Search

The rapid advancement in the field of medical imaging presents a challenge in keeping up to date with the necessary objective evaluations and optimizations for safe and effective use in clinical settings. These evaluations are traditionally done using clinical imaging trials, which while effective, pose several limitations including high costs, ethical considerations for repetitive experiments, time constraints, and lack of ground truth. To tackle these issues, virtual trials (aka in silico trials) have emerged as a promising alternative, using computational models of human subjects and imaging devices, and observer models/analysis to carry out experiments. To facilitate the widespread use of virtual trials within the medical imaging research community, a major need is to establish a common consensus framework that all can use. Based on the ongoing efforts of an AAPM Task Group (TG387), this article provides a comprehensive overview of the requirements for establishing virtual imaging trial frameworks, paving the way toward their widespread use within the medical imaging research community. These requirements include credibility, reproducibility, and accessibility. Credibility assessment involves verification, validation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis, ensuring the accuracy and realism of computational models. A proper credibility assessment requires a clear context of use and the questions that the study is intended to objectively answer. For reproducibility and accessibility, this article highlights the need for detailed documentation, user-friendly software packages, and standard input/output formats. Challenges in data and software sharing, including proprietary data and inconsistent file formats, are discussed. Recommended solutions to enhance accessibility include containerized environments and data-sharing hubs, along with following standards such as CDISC (Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium). By addressing challenges associated with credibility, reproducibility, and accessibility, virtual imaging trials can be positioned as a powerful and inclusive resource, advancing medical imaging innovation and regulatory science., (© 2024 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a recently developed functional x-ray imaging technique that detects pulmonary ventilation impairment as a decrease in changes in lung density during respiration. However, the diagnostic performance of DCR is uncertain owing to an insufficient number of clinical cases. One solution is virtual imaging trials (VITs), which is an emerging alternative method for efficiently evaluating medical imaging technology via computer simulation techniques., Purpose: This study aimed to estimate the typical threshold thickness of residual normal tissue below which the presence of emphysema may be detected by DCR via VITs using virtual patients with different physiques and a user-defined ground truth., Methods: Twenty extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantoms that exhibited changes in lung density during respiration were generated to simulate virtual patients. To simulate a locally collapsed lung, an air sphere was inserted into each lung regions in the phantom. The XCAT phantom was virtually projected using an x-ray simulator. The respiratory changes in pixel value (ΔPV) were measured on the projected air spheres (simulated lesions) to calculate the percentage of decrease (ΔPV%) relative to ΔPV exp-ins in the absence of an air sphere. The relationship between the amount of residual normal tissue and ΔPV% was fitted to a cubic approximation curve (hereafter, performance curve), and the threshold at which the ΔPV% began to decrease (normal-tissue thre ) was determined. The goodness of fit for each performance curve was evaluated according to the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) and the 95% confidence interval derived from the standard errors between the measured and theoretical values corresponding to each performance curve. The ΔPV% was also visualized as a color scaling to validate the results of the VITs in both virtual and clinical patients., Results: For each lung region in all body sizes, the ΔPV% decreased as the amount of residual normal tissue decreased and could be defined as a function of the amount of residual normal tissue in front of and behind the simulated lesions with high R 2 values. Meanwhile, the difference between the measured and theoretical values corresponding to each performance curve was only partially included in the 95% confidence interval. The normal-tissue thre values were 146.0, 179.5, and 170.9 mm for the upper, middle, and lower lungs, respectively, which were demonstrated in virtual patients and one real patient, where the value of the residual normal tissue was less than that of normal-tissue thre ; any reduction in the residual normal tissue was reflected as a reduced ΔPV and depicted as a reduced color intensity., Conclusions: The performance of DCR-based pulmonary impairment assessment depends on the amount of residual normal tissue in front of and behind the lesion rather than on the lesion size. The performance curve can be defined as a function of the amount of residual normal tissue in each lung region with a specific threshold of normal tissue remaining where lesions become detectable, shown as a decrease in ΔPV. The results of VITs are expected to accelerate future clinical trials for DCR-based pulmonary function assessment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has recently emerged into clinical use; however, its optimum imaging protocols and added benefits remains unknown in terms of providing more accurate lung density quantification compared to energy-integrating computed tomography (EICT) scanners., Purpose: To systematically assess the performance of a clinical PCCT scanner for lung density quantifications and compare it against EICT., Methods: This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective analysis of subjects scanned (August-December 2021) using a clinical PCCT system. The influence of altering reconstruction parameters was studied (reconstruction kernel, pixel size, slice thickness). A virtual CT dataset of anthropomorphic virtual subjects was acquired to demonstrate the correspondence of findings to clinical dataset, and to perform systematic imaging experiments, not possible using human subjects. The virtual subjects were imaged using a validated, scanner-specific CT simulator of a PCCT and two EICT (defined as EICT A and B) scanners. The images were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) of lung and emphysema density against their corresponding ground truth., Results: Clinical and virtual PCCT datasets showed similar trends, with sharper kernels and smaller voxel sizes increasing percentage of low-attenuation areas below -950 HU (LAA-950) by up to 15.7 ± 6.9% and 11.8 ± 5.5%, respectively. Under the conditions studied, higher doses, thinner slices, smaller pixel sizes, iterative reconstructions, and quantitative kernels with medium sharpness resulted in lower lung MAE values. While using these settings for PCCT, changes in the dose level (13 to 1.3 mGy), slice thickness (0.4 to 1.5 mm), pixel size (0.49 to 0.98 mm), reconstruction technique (70 keV-VMI to wFBP), and kernel (Qr48 to Qr60) increased lung MAE by 15.3 ± 2.0, 1.4 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.3, 4.2 ± 0.8, and 9.1 ± 1.6 HU, respectively. At the optimum settings identified per scanner, PCCT images exhibited lower lung and emphysema MAE than those of EICT scanners (by 2.6 ± 1.0 and 9.6 ± 3.4 HU, compared to EICT A, and by 4.8 ± 0.8 and 7.4 ± 2.3 HU, compared to EICT B). The accuracy of lung density measurements was correlated with subjects' mean lung density (p < 0.05), measured by PCCT at optimum setting under the conditions studied., Conclusion: Photon-counting CT demonstrated superior performance in density quantifications, with its influences of imaging parameters in line with energy-integrating CT scanners. The technology offers improvement in lung quantifications, thus demonstrating potential toward more objective assessment of respiratory conditions., (© 2024 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: As a leading cause of death, worldwide, cardiovascular disease is of great clinical importance. Among cardiovascular diseases, coronary artery disease (CAD) is a key contributor, and it is the attributed cause of death for 10% of all deaths annually. The prevalence of CAD is commensurate with the rise in new medical imaging technologies intended to aid in its diagnosis and treatment. The necessary clinical trials required to validate and optimize these technologies require a large cohort of carefully controlled patients, considerable time to complete, and can be prohibitively expensive. A safer, faster, less expensive alternative is using virtual imaging trials (VITs), utilizing virtual patients or phantoms combined with accurate computer models of imaging devices., Purpose: In this work, we develop realistic, physiologically-informed models for coronary plaques for application in cardiac imaging VITs., Methods: Histology images of plaques at micron-level resolution were used to train a deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DC-GAN) to create a library of anatomically variable plaque models with clinical anatomical realism. The stability of each plaque was evaluated by finite element analysis (FEA) in which plaque components and vessels were meshed as volumes, modeled as specialized tissues, and subjected to the range of normal coronary blood pressures. To demonstrate the utility of the plaque models, we combined them with the whole-body XCAT computational phantom to perform initial simulations comparing standard energy-integrating detector (EID) CT with photon-counting detector (PCD) CT., Results: Our results show the network is capable of generating realistic, anatomically variable plaques. Our simulation results provide an initial demonstration of the utility of the generated plaque models as targets to compare different imaging devices., Conclusions: Vast, realistic, and variable CAD pathologies can be generated to incorporate into computational phantoms for VITs. There they can serve as a known truth from which to optimize and evaluate cardiac imaging technologies quantitatively., (© 2024 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Image quality of photon-counting and energy integrating CT scanners changes with object size, dose to the object, and kernel selection., Purpose: To comprehensively compare task-generic image quality of photon-counting CT (PCCT) and energy integrating CT (EICT) systems as a function of phantom size, dose, and reconstruction kernel., Methods: A size-variant phantom (Mercury Phantom 3.0) was used to characterize the image quality of PCCT and EICT systems as a function of object size. The phantom contained five cylinders attached by slanted tapered sections. Each cylinder contained two sections: one uniform for noise, and the other with inserts