Search

Background: Complex intracavity and interstitial (IC/IS) applicators, such as the Venezia applicator, can improve the HR-CTV coverage while adequately protecting organs at risk in the treatment of cervical cancer with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Although the Venezia applicator offers more choice for catheter selection, commercially available catheter and dose optimization algorithms are still missing for complex applicators. Moreover, studies on catheter and dose optimization for IC/IS implants in the treatment of cervical cancer are still limited., Purpose: This work aims to combine a GPU-based multi-criteria optimization (gMCO) algorithm with a sparse catheter (SC) optimization algorithm for the Venezia applicator., Methods: Fifty-eight cervical cancer patients who received 28 Gy in 4 fx of HDR brachytherapy with the Venezia applicator (combination to external beam radiation therapy) are retrospectively revisited. The modelization of the applicator is done by virtually reconstructing all the IS catheters passing through the ring. Template catheters are reconstructed using an in-house python script. To perform simultaneous MCO and SC optimization (SC+MCO), the objective function includes aggregated dose objectives in a weighted sum and a group sparsity term that individually penalizes the contribution of IS catheters. Plans generated with the SC+MCO algorithm are compared with plans generated with MCO using clinical catheters (CC+MCO) and the clinical plans (CP). The EMBRACE II soft constraints (planning aims) and hard constraints (limits for prescribed dose) are used as plan evaluation criteria., Results: CC+MCO gives the most important gain with an increase up to 20.7% in meeting all EMBRACE II soft constraints compared with CP. The SC+MCO algorithm (adding catheter optimization to MCO) provides a second order increase (up to 12.1% with total acceptance rate of 60.3% or 35/58) in the acceptance rate versus CC+MCO (total increase of 32.8% vs. CP). Acceptance rate in EMBRACE II hard constraints is 98.3% (57/58) for both CC+MCO and SC+MCO versus 91.4% (53/58) for CP. The median SC+MCO optimization time is 11 s to generate a total of 5000 Pareto-optimal plans with different catheter configurations (position and number) for each fraction., Conclusions: Simultaneous catheter and MCO optimization is clinically feasible for HDR cervical cancer brachytherapy using the Venezia applicator. Clinical catheter configurations could be improved and/or the catheter number could be reduced without decreasing plan quality using SC+MCO compared with the CP., (© 2023 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: The goal of the present work was to evaluate the accuracy of a plastic scintillation detector (PSD) system to perform in-phantom dosimetry during 192Ir high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatments., Methods: A PSD system capable of stem effect removal was built. A red-green-blue photodiode connected to a dual-channel electrometer was used to detect the scintillation light emitted from a green scintillation component and transmitted along a plastic optical fiber. A clinically relevant prostate treatment plan was built using the HDR brachytherapy treatment planning system. An in-house fabricated template was used for accurate positioning of the catheters, and treatment delivery was performed in a water phantom. Eleven catheters were inserted and used for dose delivery from 192Ir radioactive source, while two others were used to mimic dosimetry at the rectum wall and in the urethra using a PSD. The measured dose and dose rate data were compared to the expected values from the planning system. The importance of removing stem effects from in vivo dosimetry using a PSD during 192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatments was assessed. Applications for dwell position error detection and temporal verification of the treatment delivery were also investigated., Results: In-phantom dosimetry measurements of the treatment plan led to a ratio to the expected dose of 1.003 +/- 0.004 with the PSD at different positions in the urethra and 1.043 +/- 0.003 with the PSD inserted in the rectum. Verification for the urethra of dose delivered within each catheter and at specific dwell positions led to average measured to expected ratios of 1.015 +/- 0.019 and 1.014 +/- 0.020, respectively. These values at the rectum wall were 1.059 +/- 0.045 within each catheter and 1.025 +/- 0.028 for specific dwell positions. The ability to detect positioning errors of the source depended of the tolerance on the difference to the expected value. A 5-mm displacement of the source was detected by the PSD system from 78% to 100% of the time depending on the acceptable range value. The implementation of a stem effect removal technique was shown to be necessary, particularly when calculating doses at specific dwell positions, and allowed decreasing the number of false-error detections-the detection of an error when it should not be the case--from 19 to 1 for a 5% threshold out of 43 measurements. The use of the PSD system to perform temporal verification of elapsed time by the source in each catheter--generally on the order of minutes--was shown to be in agreement within a couple of seconds with the treatment plan, Conclusions: We showed that the PSD system used in this study, which was capable of stem effect removal, can perform accurate dosimetry during 192Ir HDR brachytherapy treatment in a water phantom. The system presented here shows some clear advantages over previously proposed dosimetry systems for HDR brachytherapy, and it has the potential for various online verifications of treatment delivery quality.

