Search

Background/objectives: The practice of palliative radiation therapy (RT) is based on extrapolation from adult literature. We evaluated patterns of pediatric palliative RT to describe regimens used to identify opportunity for future pediatric-specific clinical trials., Design/methods: Six international institutions with pediatric expertise completed a 122-item survey evaluating patterns of palliative RT for patients ≤21 years old from 2010 to 2015. Two institutions use proton RT. Palliative RT was defined as treatment with the goal of symptom control or prevention of immediate life-threatening progression., Results: Of 3,225 pediatric patients, 365 (11%) were treated with palliative intent to a total of 427 disease sites. Anesthesia was required in 10% of patients. Treatment was delivered to metastatic disease in 54% of patients. Histologies included neuroblastoma (30%), osteosarcoma (18%), leukemia/lymphoma (12%), rhabdomyosarcoma (12%), medulloblastoma/ependymoma (12%), Ewing sarcoma (8%), and other (8%). Indications included pain (43%), intracranial symptoms (23%), respiratory compromise (14%), cord compression (8%), and abdominal distention (6%). Sites included nonspine bone (35%), brain (16% primary tumors, 6% metastases), abdomen/pelvis (15%), spine (12%), head/neck (9%), and lung/mediastinum (5%). Re-irradiation comprised 16% of cases. Techniques employed three-dimensional conformal RT (41%), intensity-modulated RT (23%), conventional RT (26%), stereotactic body RT (6%), protons (1%), electrons (1%), and other (2%). The most common physician-reported barrier to consideration of palliative RT was the concern about treatment toxicity (83%)., Conclusion: There is significant diversity of practice in pediatric palliative RT. Combined with ongoing research characterizing treatment response and toxicity, these data will inform the design of forthcoming clinical trials to establish effective regimens and minimize treatment toxicity for this patient population., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Despite the frequent use and radiation exposure of computed tomography (CT) scans, there is little information on patterns of CT use and their utility in the management of pediatric patients with fever and neutropenia (FN). We examined the contribution of either the commonly employed pan-CT (multiple anatomical locations) or targeted CT (single location) scanning to identify possible infectious etiologies in this challenging clinical scenario. Procedure Pediatric patients with an underlying malignancy admitted for fever (temperature ≥ 38.3 °C) and an absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/μL from 2003-2009 were included. Risk factors associated with utilization, results, and effects on clinical management of CT scans were identified. Results Charts for 635 admissions for FN from 263 patients were reviewed. Overall, 139 (22%) admissions (93 individuals) had at least one scan. Of 188 scans, 103 (55%) were pan-scans. Changes in management were most strongly associated with the identification of evidence consistent with infection (OR = 12.64, 95% CI: 5.05-31.60, P < 0.001). Seventy-eight (41%) of all CT scans led to a change in clinical management, most commonly relating to use of antibiotic (N = 41, 53%) or antifungal/antiviral medications (N = 33, 42%). The odds of a change in clinical management did not differ for those receiving a pan-scan compared to those receiving a targeted scan (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.61-2.46; P = 0.57). Conclusions When CT is clinically indicated, it is important for clinicians to strongly consider utilizing a targeted scan to reduce radiation exposure to patients as well as to decrease costs without compromising care., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)