Search

Background: It has been proposed that multisite atrial pacing (MSAp) restores atrial electrical activation and prevents atrial fibrillation recurrence; however, single-site Bachmann's bundle pacing (BBp) has also been reported as providing effective atrial resynchronization. Coronary sinus pacing (CSp) leads to reversed impulse propagation within the atria. Methods and Results: Acute echocardiographic examination was performed in 15 healthy subjects, and in 25 patients with sinus node dysfunction and recurrent atrial fibrillation during MSAp (atrial leads in the BB area and CS ostium), and single-site BBp and CSp. Regional atrial synchrony was assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography. Pacing mode had no effect on stroke volume. CSp resulted in right atrial filling diminution, shortened mechanical atrioventricular delay in the right heart and diminished right ventricular inflow. The magnitude of reversion of the physiological right-to-left atrial contraction sequence was most prominent during CSp (15±11, 12±23, 3±21, 42±23 ms; control, MSAp, BBp, CSp respectively, P

Background: Optimal right ventricular (RV) pacing site in patients referred for permanent cardiac pacing remains controversial. A prospective randomized trial was done to compare long-term effect of permanent RV apex (RVA) vs RV outflow tract (RVOT) pacing on the all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Methods and Results: A total of 122 consecutive patients (70 men, 69 ±11 years), with standard pacing indications were randomized to RVA (66 patients) or RVOT (56 patients) ventricular lead placement. After the 10-year follow-up period the mortality data were summarized on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. During the long-term follow-up, 31 patients from the RVA group died vs 24 patients in the RVOT group (hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-1.65; P=0.89). There were 10 cardiovascular deaths in the RVA and 12 in the RVOT group (HR, 1.04; 95%CI, 0.45-2.41; P=0.93). There were no differences in the all-cause or cardiovascular mortality between the pacing sites after adjustment for age, gender, arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association class and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Conclusions: The RVOT provides no additional benefit in terms of long-term survival over RVA pacing. (Circ J 2009; 73: 1812-1819)