy controls significant differences were found in score means. After brief voice therapy, the VAPP values improved moderately as 60% of patients had effect size of 0.27 or over. Physicians' advice did not improve VAPP scores. The VAPP question profile was regarded as consistent. Cronbach's alpha for the question profile was 0.958 and for the subsections 0.865., Conclusions: VAPP appeared to be valid and responsive to the intervention. In test-retest reliability, although intraclass correlation was high (0.905), there was a trend for the second answers to be better than the first. Some proposals are given to improve the practicality of the VAPP form., (Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Artificial obstruction of the nose can make the nasal cavity a cul-de-sac resonator, which has clearly audible consequences. The present study compares videonasendoscopic views of the velopharyngeal mechanism in test words uttered with the nose open and obstructed in 20 subjects with a Pierre Robin sequence and in 6 subjects without this sequence. A velopharyngeal flap was constructed on 12 subjects. Videonasendoscopic findings were assessed by 3 judges with acceptable agreement. The results indicated that impairment of velopharyngeal function occurred significantly more often in subjects with a velopharyngeal flap. This was attributed to aerodynamic reasons. Clinical implications of the results are discussed.