A potential organochlorine pesticide problem was identified near Mission, Texas, by the National Pesticide Monitoring Program. Fish samples from this site have consistently contained elevated levels of DDE since 1968. Surveys were made in 1976, 1978, and 1979 to determine the extent of organochlorine pesticide contamination in fishes and birds of the area. Freshwater fishes of the Arroyo Colorado, a major waterway traversing the lower Rio Grande Valley, were highly contaminated with DDE and toxaphene residues compared to samples from other areas in the Valley; both DDE and toxaphene ranged up to 31.5 ppm wet weight in whole-fish composite samples. In addition, median DDE residues in fish-eating bird carcasses from this area ranged up to 34 ppm wet weight, and 81 ppm in individual specimens. The levels of contaminants detected in fishes and birds were within, or above, the range producing adverse effects in certain species. The major sources of contamination to the Arroyo Colorado system likely stem from past and present use of persistent pesticides onesurrounding croplands, and possibly from an abandoned pesticide plant at Mission, Texas. In 1964, the National Pesticide Monitoring Program (NPMP) was established out of public concern over the increased development and use of organic and inorganic chemicals, and their subsequent impacts on the environment. Several government agencies became involved in various monitoring efforts; these included soil, air, water, crops, fishes, and wildlife. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) began nationwide monitoring of organochlorine residues in fishes and birds in 1967 as part of the NPMP. The primary objective of the FWS program is the detection of nationwide residue trends in fishes and birds over time. A secondary objective is to identify geographical areas with unusually high residues that may warrant further study as to possible sources and adverse impacts on fish and wildlife populations. One such problem area or "hot spot" is located on the Rio Grande near Mission, Texas; fish samples from this monitoring station have consistently contained high DDE residues since 1968. Consequently, several supplemental surveys were conducted to determine the extent of DDE contamination in fishes and wildlife of the area and the possible sources of contamination. These surveys included sampling fishes at 12 sites along the main stem of the Rio Grande and at 3 sites in the lower Rio Grande Valley in 1976, and sampling fishes in 1978 and 1979 at 8 sites along the Arroyo Colorado, a major waterway traversing the lower Rio Grande Valley. In addition, fish-eating and passerine birds were collected at several localities in the lower Rio Grande Valley in 1978 and 1979. All fish and bird samples were analyzed for organochlorine residues. In this paper we present the results of those chemical analyses and discuss the significance of contamination on the affected populations. S ER NATURALIST 28(3): 5-333 AUGUST , 1983 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.208 on Wed, 28 Sep 2016 05:23:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms The Southwestern Naturalist TABLE 1.-DDE residues (ppm wet weight) in fish-composite samples from NPMP monitoring station no. 16 near Mission, Texas, 1968-1979. Ictalurus furcatus Ictalurus punctatus Dorosoma cepedianun Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Avg. Year DDE length (cm) weight (g) DDE length weight DDE length weight 19681 10.7 (2)2 26 112 0.6 (4) 42 560 2.3 (5) 31 224 19693 1.9 (5) 34 261 2.9 (5) 39 336 1.5 (5) 29 224 19704 4.0 (2) 41 485 7.3 (2) 43 560 3.9 (10) 29 224 1971 5.0 (6) 34 485 3.3 (6) 32 336 4.9 (6) 26 149 1972 4.4(4) 36 448 7.2(3) 39 410 1.1(10) 19 75 1973 3.9 (8) 48 298 0.5 (2) 25 112 1974 1.0 (10) 25 112 0.2 (5) 24 112 12.0 (5) 26 149 1976 1.7 (3) 32 224 1.7(10) 30 224 1978 2.5 (5) 35 336 2.2 (10) 25 112 1979 1.3 (10) 30 224 'DatafromHendersonetal.,(1969). 2Numberoffishineachcompositesample.. 3Data from Hendersonetal. (1971). 41970-1974 data fro Schmitt et al. (1981). MEHTODS.-Fishes were collected and stored according to the procedures outlined by Schmitt et al. (1981). In most instances, 2 composite samples, each of a different species and consisting of 2-10 adult fishes of uniform size, were collected at each station. The 1976 collections were analyzed at the Columbia National Fisheries Research Laboratory, Columbia, Missouri. Fish composites were ground and homogenized and processed for organochlorine analysis, which consisted of drying the fish tissue with anhydrous sodium sulfate, extracting the resulting mixture on a column with methylene chloride, and cleaning up the extract using gel permeation chromatography (Ribick et al., 1981). The clean extracts were separated first on florisil and then on silica gel prior to determinations of residues by gas chromatography. Limits of quantification were 0.01 ppm for organochlorine pesticides and 0.1 ppm for PCBs and toxaphene on a wet-weight basis. Fishes sampled in 1978 and 1979 were analyzed at Raltech Scientific Services, Madison, Wisconsin. The samples were ground and homogenized as described for bird carcasses by Cromartie et al. (1975) and Kaiser et al. (1980). The organochlorine contaminant analyses consisted of ether:petroleum ethel extraction of a homogenized fish-sodium sulfate mixture on a Soxhlet extractor, cleanup of the extracts on a partially deactivated florisil column, and separation of clean extracts into 3 fractions on a column of silicic acid. Determinations were made by gas chromatography and confirmed by mass spectrometry. Limits of quantification were 0.01 ppm for organochlorine pesticides and PCBs on a wet-weight basis. Birds collected with a shotgun or an air rifle in 1978 and 1979 were analyzed at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland. Common and scientific names of birds follow the 34th Supplement to the A.O.U. Check-List (Auk 99(3), 1982). Before analysis, they were skinned, and the feet, beaks, wingtips, and gastrointestinal tracts were removed. The carcasses were homogenized in a food grinder and a 10 g portion was mixed with anhydrous sodium sulfate and extracted for 7 hours in a Soxhlet apparatus. The chemical procedures used were those described by Cromartie et al. (1975) and Kaiser et al. (1980). Limits of quantification for bird tissues were 0.1 ppm for organochlorine pesticides and 0.5 ppm for PCBs on a wet-weight basis. Residues in 10% of the bird samples were confirmed by mass spectrometry. Cross checks on fish samples were made between Columbia and Raltech, and data were comparable. In addition, cross checks were made on bird samples between Raltech and Patuxent and these results also were comparable. However, no cross checks were made on samples between Columbia and Patuxent. RESULTS.-Residues in Fishes.--Over the years, DDE residues have been detected at fairly high levels (Table 1) in whole-fish composites from NPMP station No. 16 near Mission, Texas (Fig. 1). Although DDE residues in fishes at this station have varied considerably among years, levels have not declined appreciably since the use of DDT was banned in 1972, as they have at most other monitoring stations across the nation (O'Shea and Ludke, 1979). A survey in 326 vol. 28, no. 3 This content downloaded from 157.55.39.208 on Wed, 28 Sep 2016 05:23:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms White et al.-DDE and Toxaphene Residues