Search

The article focuses on Anker Jensen's pioneering sociolinguistic study of the linguistic situation in Aaby, Denmark, in 1898, exploring a quantitative approach and the outcomes of his research. Topics include the life and work of Anker Jensen, his analytical methodology, and a translated presentation of his original study, including minor stylistic adjustments to aid modern readers without altering the essence of the Danish text.

Copyright of Historiographia Linguistica is the property of John Benjamins Publishing Co. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper examines the Danish language of aesthetics from the perspective of four untranslatable adjectives: pæn, flot, dejlig, and lækker. These words are frequent and salient in everyday discourses, and as such they shed light on Danish "folk" conceptions. From the perspective of Lexical Anthropology and NSM Semantics, each of the words are explored and explicated in order to shed light on the ways in which Danish discourse organize positive aesthetic experiences. Sensitive to polysemy, and the variety of lexicogrammatical frames in which the words occur, the paper provides a high-resolution analyses of the "something ADJ frame" which enables discourses of design, food, and art. Based on lexical semantic evidence, the paper locates two themes in Danish discourse: "aesthetic normality" and "ordinary hedonism" which seem to act as cognitive axes around which discourses revolve. The paper argues that words hold the key to understanding the diversity of aesthetic cultures, and that untranslatables in particular, allow for a deep emic understanding of how local configurations of seeing, feeling, touching, and thinking are constituted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Danish word lige ['li:∂] is a highly culture-specific discourse particle. English translations sometimes render it as "please," but this kind of functional translation is motivated solely by the expectation that, in English, one has to 'say please'. In the Danish universe of meaning, there is in fact no direct equivalent of anything like English please, German bitte, or similar constructs in other European languages. Consequently, Danish speakers cannot 'say please', and Danish children cannot 'say the magic word'. However, lige is in its own way a magic word, performing a different kind of pragmatic magic that has almost been left unstudied because it does not correlate well with any of the major Anglointernational research questions such as "how to express politeness" or "how to make a request." This paper analyzes the semantics of lige in order to shed light on the peculiarities of Danish ethnopragmatics. It is demonstrated not only that Danish lige does a different semantic job than English please, but also that please-based and lige-based interactions are bound to different interpretations of social life and interpersonal relations, and reflect differing cultural values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we study the cultural semantics of the personhood construct mind in Trinidadian creole. We analyze the lexical semantics of the word and explore the wider cultural meanings of the concept in contrastive comparison with the Anglo concept. Our analysis demonstrates that the Anglo concept is a cognitively oriented construct with a semantic configuration based on 'thinking' and 'knowing', whereas the Trinidadian mind is a moral concept configured around perceptions of 'good' and 'bad'. We further explore the Trinidadian moral discourse of bad mind and good mind, and articulate a set of cultural scripts for the cultural values linked with personhood in the Trinidadian context. Taking a postcolonial approach to the semantics of personhood, we critically engage with Anglo-international discourses of the mind, exposing the conceptual stranglehold of the colonial language (i.e., English) and its distorting semantic grip on global discourse. We argue that creole categories of values and personhood -- such as the Trinidadian concept of mind -- provide a new venue for critical mind studies as well as for new studies in creole semantics and cultural diversity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to a new global narrative, the Danes are the happiest people in the world. This paper takes a critical look at the international media discourse of "happiness", tracing its roots and underlying assumptions. Equipped with the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach to linguistic and cultural analysis, a new in-depth semantic analysis of the story of "Danish happiness" is developed. It turns out that the allegedly happiest people on earth do not (usually) talk and think about life in terms of "happiness", but rather through a different set of cultural concepts and scripts, all guided by the Danish cultural keyword lykke. The semantics of lykke is explicated along with two related concepts livsglæde, roughly, 'life joy' and livslyst 'life pleasure', and based on semantic and ethnopragmatic analysis, a set of lykke-related cultural scripts is provided. With new evidence from Danish, it is argued that global Anglo-International "happiness discourse" misrepresents local meanings and values, and that the one-sided focus on "happiness across nations" in the social sciences is in dire need of crosslinguistic confrontation. The paper calls for a post-happiness turn in the study of words and values across languages, and for a new critical awareness of linguistic and conceptual biases in Anglo-international discourse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]