Search

Background: Several studies have shown that the intensity of treatment in Ewing sarcoma has an impact on outcome. The present trial tested the non-inferiority of intensive, shorter, induction chemotherapy (25 weeks total treatment time) compared to the standard treatment (37 weeks) in non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) at onset., Procedure: This national, multicenter, parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, phase III trial was conducted in 14 specialized hospitals in Italy. Patients aged 2-40 years with newly diagnosed localized ES were randomized to receive four courses of induction therapy (one every 21 days) either with a standard arm (Arm A) or with an intensive arm (Arm B). For consolidation therapy, good responders (GRs) in Arm A received nine courses (37 weeks), while Arm B patients received five courses (25 weeks). Poor responders for both arms received four courses followed by high-dose busulfan/melphalan + autologous stem cell rescue. Follow-up was 5 years., Results: In the study period 2009-2018, 274 patients with ES at onset were screened, 248 were eligible, 15 refused randomization, and 233 were randomized (Arm A: 113; Arm B: 120). Median age was 14 years. Arm B was not inferior to Arm A: 5-year EFS was 77.5% and 71.6%, respectively (HR vs. Arm A: 0.74, 90% CI: 0.49-1.14). GRs were 54.9% in Arm A and 62.5% in Arm B. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular Grade ≥3 toxicities had higher frequencies in Arm B., Conclusions: Intensive induction therapy showed non-inferiority in 5-year EFS when compared with the standard induction therapy. Higher toxicity was reported in Arm B with similar outcome, counterbalanced in GRs with a shorter treatment plan., Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT02063022., (© 2025 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Patients with PAX3/7-FOXO1 fusion-negative rhabdomyosarcomas (fnRMS) harbouring the rare L122R MYOD1 mutation have significantly poorer prognosis than other fnRMS. We undertook a detailed clinicopathological evaluation of a cohort of patients with MYOD1 mutated fnRMS in order to improve risk stratification and treatment options., Procedure: Histological, mutational and clinical data from a cohort of patients with MYOD1 mutant RMS treated in Europe were analysed., Results: Thirty-two cases with mutant MYOD1 RMS were identified from patients enrolled in sequential European rhabdomyosarcoma clinical trials from 1992 to 2022 (n = 22) and non-trial cohorts (n = 10). Thirty cases had the recurrent L122R missense mutation, one case harboured a K124E mutation and one case had a truncating mutation (S63X). Increased MyoD1 and reduced MYF4 immunostaining were consistent features of MYOD1 L122R -mutated RMS. Applying the risk stratification of the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 trial, among 20 localised RMS cases that could be assigned a risk category, one was Very High Risk, 13 were High Risk and six were Standard Risk. Eight patients had distant metastases at diagnosis. Of the 25 patients with adequate clinical follow-up data, 15/25 (60%) patients had an event at a median time of 9 months (12/15 included failure of local control) and 13/25 (52%) died of disease., Conclusion: This MYOD1 mutant cohort demonstrates increased MYOD and reduced MYF4 immunostaining, high risk of local failure and poor survival in agreement with other studies. Increased treatment intensity and improved local control should be considered for these patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In the era of big data, young patients may be overwhelmed by artificial intelligence-based tools, like chatbots. Five clinical experts were asked to evaluate the performance of the most currently used chatbots in providing information on a rare cancer affecting young people, like rhabdomyosarcoma. Generally speaking, despite their high performance in giving general information about the disease, these chatbots were considered by the experts to be inadequate in providing suggestions on cancer treatments and specialized centers, and also lacking in "sensitivity." Efforts are planned by the pediatric oncology community to improve the quality of data used to train these tools., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Though the prognosis for pediatric patients with localised synovial sarcoma (SS) is generally good, the chances of being cured after relapse are limited. This study describes a retrospective multi-institutional series of relapsing SS patients treated at six selected European referral centers for pediatric sarcoma., Patients and Methods: The study included 41 patients <21 years with relapsing SS, treated between 2002 and 2022. The analysis included patient's characteristics at first diagnosis, first-line treatments, clinical findings at relapse, and second-line treatment modalities., Results: The first relapse occurred within 3-132 months (median 18 months) after first diagnosis and was local in 34%, metastatic in 54%, and both in 12%. Treatment at first relapse included surgery in 56% of cases, radiotherapy in 34%, and systemic therapy in 88%. In all, 36 patients received second-line medical treatment, that was chemotherapy in 32 cases (with 10 different regimens) and targeted therapy in four. No patient was included in an early-phase clinical trial as second-line therapy-line therapy. Overall response rate was 42%. