1. Evaluation of the Success of Conventional and Biological Restorative Treatment Approaches for Caries in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study.
- Author
-
Undre MI, Chunawala Y, Choubey S, Shaikh MN, Ershad A, and Qureshi S
- Abstract
Background: In order to compare the clinical and radiographic success of three treatment modalities-conventional restoration (CR), nonrestorative caries treatment (NRCT), and Hall technique (HT), with a 3-month to 1 year follow-up in deciduous molars with occlusal or proximal carious lesions., Design: Children between the ages of 5 and 8 were chosen for the study, having a total of 120 teeth. They were split into three groups, each with 40 participants-CR, HT, and NRCT. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Data were statistically analyzed., Results: The Chi-squared value and p -value were found to be insignificant when comparing clinical and radiographic ratings of all three groups at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month intervals., Conclusion: Hall technique (HT) performed better than CR. NRCT was more acceptable to patients than CR., How to Cite This Article: Undre MI, Chunawala Y, Choubey S, et al. Evaluation of the Success of Conventional and Biological Restorative Treatment Approaches for Caries in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):591-597., Competing Interests: Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None, (Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF