Search

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of ESKD prevalence, the following key messages were retained. While chronic kidney disease affects all age groups, there always are more patients to treat in the older age groups, with a median age of 71.1 years (IIQ 60.3-80.0) under dialysis and 58.7 years (IIQ 47.4-68.3) under renal transplant. Despite an increase in transplant activity and improved survival of grafts, the gap between the number of dialysis patients and transplant patients at the end of each year is only moderately reduced. There has been a moderate decrease in the proportion of in-centre haemodialysis that is explained by a significant increase in medicalised dialysis units (out-centre haemodialysis) and a decrease in self-care haemodialysis. Finally, a stable home-based care has been observed despite the ministerial incentives and the recommendations of the French-speaking scientific society (SFNDT-white paper).

Acute renal failure (ARF) in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) often evolves in a context of multiple organ failure, which explains the high mortality rate and increase treatment needs. Among, two modalities of renal replacement therapy, peritoneal dialysis (PD) was the first modality used for the treatment of ARF in the 1950s. Today, while PD is generalized for chronic renal failure treatment, its use in the ICU is limited, particularly, due to the advent of new hemodialysis techniques and the development of continuous replacement therapy. Recently, a renewed interest in the use of PD in patients with ARF has manifested in several emerging countries (Brazil, Vietnam). A systematic review in 2013 showed a similar mortality in ARF patients having PD (58%) and those treated by hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration/hemofiltration (56.1%). In the International society of peritoneal dialysis (ISPD)'s guideline (2013), PD may be used in adult ARF as the other blood extracorporeal epuration technics (recommendation with grade 1B). PD is the preferred method in cardiorenal syndromes, in frailty patients with hemodynamic instability and those lacking vascular access; finally PD is also an option in elderly and patients with bleeding tendency. In industrial countries, high volume automated PD with a flexible catheter (usually Tenckhoff) is advocated., (Copyright © 2016 Association Société de néphrologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

The optimal method to assess the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis therapies is controversial. Today, the adequacy must not be considered as a number or a concept assessed only by two parameters (total KT/V urea and total solute clearance) but defined by many more items. In the absence of data, based on theoretical considerations, the reanalysis of the CANUSA study showed that renal kidney function, rather than peritoneal clearance, was associated with improved survival. Residual renal function is considered as a major predictor factor of cardiovascular mortality. Results of this reanalysis were supported by the adequacy data in ADEMEX, EAPOS and ANZDATA studies. Therefore, clinical assessment plays a major role in PD adequacy. The management of fluid balance, the regular monitoring of malnutrition, the control of mineral metabolism and particularly the glucose load, considered as the "corner-stone" of the system, are the main points to be considered in the adequacy of PD patients. The essential goal is to minimize glucose load by glucose-sparing strategies in order to reduce the neoangiogenesis of the peritoneal membrane., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

The frequency of transfers from peritoneal dialysis to haemodialysis secondary to the catheter-related complications has been estimated between eight to 20% depending the countries. Therefore, it is recommended that the insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters be made by competent and experienced operators. Indeed, despite the development of new insertion techniques and the availability of new sophisticated catheters, the major prognostic factor remains the quality of the surgical procedure and the postoperative care. As regards the choice between various catheters, there is no consensus for the superiority of one in comparison with others. However it should be noted that a catheter survival rate from 80 to 90% at one year is a recognized index of quality.

In all countries, the number of diabetic patients with end stage renal disease is growing. The question is whether this mode of therapy is the most appropriate for uremic diabetics. The superiority of any type replacement renal therapy (RRT) over another cannot be unequivocally proven in the absence of a truly random long-term prospective study, which for obvious reasons, has not and probably will not be carried out. Today, the decision on the final choice is indeed dependant on patient preferences, medical factors, physician's biais, local facilities and financial aspects. If in most centers, survival analysis results performed in Europe and in North America regarding diabetic patients RRT are conflicting, the interpretation of comparisons of survival rates published in different studies must be treated with great caution. Nevertheless, if diabetic patients survival is significantly lower than that of non diabetic patients independently of the technique chosen there is no argument to assess that survival at 2 years of diabetic patients aged less 55 years is better on PD than on HD. There is no argument to assess that survival at 2 years of diabetic patients aged more 55 years is better or less appropriate on PD than on HD, excepted in the North America where survival seems to be less appropriate on PD. The present report summarizes the major advantages and drawbacks of the PD method in insulin treated diabetic patients.