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 12 months, postrelapse 5-year EFS was 15.8%. Median overall survival (OS) was 30 months, postrelapse 5-year OS was 22.2%. At the Cox's multivariable regression analysis, OS was significantly associated with time and type of relapse., Conclusion: Pediatric patients with relapsed SS have a poor prognosis and generally receive an individualized approach, due to the lack of a uniform standardized approach. New comprehensive strategies are needed to improve the knowledge on the biologic landscape of SS and develop tailored prospective clinical trials., (© 2024 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Malignant ectomesenchymoma (MEM) is an extremely rare soft tissue tumor typical of young children, currently included in the category of skeletal muscle malignancies and characterized by a neuroblastic component. This study describes a series of 10 patients prospectively registered in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) database Of the 10 cases, seven had an initial local diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma. All patients received chemotherapy according to rhabdomyosarcoma strategy, four had radiotherapy. Overall, six patients were alive in first remission, two in second remission and one after second tumor. Only the patient with initially metastatic tumor died of disease., (© 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: CWS/RMS-96 was an international multicenter trial with randomization between two therapy arms of the standard four-drug therapy (vincristine, ifosfamide, adriamycin, dactinomycin [VAIA]) versus an intensified six-drug regimen (carboplatin, epirubicin, vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and etoposide [CEVAIE]) for high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES), and undifferentiated sarcoma (UDS) in children, adolescents, and young adults aiming to improve their survival. Intensified chemotherapy with CEVAIE did not improve outcome., Methods: Patients younger than 21 years with a previously untreated localized HR-RMS, EES, and UDS were enrolled from Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) centers in Germany, Austria, Poland, Switzerland, and from Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (STSC) centers. Randomization (1:1) to receive either 9 × 21 days cycles of VAIA or CEVAIE was performed separately in CWS and STSC. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (32-44.8 Gy) was added at week 9-12 according to histology and response to chemotherapy. A secondary microscopically complete nonmutilating resection was performed if possible. Primary endpoints were response to chemotherapy, event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Five hundred fifty-seven patients (HR-RMS: n = 416, EES and UDS: n = 141) underwent randomization: VAIA (n = 273) or CEVAIE (n = 284). Radiotherapy was given to 70% of patients in both groups. A secondary resection was performed in 47% and 48% patients, respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS for the VAIA and CEVAIE treatment arms were 59.8% and 60.8% (p = .89), and 74.2% and 68.3% (p = .16), respectively. No differences in response, toxicity, or second malignancies emerged in the two groups., Conclusion: The use of an intensified regimen failed to show a significant improvement in tumor response and outcome of patients with localized HR-RMS, EES, and UDS., (© 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Procedure: The survival of children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has gradually improved as a result of the adoption of multidisciplinary treatments. Dedicated skills and facilities are indispensable and more readily available at reference centers. In this study, we examined the role of centers' experience (based on the number of patients treated) in their management of patients with RMS., Methods: We analyzed 342 patients with localized RMS enrolled in the European RMS 2005 protocol from October 2005 to December 2016 at 31 Italian centers that are part of the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (STSC). We grouped the centers by the number of patients each one enrolled (Group 1: >40; Group 2: <40 and >10; and Group 3: <10), and compared a number of indicators to assess the appropriateness of patients' diagnostic workup and treatment and their survival., Results: Overall, 74.6% of patients were treated at 10 centers, and only three of them classifiable as high-volume centers. Only minor differences emerged between the three patient groups in terms of diagnostic investigations and treatment modalities. Survival was similar in the three groups. Approximately, one in four children treated at the centers in Groups 2 and 3 traveled to another center for surgery or radiotherapy., Conclusion: Patients treated at STSC centers with different amounts of experience had similar results in terms of survival. This is attributable to all centers in the network adhering to protocol recommendations and receiving the STSC's support on diagnostics and multidisciplinary treatments for RMS., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: The presence of pleural effusion or ascites at the time of diagnosis is generally considered a poor prognostic factor for children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and treatment is usually intensified despite the fact that there are no published studies to support this decision. We investigated the prognostic role of the presence of pleural effusion or ascites at diagnosis in patients with localized RMS consecutively enrolled in the Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee protocols over a 30-year period., Methods: We reviewed the radiological reports at diagnosis of 150 children with supradiaphragmatic and infradiaphragmatic RMS, noting any presence of effusion and its extent (minimal, moderate, or massive). All patients received intensive chemotherapy, surgery, and standard or hyperfractionated radiotherapy., Results: Effusion was identified in 32 children (21.3%), 14 with pleural effusion and 18 with ascites. As for its extent, 13 children presented with minimal, 12 with moderate, and 7 with massive effusion. