Search

Background: Understanding occurrence and timing of second events (recurrence and second primary cancer) is essential for cancer specific survival analysis. However, this information is not readily available in administrative data., Methods: Alberta Cancer Registry, physician claims, and other administrative data were used. Timing of second event was estimated based on our developed algorithm. For validation, the difference, in days between the algorithm estimated and the chart-reviewed timing of second event. Further, the result of Cox-regression modeling cancer-free survival was compared to chart review data., Results: Majority (74.3%) of the patients had a difference between the chart-reviewed and algorithm-estimated timing of second event falling within the 0-60 days window. Kaplan-Meier curves generated from the estimated data and chart review data were comparable with a 5-year second-event-free survival rate of 75.4% versus 72.5%., Conclusion: The algorithm provided an estimated timing of second event similar to that of the chart review., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Second event (recurrence or second primary cancer)-free survival is an important indicator for assessing treatment efficacy. However, second events are not explicitly documented in administrative data such as cancer registries. Thus, validated algorithms using administrative data are needed to identify second events of oropharyngeal cancers., Methods: The algorithms were developed using classification and regression tree models. Data from chart review served as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated., Results: The high-sensitivity algorithm achieved 87.9% (95% confidence interval: 82.2%-93.6%) sensitivity, 84.5% (81.1%-87.8%) specificity, 61.2% (54.1%-68.4%) PPV, 96.2% (94.2%-98.1%) NPV, and 85.2% (82.3%-88.1%) accuracy. The high-PPV algorithm obtained 52.4% (43.6%-61.2%) sensitivity, 99.1% (98.2%-100.0%) specificity, 94.2% (88.7%-99.7%) PPV, 88.2% (85.3%-91.0%) NPV, and 88.9% (86.3%-91.5%) accuracy., Conclusion: The validity of the algorithms for identifying second events following primary treatment of oropharyngeal cancers was acceptable., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: In 2014, Alberta Health Services released guidelines for treating oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the historical selection of patients with OSCC for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in a prospectively collected cohort of patients being treated with primary surgery. The primary outcome was compliance with the 2014 Alberta Health Services (AHS) guideline recommendations for PORT. The secondary outcome was the selection of PORT according to published pathological indications of high, intermediate, and low risk of recurrence. Reasons for discordance were analyzed., Result: Noncompliance with the new AHS guidelines and published indications for PORT was observed in 17% and 30% of cases, respectively. The reasons for discordance with published indications included: clinician decision (n = 41) and unmodifiable factors (n = 17)., Conclusion: The impact of noncompliance on patient outcomes is being studied. The effect of the publication of the guidelines on selection for PORT going forward will be monitored. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: First-1529, 2016., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: The purposes of this study were to explore the association of a postoperative clinical care pathway for patients undergoing major head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction on postdischarge health care utilization and cost and to compares a nonpathway group (n = 60) to a prospective, pathway-managed group (n = 54). Our primary purpose was to understand whether pathway-managed patients used postdischarge health care resources differently than patients managed without a care pathway., Methods: Health care utilization data (counts and costs) were collected for the 3 months after discharge. Differences in utilization were compared using Poisson regression. The null hypothesis was that there were no differences in utilization between the pathway and nonpathway groups., Results: Pathway patients had fewer postdischarge encounters in 2 of 4 sectors. Readmission costs were significantly less in the pathway group only., Conclusion: A postoperative inpatient clinical care pathway in patients with head and neck cancer is associated with decreased health care utilization and inpatient costs in the 3 months after discharge. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1216-E1220, 2016., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represents the most common SCC affecting the head and neck region. Long-term survival of patients with oral cavity SCC is adversely affected by lymph node metastasis and further decreased by the presence of lymph node extracapsular spread (ECS)., Methods: Using a case-control design, preoperative CT scans from patients with oral cavity SCC and metastatic lymphadenopathy were evaluated by 2 independent neuroradiologists, blinded to the study, for a number of radiologic parameters, including central node necrosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify parameters independently predicting pathologic ECS., Results: For both neuroradiologists, central node necrosis was a significant predictor of ECS, with high interrater agreement (kappa = 0.71). On multivariate analysis, only central node necrosis independently predicted ECS (odds ratio [OR] = 12.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-119). Central node necrosis predicted ECS with 91% sensitivity and 88% negative predictive values., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that central node necrosis on preoperative CT scans is strongly associated with the presence of ECS., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)