1. A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.
- Author
-
Pollock, Alex, Campbell, Pauline, Deery, Ruth, Fleming, Mick, Rankin, Jean, Sloan, Graham, and Cheyne, Helen
- Subjects
ALLIED health personnel ,CINAHL database ,HEALTH ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,MEDICAL databases ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,MEDLINE ,MIDWIVES ,NURSES ,RESEARCH funding ,MIDWIFERY ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,BIBLIOGRAPHIC databases ,CLINICAL supervision ,AMED (Information retrieval system) - Abstract
Aim The aim of this study was to systematically review evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Background Since 1902 statutory supervision has been a requirement for UK midwives, but this is due to change. Evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses and allied health professions could inform a new model of clinical supervision for midwives. Design A systematic review with a contingent design, comprising a broad map of research relating to clinical supervision and two focussed syntheses answering specific review questions. Data sources Electronic databases were searched from 2005 - September 2015, limited to English-language peer-reviewed publications. Review methods Systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of clinical supervision were included in Synthesis 1. Primary research studies including a description of a clinical supervision intervention were included in Synthesis 2. Quality of reviews were judged using a risk of bias tool and review results summarized in tables. Data describing the key components of clinical supervision interventions were extracted from studies included in Synthesis 2, categorized using a reporting framework and a narrative account provided. Results Ten reviews were included in Synthesis 1; these demonstrated an absence of convincing empirical evidence and lack of agreement over the nature of clinical supervision. Nineteen primary studies were included in Synthesis 2; these highlighted a lack of consistency and large variations between delivered interventions. Conclusion Despite insufficient evidence to directly inform the selection and implementation of a framework, the limited available evidence can inform the design of a new model of clinical supervision for UK-based midwives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF