Search

Introduction: Synovial sarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in children. Guidelines regarding the adequate extent of resection margins and the role of re-resection are lacking. We sought to evaluate the adequate resection margin and the role of re-resection in predicting outcomes in children with synovial sarcomas., Methods: A cohort of 36 patients less than 18 years of age at diagnosis who were treated for localized synovial sarcoma at three tertiary pediatric hospitals between January 2004 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient and tumor demographics, treatment information, and margin status after surgical resection were collected from the medical record. Clinical, treatment, and surgical characteristics, as well as outcomes including hazard ratios (HRs), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared by resection margins group and re-resection status., Results: Patients in the R1 resection group were significantly more likely to relapse or die compared to patients in the R0 resection group. However, there was no significant difference in EFS (HR 0.52, p = 0.54) or OS (HR 1.56, p = 0.719) in R0 patients with less than 5 mm margins compared to R0 patients with more than 5 mm margins. Patients with R1 on initial or re-resection had significantly worse OS than patients who had R0 resection on initial or re-resection (HR = 10.12, p = 0.005)., Conclusion: This study re-affirms that R0 resection is an independent prognostic predictor of better OS/EFS in pediatric synovial sarcoma. Second, our study extends this finding to report negative margins on initial resection or re-resection is associated with better OS/EFS than positive margins on initial resection or re-resection. Lastly, we found that there is no difference in outcomes associated with re-resection or <5 mm margins for R0 patients, indicating that re-resection and <5 mm margins are acceptable if microscopic disease is removed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy in childhood. Relapse occurs in more than 50% of high-risk patients with a high mortality due to ineffective salvage therapies. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for relapsed HB and predictors of survival in a single tertiary referral center., Methods: A retrospective chart review showed 129 surgically treated HB patients from October 2004 to July 2020. Of the cohort, 22 patients presented with relapsed HB. Relapse was defined as re-appearance of malignancy after 4 weeks of normalized AFP and disappearance of all tumors on imaging., Results: Patients with relapsed HB had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 45.4% compared to 93.1% in those without relapse (p = 0.001). When comparing PRETEXT IV, microvascular invasion, metastatic disease, and age on multivariate logistic regression, only PRETEXT IV was an independent risk factor for relapsed HB with an OR of 2.39 (95% CI: 1.16-4.96; p = 0.019). Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal HB (12/19, 63.2%) was the most common histology of primary tumors while pure epithelial HB (13/15, 86.6%) was the most common relapsed histology. Combination of surgical and medical therapy for relapsed disease was predictive of survival with an HR of 16.3 (95% CI: 1.783-149.091; p = 0.013) compared to only chemotherapy., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that PRETEXT IV staging is an independent predictor of relapsed disease. The most common relapsed histology was epithelial, suggesting a potential selection or resistance of this component. Surgical resection is a critical component of multimodal therapy for relapsed HB., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)