Search

Patient movement affects image quality in oral and maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography imaging. While many efforts are made to minimize the possibility of motion during a scan, relatively little attention has been given to motion correction after acquisition. We propose a novel method which can improve the image quality after an oral and maxillofacial scan. The proposed method is based on our previous work and is a retrospective motion estimation and motion compensation (ME/MC) approach that iteratively estimates and compensates for rigid pose change over time. During motion estimation, image update and motion update are performed alternately in a multi-resolution scheme to obtain the motion. We propose use of a feature-based motion update and patch-based image update in the iterative estimation process, to alleviate the effect of limited scan field of view on estimation. During motion compensation, a fine-resolution image reconstruction was performed with compensation for the estimated motion. The proposed ME/MC method was evaluated with simulations, phantom and patient studies. Two experts in dentomaxillofacial radiology assessed the diagnostic importance of the resulting motion artifact suppression. The quality of the reconstructed images was improved after motion compensation, and most of the image artifacts were eliminated. Quantitative analysis by comparison to a reference image and by calculation of a sharpness metric agreed with the qualitative observation. The results are promising, and further evaluation is required to assess the clinical value of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metal artifacts present a challenge to cone-beam CT (CBCT) image-guided surgery, obscuring visualization of metal instruments and adjacent anatomy—often in the very region of interest pertinent to the imaging/surgical tasks. We present a method to reduce the influence of metal artifacts by prospectively defining an image acquisition protocol—viz., the C-arm source-detector orbit—that mitigates metal-induced biases in the projection data. The metal artifact avoidance (MAA) method is compatible with simple mobile C-arms, does not require exact prior information on the patient or metal implants, and is consistent with 3D filtered backprojection (FBP), more advanced (e.g. polyenergetic) model-based image reconstruction (MBIR), and metal artifact reduction (MAR) post-processing methods. The MAA method consists of: (i) coarse localization of metal objects in the field-of-view (FOV) via two or more low-dose scout projection views and segmentation (e.g. a simple U-Net) in coarse backprojection; (ii) model-based prediction of metal-induced x-ray spectral shift for all source-detector vertices accessible by the imaging system (e.g. gantry rotation and tilt angles); and (iii) identification of a circular or non-circular orbit that reduces the variation in spectral shift. The method was developed, tested, and evaluated in a series of studies presenting increasing levels of complexity and realism, including digital simulations, phantom experiment, and cadaver experiment in the context of image-guided spine surgery (pedicle screw implants). The MAA method accurately predicted tilted circular and non-circular orbits that reduced the magnitude of metal artifacts in CBCT reconstructions. Realistic distributions of metal instrumentation were successfully localized (0.71 median Dice coefficient) from 2–6 low-dose scout views even in complex anatomical scenes. The MAA-predicted tilted circular orbits reduced root-mean-square error (RMSE) in 3D image reconstructions by 46%–70% and 'blooming' artifacts (apparent width of the screw shaft) by 20–45%. Non-circular orbits defined by MAA achieved a further ∼46% reduction in RMSE compared to the best (tilted) circular orbit. The MAA method presents a practical means to predict C-arm orbits that minimize spectral bias from metal instrumentation. Resulting orbits—either simple tilted circular orbits or more complex non-circular orbits that can be executed with a motorized multi-axis C-arm—exhibited substantial reduction of metal artifacts in raw CBCT reconstructions by virtue of higher fidelity projection data, which are in turn compatible with subsequent MAR post-processing and/or polyenergetic MBIR to further reduce artifacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) is increasingly used for surgical navigation and validation of device placement. In spinal deformity correction, CBCT provides visualization of pedicle screws and fixation rods in relation to adjacent anatomy. This work reports and evaluates a method that uses prior information regarding such surgical instrumentation for improved metal artifact reduction (MAR). The known-component MAR (KC-MAR) approach achieves precise localization of instrumentation in projection images using rigid or deformable 3D–2D registration of component models, thereby overcoming residual errors associated with segmentation-based methods. Projection data containing metal components are processed via 2D inpainting of the detector signal, followed by 3D filtered back-projection (FBP). Phantom studies were performed to identify nominal algorithm parameters and quantitatively investigate performance over a range of component material composition and size. A cadaver study emulating screw and rod placement in spinal deformity correction was conducted to evaluate performance under realistic clinical imaging conditions. KC-MAR demonstrated reduction in artifacts (standard deviation in voxel values) across a range of component types and dose levels, reducing the artifact to 5–10 HU. Accurate component delineation was demonstrated for rigid (screw) and deformable (rod) models with sub-mm registration errors, and a single-pixel dilation of the projected components was found to compensate for partial-volume effects. Artifacts associated with spine screws and rods were reduced by 40%–80% in cadaver studies, and the resulting images demonstrated markedly improved visualization of instrumentation (e.g. screw threads) within cortical margins. The KC-MAR algorithm combines knowledge of surgical instrumentation with 3D image reconstruction in a manner that overcomes potential pitfalls of segmentation. The approach is compatible with FBP—thereby maintaining simplicity in a manner that is consistent with surgical workflow—or more sophisticated model-based reconstruction methods that could further improve image quality and/or help reduce radiation dose. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]