for spatial resolution and contrast measurements. The phantom was scanned on Siemens' SOMATOM Force and NAEOTOM Alpha at 1.18 and 7.51 mGy without tube current modulation. CTDI vol was matched across two systems by setting the required tube currents, else, all other acquisition settings were fixed. CT sinograms were reconstructed using FBP and iterative (ADMIRE2 - Force; QIR2 - Alpha) algorithms with Body regular (Br) kernels. Noise Power Spectrum (NPS), Task Transfer Function (TTF), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and detectability index (d') for a task of identifying 2-mm disk were evaluated based on AAPM TG-233 metrology using imQuest, an open-source software package. Averaged noise frequency (f av ) and 50% cut-off frequency for TTF (f 50 ) were used as scalar metrics to quantify noise texture and spatial resolution, respectively. The difference between image quality metrics' measurements was calculated as IQ PCCT - IQ EICT ., Results: From Br40 (soft) to Br64 (sharp), f 50 for air insert increased from 0.35 mm -1  ± 0.04 (standard deviation) to 0.76 mm -1  ± 0.17, 0.34 mm -1  ± 0.04 to 0.77 mm -1  ± 0.17, 0.37 mm -1  ± 0.02 to 0.95 mm -1  ± 0.17 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively, when averaged over all sizes and dose levels. Similarly, from Br40 to Br64, noise magnitude increased from 10.86 HU ± 7.12 to 38.61 HU ± 18.84, 10.94 HU ± 7.08 to 38.82 HU ± 18.70, 13.74 HU ± 11.02 to 52.11 HU ± 26.22 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively. The difference in f av was consistent across all sizes and dose levels. PCCT-70keV-VMI showed better consistency in contrast measurements for iodine and bone inserts than PCCT-T3D and EICT; however, PCCT-T3D had higher contrast for both inserts. From Br40 to Br64, considering all sizes and dose levels, CNR for iodine insert decreased from 52.30 ± 46.44 to 12.18 ± 10.07, 40.42 ± 33.42 to 9.48 ± 7.16, 39.94 ± 37.60 to 7.84 ± 6.67 for PCCT-T3D-QIR2, PCCT-70keV-QIR2, and EICT-ADMIRE2, respectively., Conclusions: Both PCCT image types, T3D and 70-keV-VMI exhibited similar or better noise, contrast, CNR than EICT when comparing kernels with similar names. For 512 × 512 matrix, PCCT's sharp kernels had lower resolution than EICT's sharp kernels. For all image quality metrics, except extreme low, every dose condition had a similar set of IQ-matching kernels. It suggests that considering patient size and dose level to determine IQ-matching kernel pairs across PCCT and EICT systems may not be imperative while translating protocols, except when the signal to the detector is extremely low., (© 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: High tube current generates a high flux of x-rays to photon counting detectors (PCDs) that can potentially result in the piling up of pulses formed by concurrent photons, which can cause count loss and energy resolution degradation., Purpose: To evaluate the performance of clinical photon-counting CT (PCCT) systems in high flux, potentially influenced by pulse pileup effects, in terms of task-generic image quality metrics., Methods: A clinical phantom was scanned on a commercial PCCT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 120 kV under fourteen different tube current levels (40-1000 mA) with a rotation time of 0.25 s and a pitch of 1. The dose levels corresponded to CTDI vol (32 cm phantom) of 0.79-19.8 mGy. CT sinograms were reconstructed using QIR-off mode (noniterative reconstruction algorithm), Br44 kernel, and a voxel size of 0.4102 × 0.4102 × 3 mm 3 $0.4102 \times 0.4102 \times 3{\mathrm{\ mm}}^3$ . imQuest, an open-source MATLAB-based software package was used to calculate noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and CT number according to AAPM Task Group 233 metrology., Results: The 50% cut-off frequency of TTF (f 50 ) remained mostly constant across all higher tube currents for all inserts, namely polyethylene, bone, air, and acrylic. Using the lowest two data points (40 and 80 mA), the expected relationship between noise magnitude and tube current was determined to be noise ∝ $ \propto \ $ mA -0.47 . The measured noise magnitude were up to 11.1% higher than the expected value at the highest tube current. The average frequency of NPS (f av ) decreased from 0.32 to 0.29 mm -1 as tube current increased from 40 to 1000 mA. No considerable effects were observed in CT number measurement of any insert; however, CT numbers for air and bone changed almost monotonically as tube current increased. Absolute CNR increased monotonically for all inserts; however, the difference between measured and expected CNRs were approximately -6% to 12% across all tube currents., Conclusions: Increasing tube currents did not affect the spatial resolution, but slightly affected the CT number and noise measurements of the clinical PCCT system. However, the effects were only considerable at clinically irrelevant tube currents used on a small 20-cm phantom. In general clinical practices, automatic exposure control techniques are used to decrease the variation of flux on the detector, which alleviates the chances of detector saturation due to high count rates. The observed effects could be due to pulse pileup, signal-dependent filtration of the system, or nonlinearities in the reconstruction algorithm. In conclusion, either the deadtime of the detector used in the photon-counting CT system is shorter such that count losses due to pulse pileup are negligible, or pulse pileup has inconsiderable effects on the image quality of clinical photon-counting