1. Septic shock: Clinical indicators and implications to critical patient care.
- Author
-
Ramos Corrêa Pinto, Luciana, Azzolin, Karina de Oliveira, Lucena, Amália de Fátima, Moretti, Miriane M. S., Haas, Jaqueline S., Moraes, Rafael B., and Friedman, Gilberto
- Subjects
INTENSIVE care units ,STATISTICS ,KEY performance indicators (Management) ,ACADEMIC medical centers ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,CRITICALLY ill ,CROSS-sectional method ,CANCER chemotherapy ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,PATIENTS ,MANN Whitney U Test ,FISHER exact test ,ARTIFICIAL respiration ,T-test (Statistics) ,CLINICAL medicine ,MEDICAL records ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,LACTATES ,HYPOTHERMIA ,CHI-squared test ,HYPOTENSION ,DEATH ,DATA analysis software ,ODDS ratio ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,SEPTIC shock ,DISCHARGE planning ,DISEASE risk factors ,DISEASE complications - Abstract
Aims and Objective: To identify clinical indicators of septic shock in critical care patients. Background: The identification of clinical indicators of septic shock is relevant to avoid clinical deterioration of patients with sepsis. However, the recognition of these factors, especially by the nursing team, is still deficient and reinforces the need for studies that investigate the subject in different realities such as that of Brazil. Design: The study had a cross‐sectional design based on STROBE guidelines (see Appendix S1). Methods: A sample of 392 patients with sepsis or septic shock was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of a Brazilian university hospital. Data were collected from medical records of the Intrahospital Sepsis Combat Program referring to patients admitted between January 2018–January 2019. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, as well as information on the time from diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock to initiation of antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and discharge or death outcomes. Data were statically analysed. Results: Out of the total sample, 190 (49%) patients were admitted with septic shock. Clinical indicators of septic shock were hypotension, mechanical ventilation, lactate levels between 2.0–3.9 or >4, hypothermia <36°C, radiotherapy‐associated chemotherapy, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >3 and admittance through the emergency unit. Among patients with septic shock, 85 (44.7%) were discharged and 105 (55.2%) died in the intensive care unit. Conclusions: Patients with septic shock presented hyperlactataemia and greater organic dysfunction as clinical indicators when compared to patients with sepsis. Mechanical ventilation, chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased the risk of developing septic shock. Relevance to clinical practice: Our results can support the nursing team by providing the main clinical indicators of septic shock and contributing to the interprofessional team in the prevention of septic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF