Search

Introduction: About one-third of breast and ovarian carcinoma patients have circulating antibodies reactive with polymorphic epithelial mucin (MUC1), either free or bound to immune complexes. While the presence of these immune complexes has prognostic significance in breast cancer patients, the significance of free MUC1 antibodies is less clear. The objective of this study was to develop a reliable assay for the accurate determination of circulating free antibodies to MUC1., Material and Methods: We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (PEM.CIg) employing a 60 mer peptide (a triple tandem repeat sequence of the MUC1 peptide core) conjugated to bovine serum albumin and peroxidase-labeled antihuman immunoglobulin G or M antibodies. The assay was standardized and its analytical performance evaluated. A total of 492 serum samples were obtained from 40 healthy men, from 201 healthy women (including 55 women without a history of pregnancy and 45 pregnant women), and (before primary treatment) from 62 benign breast tumor patients and 190 breast cancer patients. MUC1 serum levels were determined with commercial CA 15-3 tests., Results: Circulating antibodies to MUC1 are present both in healthy subjects and in breast cancer patients. The within- and between-assay coefficients of variation were, respectively, 2 and 12% for the IgG determinations and 1.2 and 3% for the IgM determinations. Correlation coefficients for serially diluted serum samples ranged from 0.9998 to 0.9920 for IgG and from 0.9996 to 0.9818 for IgM determinations. The reactivity of serum samples was partially blocked by the addition of various MUC1 peptides and by MUC1 mucin. The inhibiting effect of modified 60 mer peptides suggests the presence of antibodies directed to more than one epitope., Conclusions: The PEM. CIg assay is a reliable ELISA for measuring free MUC1 antibodies in serum. We are in the process of relating the results obtained in the breast cancer group to disease outcome to evaluate its prognostic significance. In addition, the assay may become a useful tool for vaccine therapy monitoring.

In this report, we evaluate the stability of urinary gonadotropin peptide (UGP), an urinary tumor marker for trophoblastic malignancies, which is also promising for other types of cancer. The concentrations were independent of the duration of storage (p > 0.1), but the mean difference between UGP values for samples stored at 4 degrees C and those kept at room temperature is 5.5% (p < 0.002), with the higher values for refrigerated samples. We conclude that UGP is stable at room temperature, allowing mailing of urine samples. Refrigerated (4 degrees C) samples show slightly increased values. However, this will have no clinical relevance in monitoring cancer patients.

The utility of the lipid-associated sialic acid (LASA or LSA) test as a serum marker for malignancy is reviewed. The name LASA or LSA test is confusing because it suggests that only or mainly lipid-bound sialic acid is measured. In reality, glycoprotein-bound sialic acid is determined predominantly. The assay appears to have a particularly high positivity rate in leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, melanoma, sarcoma, advanced ovarian carcinoma and oropharyngeal tumors, suggesting that LASA may serve as a valuable marker in these malignancies. As a consequence of the rise of sialic acid-rich acute-phase proteins, such as alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, in inflammatory diseases the specificity of LASA and therefore its diagnostic accuracy is low. LASA can be useful for monitoring cancer patients during treatment, especially in combination with other tumor markers.

In the search for a method to facilitate the preoperative discrimination of ovarian carcinomas from colorectal carcinomas serum levels of 6 tumor markers were measured in 47 patients presenting with ovarian cancer and compared to levels found in 24 female patients with advanced, untreated colorectal cancer. The markers studied were CA 125, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CEA and two recently developed mucin markers, CA M29 and CA M26. Levels of CA 125, CA 15.3, CEA and CA M29 showed significant differences between both groups. In predicting ovarian cancer, sensitivity was highest for CA 125 at 94% (35 U/ml cutoff level). However, the specificity of CA 125 was at 71% low. Specificity increased significantly by using a combination of a CA 125-positive score (greater than 35 U/ml) and a simultaneous negative CEA score (less than or equal to 5 ng/ml) (specificity 100%, sensitivity 81%). A CA 125/CEA serum ratio greater than 25 resulted in the highest discriminative power with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 91% resulting in an overall test accuracy of 94%. It is concluded that the serum tumor markers used, especially a combination of CA 125 and CEA, are helpful in the preoperative differential diagnosis between adenocarcinomas of ovarian and colorectal origin.