CT systems in routine clinical practice due to possible corrections applied on the system., (© 2023 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Quantitative analysis of computed tomography (CT) images traditionally utilizes real patient data that can pose challenges with replicability, efficiency, and radiation exposure. Instead, virtual imaging trials (VITs) can overcome these hurdles through computer simulations of models of patients and imaging systems. DukeSim is a scanner-specific CT imaging simulator that has previously been validated with simple cylindrical phantoms, but not with anthropomorphic conditions and clinically relevant measurements., Purpose: To validate a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) for the assessment of lung imaging biomarkers under clinically relevant conditions across multiple scanners using an anthropomorphic chest phantom, and to demonstrate the utility of virtual trials by studying the effects or radiation dose and reconstruction kernels on the lung imaging quantifications., Methods: An anthropomorphic chest phantom with customized tube inserts was imaged with two commercial scanners (Siemens Force and Siemens Flash) at 28 dose and reconstruction conditions. A computational version of the chest phantom was used with a scanner-specific CT simulator (DukeSim) to simulate virtual images corresponding to the settings of the real acquisitions. Lung imaging biomarkers were computed from both real and simulated CT images and quantitatively compared across all imaging conditions. The VIT framework was further utilized to investigate the effects of radiation dose (20-300 mAs) and reconstruction settings (Qr32f, Qr40f, and Qr69f reconstruction kernels using ADMIRE strength 3) on the accuracy of lung imaging biomarkers, compared against the ground-truth values modeled in the computational chest phantom., Results: The simulated CT images matched closely the real images for both scanners and all imaging conditions qualitatively and quantitatively, with the average biomarker percent error of 3.51% (range 0.002%-18.91%). The VIT study showed that sharper reconstruction kernels had lower accuracy with errors in mean lung HU of 84-94 HU, lung volume of 797-3785 cm 3 , and lung mass of -800 to 1751 g. Lower tube currents had the lower accuracy with errors in mean lung HU of 6-84 HU, lung volume of 66-3785 cm 3 , and lung mass of 170-1751 g. Other imaging biomarkers were consistent under the studied reconstruction settings and tube currents., Conclusion: We comprehensively evaluated the realism of DukeSim in an anthropomorphic setup across a diverse range of imaging conditions. This study paves the way toward utilizing VITs more reliably for conducting medical imaging experiments that are not practical using actual patient images., (© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: Virtual (in silico) imaging trials (VITs), involving computerized phantoms and models of the imaging process, provide a modern alternative to clinical imaging trials. VITs are faster, safer, and enable otherwise-impossible investigations. Current phantoms used in VITs are limited in their ability to model functional behavior such as contrast perfusion which is an important determinant of dose and image quality in CT imaging. In our prior work with the XCAT computational phantoms, we determined and modeled inter-organ (organ to organ) intravenous contrast concentration as a function of time from injection. However, intra-organ concentration, heterogeneous distribution within a given organ, was not pursued. We extend our methods in this work to model intra-organ concentration within the XCAT phantom with a specific focus on the liver., Methods: Intra-organ contrast perfusion depends on the organ's vessel network. We modeled the intricate vascular structures of the liver, informed by empirical and theoretical observations of anatomy and physiology. The developed vessel generation algorithm modeled a dual-input-single-output vascular network as a series of bifurcating surfaces to optimally deliver flow within the bounding surface of a given XCAT liver. Using this network, contrast perfusion was simulated within voxelized versions of the phantom by using knowledge of the blood velocities in each vascular structure, vessel diameters and length, and the time since the contrast entered the hepatic artery. The utility of the enhanced phantom was demonstrated through a simulation study with the phantom voxelized prior to CT simulation with the relevant liver vasculature prepared to represent blood and iodinated contrast media. The spatial extent of the blood-contrast mixture was compared to clinical data., Results: The vascular structures of the liver were generated with size and orientation which resulted in minimal energy expenditure required to maintain blood flow. Intravenous contrast was simulated as having known concentration and known total volume in the liver as calibrated from time-concentration curves. Measurements of simulated CT ROIs were found to agree with clinically observed values of early arterial phase contrast enhancement of the parenchyma ( ∼ 5 $ \sim 5$ HU). Similarly, early enhancement in the hepatic artery was found to agree with average clinical enhancement ( 180 $(180$ HU)., Conclusions: The computational methods presented here furthered the development of the XCAT phantoms allowing for multi-timepoint contrast perfusion simulations, enabling more anthropomorphic virtual clinical trials intended for optimization of current clinical imaging