1. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation and patient perceptions on the usage of technologies in cardiac rehabilitation: A cross‐sectional study.
- Author
-
Chong, Mei Sin, Sit, Janet Wing Hung, Choi, Kai Chow, Suhaimi, Anwar, and Chair, Sek Ying
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,STATISTICS ,HEALTH services accessibility ,SOCIAL support ,ACADEMIC medical centers ,CROSS-sectional method ,FUNCTIONAL status ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,INTERVIEWING ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,CRONBACH'S alpha ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CARDIAC rehabilitation ,MENTAL depression ,CORONARY artery disease ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,HEALTH behavior ,HOSPITAL care ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,TECHNOLOGY ,ANXIETY ,STATISTICAL correlation ,DATA analysis software ,CONTENT analysis ,ELECTRONIC health records ,COMORBIDITY - Abstract
Aims and Objectives: The study aimed to identify factors associated with participation in Phase II cardiac rehabilitation and to assess patient perceptions towards the usage of technologies in cardiac rehabilitation. Background: Despite efforts to promote utilisation of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), participation among patients remains unsatisfactory. Little is known of patient decision to participate Phase II CR in a multi‐ethnic country. Design: A cross‐sectional study design. Methods: A consecutive sampling of 240 patients with coronary heart disease completed Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE‐Q) II, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS). Results: Seventy per cent of patients (mean age 60.5 [SD = 10.6] years, 80.8% male) participated in phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Self‐driving to cardiac rehabilitation centres, higher barriers in perceived need/health care and logistical factors were significantly associated with decreased odds of participation. Patients with more barriers from comorbidities/functional status, higher perceived social support from friends, and anxiety were more likely to participate. Chinese and Indians were less likely to participate when compared with Malays. More than 80% of patients used both home and mobile broadband internet, and 72.9% of them would accept the usage of technologies, especially educational videos, instant messenger, and video calls to partially replace the face‐to‐face, centre‐based cardiac rehabilitation approach. Conclusion: Several barriers were associated with non‐participation in phase II cardiac rehabilitation. With the high perceived acceptance of technology usage in cardiac rehabilitation, home‐based and hybrid cardiac rehabilitation may represent potential solutions to improve participation. Relevance to clinical practice: By addressing the barriers to cardiac rehabilitation, patients are more likely to be ready to adopt health behaviour changes and adhere to the cardiac rehabilitation programme. The high perceived acceptance of using technologies in cardiac rehabilitation may provide insights into new delivery models that can improve and overcome barriers to participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF