Search

In many countries, the management of cancer patients must be discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). These meetings have been introduced to provide a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to cancer care. However, the benefits of MTBs are now being challenged because there are a lot of cases and not enough time to discuss all the of them. During the evaluation of the guideline-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) of the DESIREE project, we found that for some clinical cases, the system did not produce recommendations. We assumed that these cases were complex clinical cases and needed deeper MTB discussions. In this work, we trained and tested several machine learning and deep learning algorithms on a labelled sample of 298 breast cancer patient summaries, to predict the complexity of a breast cancer clinical case. XGboost and multi-layer perceptron were the models with the best result, with an F1 score of 83%.

The guideline-based decision support system (GL-DSS) of the DESIREE project and OncoDoc are two clinical decision support systems applied to the management of breast cancer. In order to evaluate the DESIREE GL-DSS, we decided to reuse a sample of clinical cases previously resolved by the multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) of the Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) when using OncoDoc. Since we had two different knowledge representation models to represent clinical parameters and decisions, and two formalisms to represent guidelines, we developed a transformation sequence, involving the creation of synthetic patients, the enrichment of DESIREE ontology, and the translation of clinical cases and their decisions, to transform OncoDoc data into the DESIREE representation. Considering MTB decisions as the gold standard, the 84% compliance rate of DESIREE recommendations was rather satisfactory. Some situations (0.7%) concerned clinical cases that were compliant neither with OncoDoc nor with DESIREE that we defined as complex cases, not handled by guidelines, which necessitate effective MTB discussions.

Interoperability issues are common in biomedical informatics. Reusing data generated from a system in another system, or integrating an existing clinical decision support system (CDSS) in a new organization is a complex task due to recurrent problems of concept mapping and alignment. The GL-DSS of the DESIREE project is a guideline-based CDSS to support the management of breast cancer patients. The knowledge base is formalized as an ontology and decision rules. OncoDoc is another CDSS applied to breast cancer management. The knowledge base is structured as a decision tree. OncoDoc has been routinely used by the multidisciplinary tumor board physicians of the Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) for three years leading to the resolution of 1,861 exploitable decisions. Because we were lacking patient data to assess the DESIREE GL-DSS, we investigated the option of reusing OncoDoc patient data. Taking into account that we have two CDSSs with two formalisms to represent clinical practice guidelines and two knowledge representation models, we had to face semantic and structural interoperability issues. This paper reports how we created 10,681 synthetic patients to solve these issues and make OncoDoc data re-usable by the GL-DSS of DESIREE.