technologies and applications., (© 2022 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: The current state-of-the-art calculation of detectability index (d') is largely phantom-based, with the latest being based on a hybrid phantom noise power spectrum (NPS) combined with patient-specific noise magnitude and high-contrast air-skin interface. The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the use of fully patient-specific measurements of noise and low-contrast resolution, derived entirely from patient images on d'., Methods: This study developed a d' calculation that is patient- and task-specific, employing newly developed algorithms for estimating patient-specific NPS and low-contrast task transfer function (TTF). The TTF estimation methodology used a trained regression support vector machine (SVM) to estimate a fitted form of the TTF given a variance-normalized estimate of the NPS (referred to as the TTF NPS ). The regression SVM was trained and tested using five-fold cross-validation on 192 scans (4 dose levels x 6 reconstruction kernels x 4 repeats) of a phantom with low-contrast polyethylene insert and reconstructed with filtered backprojection and iterative reconstructions across 12 clinically relevant kernels (FBP: B20f, B31f, B45f; SAFIRE: I26f, I31f, J45f with strengths: 2, 3, 5). To test the low-contrast TTF estimation method, the estimated TTF NPS measurements were compared to (1) TTF measurements from the air-phantom interface (referred to as the TTF air , representing the most patient-specific clinical alternative) and (2) TTF measurements from the edge of the low-contrast polyethylene insert (referred to as the TTF poly ), which represented the gold standard of low-contrast TTF measurement. Patient-specific NPS, patient-specific noise magnitude, and patient-specific low-contrast TTF were further combined with a reference task function to calculate a d' (according to a non-prewhitening matched filter model) across 1120 lesions previously evaluated in 2AFC human observer detection of liver lesions. The resulting values were compared to the observer results using a generalized linear mixed-effects statistical model. The correlations between the model and observer results were also compared with previously reported values (using a hybrid method with phantom-derived NPS and TTF air )., Results: The TTF NPS more accurately represented resolution across the considered reconstruction settings, compared with the TTF air . The out-of-fold predictions of the TTF NPS had statistically better root-mean-square error concordance (p < 0.05, one-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test) to gold standard than the TTF air (the alternative, measured from the air-phantom interface). Detectability indices informed by purely patient-specific NPS and TTF were strongly correlated with 2AFC outcomes (p < 0.05). R 2 between human detection accuracy and model-predicted detection accuracy were shown to be greater for those measured with patient-specific d' than for the hybrid d' but failed to rise to the level of statistical significance (p ≥ 0.05, bootstrap resampled corrected paired Student's t-test)., Conclusions: The results suggest that fully patient-specific characterization of image quality based on in vivo NPS and low-contrast TTF offer advantages over hybrid methods. The results in terms of d' favorably relate to observer detection of liver lesions. The method can potentially be integrated into an automated image quality tracking system to assess image quality across a computed tomography clinical operation without needing phantom scans., (© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: Accurate preoperative assessment of tumor invasion/adhesion is crucial for planning appropriate operative procedures. Recent advances in digital radiography allow a motion analysis of lung tumors with dynamic chest radiography (DCR) with total exposure dose comparable to that of conventional chest radiography. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of preoperative evaluation of pleural invasion/adhesion of lung tumors with DCR through a virtual clinical imaging study, using a four-dimensional (4D) extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) computational phantom., Methods: An XCAT phantom of an adult man (50th percentile in height and weight) with simulated respiratory and cardiac motions was generated to use as a virtual patient. To simulate lung tumors with and without pleural invasion, a 30-mm diameter tumor sphere was inserted into each lobe of the phantom. The virtual patient during respiration was virtually projected using an x-ray simulator in posteroanterior (PA) and oblique directions, and sequential bone suppression (BS) images were created. The measurement points (tumor, rib, and diaphragm) were automatically tracked on simulated images by a template matching technique. We calculated five quantitative metrics related to the movement distance and directions of the targeted tumor and evaluated whether DCR could distinguish between tumors with and without pleural invasion/adhesion., Results: Precise tracking of the targeted tumor was achieved on the simulated BS images without undue influence of rib shadows. There was a significant difference in all five quantitative metrics between the lung tumors with and without pleural invasion both on the oblique and PA projection views (P < 0.05). Quantitative metrics related to the movement distance were effective for tumors in the middle and lower lobes, while, those related to the movement