1. A Comparison of 3 Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Articular Cartilage
- Author
-
Léa Pourchet, Christophe A. Marquette, Damien Loeuille, Océane Messaoudi, Pierre Gillet, Astrid Pinzano, Christel Henrionnet, Ingénierie Moléculaire et Physiopathologie Articulaire (IMoPA), Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Chimie et Biochimie Moléculaires et Supramoléculaires (ICBMS), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA Lyon), and Université de Lyon-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-École Supérieure Chimie Physique Électronique de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
3D bioprinting ,business.industry ,law ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Medicine ,Articular cartilage ,business ,Biomedical engineering ,law.invention - Abstract
International audience; Background: 3D printing has become a promising tool for cartilage engineering, combining 3D deposition of cells seeded in supporting biomaterials. Objective: Our goal was to evaluate the chondrogenic properties of three different bioinks, seeded with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (bMSCs). Methods: The three different tested bioinks are seeded with 2 × 106 cells/mL bMSCs. The bioink#1 is composed of gelatin, fibrinogen, and very low viscosity alginate. The bioink#2 has the same composition, excepted for the alginate that is a low viscosity one. The bioink#3 is manufactured by CELLINK®. The cartilaginous substitutes were cultivated for 28 days in the presence of ITS vs TGF-ß1. The extracellular matrix synthesis is evaluated at D28 by histology (Hematoxylin-Eosin-Saffron & Alcian Blue) and immunostaining (type II collagen). Results: The bioink#1 better promoted type II collagen synthesis, although the three bioink were equipotent in terms of proteoglycan content. Despite its universal characteristics, the bioink#3 failed to encourage the hyaline-like matrix synthesis. Conclusion: The bioink#1 containing gelatin, fibrinogen, and very low viscosity seems to be the fittest of the three bio-inks to obtain a cartilaginous substitute presenting a remarkable matrix synthesis. This study confirms the importance of the choice of bioink for cartilage engineering.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF