Search

Differential diagnosis of suspicious lung masses is essential for the selection of the appropriate therapy strategy. While non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in early stages and single lung metastases from other cancers mostly are resected by surgery, late stage NSCLC, small cell lung cancers (SCLC) and multiple lung metastases are treated by systemic chemo- and/or radiotherapeutic approaches. In many patients, biopsies for the histopathological subtyping can not be taken due to multimorbidity and instable clinical conditions of the patient or unfavourable localisation of the tumor. In addition, heterogeneity of lung tumors may imply the presence of different malignant cell types in one suspicious lesion. As tumor-related biomarkers in blood reflect the biochemical properties of cancer cells, their release or non-release may be helpful to support the clinical decision making. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the potential and the role of serum-based biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of lung cancer which is also mirrored in the new recommendations of the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prognostic information on the course of cancer disease is highly relevant for the accurate decision of the most effective treatment strategy for an individual patient. In early stage disease, the application of adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy after surgery depends on the risk of the patient to early suffer from tumor recurrence. In advanced stage disease, risk stratification of the patients influences the choice of more aggressive or mild therapy alternatives. Besides tumor related parameters like tumor stage and individual factors, additional information by biomarkers is needed to better characterize patients prognosis in both situations. Although there are plenty of studies dealing on the prognostic relevance of diverse biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the results are quite heterogeneous and sometimes conflicting. Reasons for this situation may be found in the design, the performance, the evaluation and the quality of result reporting of the studies. In this review, we focus on the prerequisites of informative prognostic trials, spot on the general shortcomings of studies published so far, and summarize the results of the prognostic studies available for early and advanced stages of NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article looks at developments in the study of lung cancer biomarkers. According to the authors, circulating biochemical markers are important and informative tools for managing lung cancer. Biomarkers are considered vital for follow-up investigations because biochemical changes in the blood manifest early the possibility of increasing tumor activity. Information on the release of biochemical markers by various benign and malignant diseases has been limited.

As the release and amount of circulating biomarkers show considerable variations between individuals, single value determinations are often difficult to be interpreted on their diagnostic or prognostic significance on the individual level. However, changes of the biomarker levels in a specific person during the disease course are quite informative for the estimation of the efficacy of therapy or the early detection of recurrent disease because they consider only intraindividual variations. If methods for marker determination are maintained, preanalytical and analytical standard prerequistits are respected, thresholds for each marker have to be defined which exceeds the normal, intraindividual biological variation. Then continuous biomarker increases may be indicative for disease activity in terms of inefficient therapy response or tumor recurrence while decreasing values often are associated with activity reduction of cancer disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on biomarker kinetics in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and discuss the conditions and pitfalls of their relevance for the estimation efficacy of therapy and the early detection of recurrent disease. Further, we suggest a scenario to reveal the power of the defined biomarker use in future and to include those markers into the individual management of NSCLC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]