directions were effective for tumors close to the frontal chest wall on the oblique projection view. The oblique views were useful for the evaluation of the space between the chest wall and a moving tumor., Conclusion: DCR could help distinguish between tumors with and without pleural invasion/adhesion based on the two-dimensional movement distance and direction using oblique and PA projection views. With anticipated improved image: processing to evaluate the respiratory displacement of lung tumors in the upper lobe or behind the heart, DCR holds promise for clinical assessment of tumor invasion/adhesion in the parietal pleura., (© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: Automated assessment of perceptual image quality on clinical Computed Tomography (CT) data by computer algorithms has the potential to greatly facilitate data-driven monitoring and optimization of CT image acquisition protocols. The application of these techniques in clinical operation requires the knowledge of how the output of the computer algorithms corresponds to clinical expectations. This study addressed the need to validate algorithmic image quality measurements on clinical CT images with preferences of radiologists and determine the clinically acceptable range of algorithmic measurements for abdominal CT examinations., Materials and Methods: Algorithmic measurements of image quality metrics (organ HU, noise magnitude, and clarity) were performed on a clinical CT image dataset with supplemental measures of noise power spectrum from phantom images using techniques developed previously. The algorithmic measurements were compared to clinical expectations of image quality in an observer study with seven radiologists. Sets of CT liver images were selected from the dataset where images in the same set varied in terms of one metric at a time. These sets of images were shown via a web interface to one observer at a time. First, the observer rank ordered the CT images in a set according to his/her preference for the varying metric. The observer then selected his/her preferred acceptable range of the metric within the ranked images. The agreement between algorithmic and observer rankings of image quality were investigated and the clinically acceptable image quality in terms of algorithmic measurements were determined., Results: The overall rank-order agreements between algorithmic and observer assessments were 0.90, 0.98, and 1.00 for noise magnitude, liver parenchyma HU, and clarity, respectively. The results indicate a strong agreement between the algorithmic and observer assessments of image quality. Clinically acceptable thresholds (median) of algorithmic metric values were (17.8, 32.6) HU for noise magnitude, (92.1, 131.9) for liver parenchyma HU, and (0.47, 0.52) for clarity., Conclusions: The observer study results indicated that these algorithms can robustly assess the perceptual quality of clinical CT images in an automated fashion. Clinically acceptable ranges of algorithmic measurements were determined. The correspondence of these image quality assessment algorithms to clinical expectations paves the way toward establishing diagnostic reference levels in terms of clinically acceptable perceptual image quality and data-driven optimization of CT image acquisition protocols., (© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: To develop and validate an automated technique for measuring organ Hounsfield units (HUs) in clinical chest CT images., Materials and Methods: An automated computer algorithm was developed to measure the distribution of HUs inside four major organs: the lungs, liver, aorta, and spine. These organs were first identified using image processing techniques. Each organ was segmented into multiple regions of interest (ROIs) and characterized in terms of HU values. The medians of the ROI histograms were computed for each dataset. The automated results were validated by assessing their correlation with manual measurements in fifteen contrast-enhanced and fifteen non-contrast-enhanced clinical chest CT datasets. The robustness of the measurements with respect to dependency on image noise and CTDI vol was ascertained. One utility of the approach was further demonstrated in assessing the variability in aorta HUs across 732 patients undergoing noncontrast and contrast-enhanced examinations., Results: The algorithm successfully measured the histograms of the four organs in both contrast and non-contrast-enhanced chest CT exams. The automated measurements were in agreement with manual measurements with a near unity slope of the relationship between automated and manual measurements with high coefficient of determination (slope = 0.931-1.003, R 2 = 0.89-0.99). Organ median HU measurements were found to be largely independent of both image noise and CTDI vol (P > 0.05), as expected. Across patient cases, the program ran successfully across 95% (697/732) of cases. Aorta median HUs demonstrated five times more variability in contrast-enhanced exams compared to that in non-contrast-enhanced exams., Conclusions: Patient-specific organ HUs can be measured from clinical datasets. The algorithm that was developed can be run on both contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced clinical datasets. The method can be applied to automatically extract image HU-contrast characteristics of clinical CT images, not captured in phantom data, whereby enabling quantification and optimization of image quality and contrast administration., (© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)