Total body irradiations (TBIs) are unusual radiation therapy techniques used to treat specific hematological diseases. Most TBI techniques use extended source to patient distances [source-to-skin distance (SSD)] to provide lateral or anteroposterior irradiations. Those techniques differ from one institution to the other since they need to be customized to accommodate for local material constraints. However, with those unusual techniques come additional challenges for dose calculation. The purpose of this study was to obtain an accurate (better than 4%) dose calculation model for extended source-to-skin distance (eSSD) treatment techniques, which will be used for TBI planning. The studied dynamic TBI technique has special aspects (eSSD, beam spoiler, large field, and out of field dose contribution) that need to be considered in dose calculation. The first part of this study presents an eSSD beam model commissioning in PINNACLE3 and its validation. The second part looks at the comparison between two dose calculation algorithms, the 3D pencil beam and the superposition-convolution algorithms implemented in THERAPLAN PLUS and PINNACLE3, respectively. A regular linac beam was commissioned in each treatment planning system and an additional dedicated TBI beam model was implemented in PINNACLE3. The comparison results indicate that the quality of the TBI treatment greatly depends on the treatment planning system and its beam commissioning. The superposition-convolution algorithm (PINNACLE3) provides a better dose calculation tool for TBI than the 3D pencil beam algorithm (THERAPLAN PLUS) with a maximum mean error of 2.2% on a dynamic treatment. The TBI specific beam model of PINNACLE3 (ESSP-P3) also improves the dose calculation. The maximum difference between calculations and measurements (depth doses and beam profiles) was 2% except for extreme cases (build-up region and depth of 20 cm) where the error was higher. Output factor determination and the dose contribution outside the primary beam weaknesses were found in PINNACLE3. Methods are proposed to overcome these limitations. With the correction method applied, the TBI specific beam model allows a maximum mean error of -0.68% on a dynamic treatment. Accurate TBI dose computation necessitates a good dose calculation algorithm combined with a realistic beam model. Inappropriate dose calculation could lead to an important over- or underdose estimation. No perfect algorithm and beam model were found, but methods are proposed to overcome some of the limitations. Those methods are simple and can be used for other eSSD treatment types.

Purpose: To perform full 3D heterogeneous dose calculations for total body irradiation (TBI) cases and compare different treatment planning softwares (TPS)., Method: A retrospective study was performed on 7 patients. Dose distributions obtained with Pinnacle 3 v.7.9u (Philips Medical Systems) were compared with the ones calculated using our actual TBI planning system Theraplan Plus (TPP) by MDS Nordion/Nucletron. Two different Pinnacle 3 models were studied: standard beam commissioning (std_Pinnacle 3 ) and TBI commissioning (TBI_Pinnacle 3 ). For the later case, commissioning was adapted for the special TBI conditions (extended SSD of 190cm, large field, acrylic beam spoiler, and out of field dose (OFD))., Results: Significant differences are found between the TPP, std_Pinnacle 3 and TBI_Pinnacle 3 dose distributions. For the relative mid-line doses, differences up to 12% were observed. Systematic overestimations of 5% were found in patients extremities between TPP and TBI_Pinnacle 3 . Average dose underestimation of 3% was observed between std_Pinnacle 3 and TBI_Pinnacle 3 . Differences in patient extremities are attributed to the OFD contribution which is not correctly computed in TPP and std_Pinnacle 3 . Dose comparison outside the patient's mid-line showed greater differences (up to 20%) between models. Accurate 3D heterogeneous dose calculations with TBI_Pinnacle 3 model show major differences (homogeneous versus heterogeneous) in high and low density regions. Dose overestimation of 5% was observed in bony regions and dose underestimation of 5% to 10% was observed in lung regions., Conclusion: Those results are of major interest since they show a strong dependence of the dose calculation outcome on both TPS and commissioning used, potentially leading to significant dose misevaluation., (© 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Total body irradiation (TBI) is an efficient part of the treatment for malignant hematological diseases. Dynamic TBI techniques provide great advantages (e.g., dose homogeneity, patient comfort) while overcoming treatment room space restrictions. However, with dynamic techniques come additional organs at risk (OAR) protection challenges. In most dynamic TBI techniques, lead attenuators are used to diminish the dose received by the OARs. The purpose of this study was to characterize the dose deposition under various shapes of attenuators in static and dynamic treatments. This characterization allows for the development of a correction method to improve attenuator design in dynamic treatments. The dose deposition under attenuators at different depths in dynamic treatment was compared with the static situation based on two definitions: the coverage areas and the penumbra regions. The coverage area decreases with depth in dynamic treatment while it is stable for the static situation. The penumbra increases with depth in both treatment modes, but the increasing rate is higher in the dynamic situation. Since the attenuator coverage is deficient in the dynamic treatment mode, a correction method was developed to modify the attenuator design in order to improve the OAR protection. The correction method is divided in two steps. The first step is based on the use of elongation charts, which provide appropriate attenuator coverage and acceptable penumbra for a specific depth. The second point is a correction method for the thoracic inclination, which can introduce an orientation problem in both static and dynamic treatments. This two steps correction method is simple to use and personalized to each patient's anatomy. It can easily be adapted to any dynamic TBI techniques.

An algorithm for the daily localization of the prostate using implanted markers and a standard video-based electronic portal imaging device (V-EPID) has been tested. Prior to planning, three gold markers were implanted in the prostate of seven patients. The clinical images were acquired with a BeamViewPlus 2.1 V-EPID for each field during the normal course radiotherapy treatment and are used off-line to determine the ability of the automatic marker detection algorithm to adequately and consistently detect the markers. Clinical images were obtained with various dose levels from ranging 2.5 to 75 MU. The algorithm is based on marker attenuation characterization in the portal image and spatial distribution. A total of 1182 clinical images were taken. The results show an average efficiency of 93% for the markers detected individually and 85% for the group of markers. This algorithm accomplishes the detection and validation in 0.20-0.40 s. When the center of mass of the group of implanted markers is used, then all displacements can be corrected to within 1.0 mm in 84% of the cases and within 1.5 mm in 97% of cases. The standard video-based EPID tested provides excellent marker detection capability even with low dose levels. The V-EPID can be used successfully with radiopaque markers and the automatic detection algorithm to track and correct the daily setup deviations due to organ motions.