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 49.8% (confidence interval [CI] 31.7-65.5) and 49.5% (CI 40-58.2) for patients with and without effusion, respectively (P = .5). When only patients with moderate or massive effusion were considered, however, their PFS was 36.8% (CI 16.5-57.5) versus 51.2% (CI 42.2-59.5) in patients with minimal or no effusion (P = .01). On the whole, patients with pleural effusion had a very poor outcome with a 5-year PFS of 35.7% (CI 13-59.4)., Conclusions: The presence of moderate or massive effusion seems to be an unfavorable prognostic factor in children with RMS, and justifies their inclusion in experimental studies., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) occurring at nonparameningeal head and neck (NPM-HN) sites carries a better prognosis than parameningeal RMS and some other sites. We analyzed the treatments administered and results obtained in patients with localized NPM-HN RMS, included in the protocols coordinated by the Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (STSC), in an effort to identify prognostic factors that could facilitate the tailoring of treatment., Methods: Sixty-six patients up to 18 years of age with previously untreated, localized NPM-HN RMS were prospectively registered in three consecutive protocols: RMS79, RMS88, and RMS96. Primary surgery was recommended when complete tumor resection was deemed feasible without mutilations. In other cases, only a biopsy was performed, followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery and/or radiotherapy (RT)., Results: NPM-HN RMS showed favorable characteristics: 72.7% were <5 cm, 72.7% were T1, and 80.3% were N0. With a median follow-up of 16 years (range 7-27), the 10-year progression-free survival and overall survival for the whole group were 65.1% (confidence interval [CI]: 52.3-75.3) and 74.2% (CI: 61.8-83.1). Progressive improvement has been seen in the successive protocols. Age and RT emerged as independent prognostic factors. The group of young children (age

Background: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is one of the most common nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas encountered in pediatric age, and it is generally characterized by poor outcome, particularly for relapsing patients., Materials and Methods: This study considered 73 patients <21 years of age with relapsing MPNST observed among 120 patients enrolled in Italian pediatric protocols from 1979 to 2004. With the aim of possibly establishing a risk-adapted stratification, patients' outcome was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis based on clinical features at onset, first-line treatments, clinical findings at the time of first relapse, and second-line treatments., Results: The time to relapse ranged from 1 to 204 months after first diagnosis (median 7 months). The first relapse event was mainly local. At the time of our analysis, nine patients were alive in remission. The median overall survival after first relapse was 11 months, and the survival rates were 39.2% at 1 year and 15.8% at 5 years. The factors revealing the greatest impact on prognosis were as follows: initial tumor invasiveness, time of relapse, and achievement of a secondary complete remission (which was related to the feasibility of radical surgery)., Conclusions: Our study confirmed the unsatisfactory prognosis for pediatric patients with relapsing MPNST and pointed to a risk-adapted stratification model for the purposes of deciding second-line treatments. For the time being, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be the only effective salvage treatment and should be recommended. New therapeutic approaches are under evaluation with a view to improving current outcomes., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) may rarely occur in visceral tissues, and little is known about their clinical history. The present study retrospectively analyzed a group of patients prospectively registered in Italian pediatric protocols conducted between 1979 and 2004., Methods: Inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: a pathological diagnosis of "adult-type NRSTS," arising at visceral sites (lung-pleurae, liver, kidney, and mesentery-bowel); age under 18 years; no previous treatment except for primary surgery; available clinical data; and written consent., Results: Thirty cases with visceral NRSTS were collected and analyzed. Sites of origin were as follows: mesentery-bowel in 12 cases, lung-pleurae in 11, liver in 5, and kidney in 2. According to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) surgical grouping system, patients were classified as follows: nine IRS group I, three group II, 12 group III, and six group IV. Patients were treated with a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, according to their characteristics. For the series as a whole, the 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 33.3% and 40.0%, respectively. The IRS group (reflecting the feasibility of initial complete resection) emerged as the main prognostic factor. Survival rates also correlated with tumor size and local invasiveness, histological subtype, and tumor sites (the worst outcome was seen for tumors arising in the lung and pleurae)., Conclusions: This study confirmed that visceral NRSTS are aggressive tumors carrying a worse prognosis than pediatric NRSTS arising in soft tissues of the extremities. Local treatment remains the main challenge for these tumors., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: To define the mortality and the current impact of the H1N1 pandemic in pediatric hematology-oncology centers, we performed a specific survey., Procedure: Pharyngeal swabs from patients with fevers of unknown origin, flu-like symptoms or bronchopneumonia were screened for H1N1 using PCR., Results: Sixty-two patients with documented H1N1 infection were reported: 16 had recently stopped therapy, 2 were at the diagnosis stage, and 44 were receiving therapy. The clinical course was severe (requiring ICU admission) in only 1 patient, moderate (requiring hospital admission) in 38, and mild in the remaining 23 (37%), treated as outpatients. While none of the patients died of H1N1-related complications, two patients died of progressive cancer; in all of the remaining cases, symptoms resolved within 11 days. The clinical course was complicated by respiratory distress or bronchopneumonia in 10 cases. Oseltamivir was given to 82% of patients. Chemotherapy was temporarily withdrawn in 54% of cases for a median time of 21 days (range, 4-43 days)., Conclusion: H1N1 infection in children with cancer was not reported as the cause of death in any case but resulted in reduced intensity of anti-cancer therapy., ((c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)