Search

Backbone amide hydrogen exchange rates can be used to describe the dynamic properties of a protein. Amide hydrogen exchange rates in a native protein may vary from milliseconds (ms) to several years. Ideally, the rates of all amide hydrogens of the analyte protein can be determined individually. To achieve this goal, monitoring of a wider time window is critical, in addition to high sequence coverage and high sequence resolution. Significant improvements have been made to hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry methods in the past decade for better sequence coverage and higher sequence resolution. On the other hand, little effort has been made to expand the experimental time window to accurately determine exchange rates of amide hydrogens. Many fast exchanging amide hydrogens are completely exchanged before completion of a typical short exchange time point (10-30 s) and many slow exchanging amide hydrogens do not start exchanging before a typical long exchanging time point (1-3 h). Here various experimental conditions, as well as a quenched-flow apparatus, are utilized to monitor cytochrome c amide hydrogen exchange behaviors over more than eight orders of magnitude (0.0044-1 000 000 s), when converted into the standard exchange condition (pH 7 and 23°C).

Statistical analysis of data from 39 proteins (13 766 amino acid residues) digested with immobilized porcine pepsin under conditions compatible with hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange (<1 degrees C, <30 s) was performed to examine pepsin cleavage specificity. The cleavage of pepsin was most influenced by the amino acid residue at position P1. Phe and Leu are favored residues each with a cleavage probability greater than 40%. His, Lys, Arg, or Pro residues prohibit cleavage when found at the P1 position. Pro also cannot be at position P2 (cleavage probability <0.3%). Occupation of the P3 position by His, Lys, or Arg, or occupation of the P2' position by Pro, also leads to very little cleavage (cleavage probability <1.7%). The average cleavage probability over the entire data set was 13.6%, which is slightly lower than the value previously obtained by Powers et al. (14.8%). This is due, in part, to the larger protein sizes used in the current study. While the specificity of pepsin was similar to that previously observed, higher selectivity was observed in the present study due to less experimental variation in the conditions used to generate our database., ((c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)