1. Comparison of in-situ versus ex-situ delivery of polyethylenimine-BMP-2 polyplexes for rat calvarial defect repair via intraoperative bioprinting
- Author
-
Kazim K Moncal, Miji Yeo, Nazmiye Celik, Timothy M Acri, Elias Rizk, Hwabok Wee, Gregory S Lewis, Aliasger K Salem, and Ibrahim T Ozbolat
- Subjects
Biomaterials ,Biomedical Engineering ,Bioengineering ,General Medicine ,Biochemistry ,Biotechnology - Abstract
Gene therapeutic applications combined with bio- and nano-materials have been used to address current shortcomings in bone tissue engineering due to their feasibility, safety and potential capability for clinical translation. Delivery of non-viral vectors can be altered using gene-activated matrices to improve their efficacy to repair bone defects. Ex-situ and in-situ delivery strategies are the most used methods for bone therapy, which have never been directly compared for their potency to repair critical-sized bone defects. In this regard, we first time explore the delivery of polyethylenimine (PEI) complexed plasmid DNA encoding bone morphogenetic protein-2 (PEI-pBMP-2) using the two delivery strategies, ex-situ and in-situ delivery. To realize these gene delivery strategies, we employed intraoperative bioprinting (IOB), enabling us to 3D bioprint bone tissue constructs directly into defect sites in a surgical setting. Here, we demonstrated IOB of an osteogenic bioink loaded with PEI-pBMP-2 for the in-situ delivery approach, and PEI-pBMP-2 transfected rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells laden bioink for the ex-situ delivery approach as alternative delivery strategies. We found that in-situ delivery of PEI-pBMP-2 significantly improved bone tissue formation compared to ex-situ delivery. Despite debates amongst individual advantages and disadvantages of ex-situ and in-situ delivery strategies, our results ruled in favor of the in-situ delivery strategy, which could be desirable to use for future clinical applications.
- Published
- 2022