Search

Introduction: Continuous dialysis in hemodynamically stable patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) may impact outcomes differently than intermittent dialysis. We evaluated differences in patient and kidney outcomes between the two modalities., Methods: Clinical and 30-day outcome data for inpatients with AKI who were hemodynamically stable and not on ventilation and who received intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) in public hospitals in Kuwait from January 1 to December 31, 2021, were prospectively collected., Results: We recruited 229 patients (age: 59.9 years; males, 60.3%; baseline eGFR, 56 ml/min). CKRT accounted for 72.9% of cases due to lack of access to water treatment. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of age, baseline eGFR, sex, comorbidities, cause of AKI, or fluid administration. Intensive care unit contributed 21% of cases, with no significant difference between groups. More IHD patients received diuretics (62.9% vs. 43.1% for CKRT, p = 0.008). At 30 days, 21.8% of patients had died. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between groups (16.1% for IHD vs. 24% for CKRT, p = 0.2). Final eGFR was 53.2 ml/min, with no difference between groups. Complete kidney recovery was greater with CKRT (33.1% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.009). Baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min did not influence mortality or kidney recovery., Conclusion: Compared with IHD, CKRT did not lower mortality at 30 days, which is similar to that of randomized trials; however, it was associated with better complete kidney recovery, which was reported in observational studies., (The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a monogenic disease characterized by the accumulation of fluid-filled cysts in the kidneys, leading to renal volume enlargement and progressive kidney function impairment. Disease severity, though, may vary due to allelic and genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to determine genotype-phenotype correlations between PKD1 truncating and non-truncating mutations and kidney function decline in ADPKD patients., Methods: We established a single-center retrospective cohort study in Kuwait where we followed every patient with a confirmed PKD1-ADPKD diagnosis clinically and genetically. Renal function tests were performed annually. We fitted generalized additive mixed effects models with random intercepts for each individual to analyze repeated measures of kidney function across mutation type. We then calculated survival time to kidney failure in a cox proportional hazards model. Models were adjusted for sex, age at visit, and birth year., Results: The study included 22 truncating and 20 non-truncating (42 total) patients followed for an average of 6.6 years (range: 1-12 years). Those with PKD1 truncating mutations had a more rapid rate of eGFR decline (-4.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; 95% CI: -5.0, -4.4) compared to patients with PKD1 non-truncating mutations (-3.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; 95% CI: -4.0, -3.1) (p for interaction &lt;0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of time to kidney failure showed that patients with PKD1 truncating mutations had a shorter renal survival time (median 51 years) compared to those with non-truncating mutations (median 56 years) (P for log-rank = 0.008)., Conclusion: In longitudinal and survival analyses, patients with PKD1 truncating mutations showed a faster decline in kidney function compared to patients PKD1 non-truncating mutations. Early identification of patients with PKD1 truncating mutations can, at best, inform early clinical interventions or, at least, help suggest aggressive monitoring., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)